Comparison of the effects of three different xenogeneic bone grafts used in sinus augmentation simultaneous with dental implant placement on the survival of the implants and the dimensional changes of the region

被引:1
作者
Kucukkurt, Sercan [1 ]
Moharamnejad, Nima [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Aydin Univ, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, TR-34295 Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Dental implants; Survival rate; Maxillary sinus; Heterografts; Particle size; DEPROTEINIZED BOVINE BONE; FLOOR AUGMENTATION; PARTICLE-SIZE; XENOGRAFT; HEIGHT;
D O I
10.23736/S2724-6329.21.04521-6
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Xenografts can be produced in various particle sizes by using different bone types. Currently, there is no consensus about the ideal type of xenograft for sinus augmentations, and this choice depends on the personal ex-perience of clinicians. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the effects of three different xenografts used in sinus augmentation simultaneously with implant placement on the survival of the implants and the dimensional changes of the region. METHODS: One hundred nine sinus augmentations and 164 implants were evaluated in 76 patients. Three different xe-nografts were used: 41 Gen-Os (R) (250-1000 mu m, Corticocancellous; Tecnoss, Giaveno, Turin, Italy), 35 Bio-Oss (R) (1000-2000 mu m, Cancellous; Geistlich Biomaterials italia S.r.l., Vicenza, Italy) and 33 Apatos-Cortical (R) (600-1000 mu m, Cortical; Tecnoss). The preoperative, postoperative, and follow-up (21 +/- 8.8 month) radiographs were evaluated for the dimensional changes and the implant survivals. The data were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Among the implant failures; 3 (5.6%) in 53 implants in Apatos, 2 (3.6%) in 55 implants in Bio-Oss, 9 (16%) in 56 implants in Gen-Os, and 14 (8.5%) total implant failures were observed. This difference between the groups was statistically significant and was due to the high loss rate in the Gen-Os (P=0.044). There was a mean difference of-1.8 +/- 1.5mm between the measured bone heights on postoperative day (14.2 +/- 2.4mm) and the last follow-up (12.4 +/- 2.5 mm). While the loss of height was not affected due to the graft type (P=0.981), the general 12.6% vertical loss was statis-tically significant (P<0.0001), also the length of implants placed reduced this loss (P=0.036). CONCLUSIONS: Within the limits of this retrospective study, it can be concluded that: 1) The sinus augmentation pro-cedures with thicker particle size grafts achieved higher success rate; and 2) over the time, 12.6% loss may occur in the height of grafted area.
引用
收藏
页码:248 / 256
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
[21]   Comparison of Two Kinds of Bovine Bone in Maxillary Sinus Augmentation: A Histomorphometric Study [J].
Moon, Jee-Won ;
Sohn, Dong-Seok ;
Heo, Jeung-Uk ;
Kim, Jin Sun .
IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2015, 24 (01) :19-24
[22]  
Moussa Nabil Takahiro, 2020, Dent Clin North Am, V64, P473, DOI 10.1016/j.cden.2019.12.011
[23]  
Nevins M, 2011, INT J PERIODONT REST, V31, P227
[24]   Comparison of two different xenografts in bilateral sinus augmentation: Radiographic and histologic findings [J].
Panagiotou, Dimitrios ;
Karaca, Ebru Ozkan ;
Ipci, Sebnem Dirikan ;
Cakar, Gokser ;
Olgac, Vakur ;
Yilmaz, Selcuk .
QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 46 (07) :611-619
[25]   Effective doses from panoramic radiography and CBCT (cone beam CT) using dose area product (DAP) in dentistry [J].
Shin, H. S. ;
Nam, K. C. ;
Park, H. ;
Choi, H. U. ;
Kim, H. Y. ;
Park, C. S. .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2014, 43 (05)
[26]   Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation With Synthetic Bone Substitutes Compared With Other Grafting Materials: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J].
Starch-Jensen, Thomas ;
Mordenfeld, Arne ;
Becktor, Jonas Peter ;
Jensen, Simon Storgard .
IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2018, 27 (03) :363-374
[27]   Evaluation of bone formation following the osteotome sinus floor elevation technique without grafting using cone beam computed tomography: a preliminary study [J].
Suk-Arj, Panapohn ;
Wongchuensoontorn, Chanchai ;
Taebunpakul, Patrayu .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2019, 5 (1)
[28]   Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation Using Xenograft: Gene Expression and Histologic Analysis [J].
Suwanwela, Jaijam ;
Puangchaipruk, Dollaya ;
Wattanasirmkit, Kamolporn ;
Kamolratanakul, Paksinee ;
Jansisyanont, Pornchai .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2017, 32 (03) :611-616
[29]   Effect of Xenograft (ABBM) Particle Size on Vital Bone Formation Following Maxillary Sinus Augmentation: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Histomorphometric Trial [J].
Testori, Tiziano ;
Wallace, Stephen S. ;
Trisi, Paolo ;
Capelli, Matteo ;
Zuffetti, Francesco ;
Del Fabbro, Massimo .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2013, 33 (04) :467-476
[30]   Relative performance of various biomaterials used for maxillary sinus augmentation: A Bayesian network meta-analysis [J].
Trimmel, Balint ;
Gede, Noemi ;
Hegyi, Peter ;
Szakacs, Zsolt ;
Mezey, Gyongyi Anna ;
Varga, Eszter ;
Kivovics, Marton ;
Hanak, Lilla ;
Rumbus, Zoltan ;
Szabo, Gyorgy .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2021, 32 (02) :135-153