How to measure technological distance in collaborations - The case of electric mobility

被引:34
作者
vom Stein, Nicole [1 ]
Sick, Nathalie [1 ]
Leker, Jens [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munster, Inst Business Adm, Dept Chem & Pharm, D-48149 Munster, Germany
关键词
Absorptive capacity; Cross-industry collaboration; Electric mobility; Technological distance; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCES; INNOVATION; KNOWLEDGE; PROXIMITY; INDUSTRY; PERFORMANCE; MERGERS; ACQUISITIONS; ORGANIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2014.05.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Innovation collaborations experienced a substantial growth during recent decades, so that research interest in factors contributing to successful collaboration increased. One proposed success factor is technological distance, which determines the probability of receiving new knowledge from a partner as well as the ability of absorbing it. The methodology for measuring this distance is receiving broad attention in current literature. Therefore, we compare well-established measuring methods based on Euclidian distances with the recently introduced method of the min-complement distance. Collaborations along the entire value chain are seen as a way to overcome technological deficiencies associated with battery development for electric mobility, which implies collaboration of partners with different technological distances. Hence, we specifically focus on cross-industry collaborations comprising partners from the chemical and automobile industries. Our results show that the methodology used highlights different aspects of the approximation of technological distance in the examined collaborations. The use of the min-complement distance seems to be reasonable due to the intuitive property of the independence of irrelevant patent classes in cross-industry collaboration settings. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:154 / 167
页数:14
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]   FUNDAMENTAL STOCKS OF KNOWLEDGE AND PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH [J].
ADAMS, JD .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1990, 98 (04) :673-702
[2]  
Aggarwal CC, 2001, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V1973, P420
[3]   Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study [J].
Ahuja, G .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2000, 45 (03) :425-455
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2000, FDN STAT NATURAL LAN
[5]   Comparing alternative approaches to measuring the geographical accessibility of urban health services: Distance types and aggregation-error issues [J].
Apparicio, Philippe ;
Abdelmajid, Mohamed ;
Riva, Mylene ;
Shearmur, Richard .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH GEOGRAPHICS, 2008, 7 (1)
[6]  
Archibugi D., 1994, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, V4, P17, DOI [DOI 10.1007/BF01200835, 10.1007/bf01200835]
[7]   What percentage of innovations are patented? empirical estimates for European firms [J].
Arundel, A ;
Kabla, I .
RESEARCH POLICY, 1998, 27 (02) :127-141
[8]   A measure of technological distance [J].
Bar, Talia ;
Leiponen, Aija .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2012, 116 (03) :457-459
[9]   Close to you? Bias and precision in patent-based measures of technological proximity [J].
Benner, Mary ;
Waldfogel, Joel .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2008, 37 (09) :1556-1567
[10]   Searching in high-dimensional spaces -: Index structures for improving the performance of multimedia Databases [J].
Böhm, C ;
Berchtold, S ;
Keim, D .
ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS, 2001, 33 (03) :322-373