Exergoeconomic analysis and performance assessment of hydrogen and power production using different gasification systems

被引:20
|
作者
Kalinci, Yildiz [2 ]
Hepbasli, Arif [1 ]
Dincer, Ibrahim [3 ]
机构
[1] Yasar Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Energy Syst Engn, TR-35100 Izmir, Turkey
[2] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Izmir Vocat High Sch, Dept Tech Programs, Izmir, Turkey
[3] Univ Ontario Inst Technol, Fac Engn & Appl Sci, Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Hydrogen production; Downdraft gasification; Circulating fluidized bed gasification; Plasma gasification; Energy; PLASMA GASIFICATION; BIOMASS GASIFICATION; ECONOMIC-EFFICIENCY; EXERGY; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.fuel.2012.06.040
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
In this paper, we investigate three different gasifiers for hydrogen production, namely, downdraft gasifier (DG), circulating fluidized bed gasifier (CFBG) and plasma gasifier (PG) as taken from the literature under Cases 1-3, respectively. These cases are then modified for cogeneration of hydrogen and power. We use the specific exergy cost (SPECO) method to calculate exergy-related parameters and display cost flows for all streams and components. The case studies are selected from different countries. We study how flow rates of streams cost and hydrogen unit costs change if these facilities operate in Turkey. The process life time is considered 15 years, and the inflation rate and energy inflation rate are taken from the Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey as 8.91% and 19.25% while unit energy, water and biomass costs are taken 31.38 $/GJ, 4.59 $/t and 35.42 $/t for Turkey, respectively. The electric power requirements are calculated to be 0.0915, 12.53 and 23.26 MWe for DG, CFBG and PG, respectively. In Cases 1-3, the electric power generated by the systems are 0.144 MW, 1.17 MW and 3.88 MW, respectively and may be sold to the national grid with cost rates of 31.8 $/h, 258.39 $/h and 856.88 $/h. In the systems, the hydrogen production rates and costs per unit mass are obtained to be 0.004 kg/s, 0.521 kg/s and 0.155 kg/s and 1.16 $/kg, 3.33 $/kg and 2.45 $/kg for the DG, the CFBG and the PG, respectively. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 198
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Exergoeconomic assessment and multiobjective optimization of a geothermal-based trigeneration system for electricity, cooling, and clean hydrogen production
    Musharavati, Farayi
    Ahmadi, Pouria
    Khanmohammadi, Shoaib
    JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY, 2021, 145 (03) : 1673 - 1689
  • [32] Thermodynamic analysis of hydrogen production from biomass gasification
    Cohce, M. K.
    Dincer, I.
    Rosen, M. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2010, 35 (10) : 4970 - 4980
  • [33] Performance evaluation at different process parameters of an innovative prototype of biomass gasification system aimed to hydrogen production
    Pallozzi, V.
    Di Carlo, A.
    Bocci, E.
    Villarini, M.
    Foscolo, P. U.
    Carlini, M.
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 130 : 34 - 43
  • [34] Thermodynamic and environmental analysis of integrated supercritical water gasification of sewage sludge for power and hydrogen production
    Hu, Dianqi
    Ren, Changyifan
    Zhang, Shuyuan
    Ma, Miaomiao
    Chen, Yunan
    Chen, Bin
    Guo, Liejin
    ENERGY, 2024, 299
  • [35] Performance assessment of solar-based integrated Cu-Cl systems for hydrogen production
    Ratlamwala, T. A. H.
    Dincer, I.
    SOLAR ENERGY, 2013, 95 : 345 - 356
  • [36] Thermodynamic performance assessment of solar-based hydrogen production systems in Turkey: A detailed review
    Sahmerdan, Orhan
    Cimsit, Canan
    Arici, Muslum
    Colpan, C. Ozgur
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2025, 208
  • [37] Exergy analysis of hydrogen production from biomass gasification
    Abuadala, A.
    Dincer, I.
    Naterer, G. F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2010, 35 (10) : 4981 - 4990
  • [38] Comprehensive Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment of Polygeneration Systems Based on Plasma Gasification and Combined Cycle Power Generation
    Xu, Wenwu
    Yang, Lili
    Fan, Xiaorui
    Cui, Peizhe
    Zhu, Zhaoyou
    Wang, Yinglong
    Zhang, Hongru
    ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2025, 13 (01): : 669 - 680
  • [39] Hydrogen production from biomass gasification in the oil refining industry - A system analysis
    Johansson, Daniella
    Franck, Per-Ake
    Berntsson, Thore
    ENERGY, 2012, 38 (01) : 212 - 227
  • [40] Life Cycle Performance of Hydrogen Production via Agro-Industrial Residue Gasification-A Small Scale Power Plant Study
    Hamedani, Sara Rajabi
    Villarini, Mauro
    Colantoni, Andrea
    Moretti, Michele
    Bocci, Enrico
    ENERGIES, 2018, 11 (03):