Comparison of the effects of three different xenogeneic bone grafts used in sinus augmentation simultaneous with dental implant placement on the survival of the implants and the dimensional changes of the region

被引:1
作者
Kucukkurt, Sercan [1 ]
Moharamnejad, Nima [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Aydin Univ, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, TR-34295 Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Dental implants; Survival rate; Maxillary sinus; Heterografts; Particle size; DEPROTEINIZED BOVINE BONE; FLOOR AUGMENTATION; PARTICLE-SIZE; XENOGRAFT; HEIGHT;
D O I
10.23736/S2724-6329.21.04521-6
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Xenografts can be produced in various particle sizes by using different bone types. Currently, there is no consensus about the ideal type of xenograft for sinus augmentations, and this choice depends on the personal ex-perience of clinicians. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the effects of three different xenografts used in sinus augmentation simultaneously with implant placement on the survival of the implants and the dimensional changes of the region. METHODS: One hundred nine sinus augmentations and 164 implants were evaluated in 76 patients. Three different xe-nografts were used: 41 Gen-Os (R) (250-1000 mu m, Corticocancellous; Tecnoss, Giaveno, Turin, Italy), 35 Bio-Oss (R) (1000-2000 mu m, Cancellous; Geistlich Biomaterials italia S.r.l., Vicenza, Italy) and 33 Apatos-Cortical (R) (600-1000 mu m, Cortical; Tecnoss). The preoperative, postoperative, and follow-up (21 +/- 8.8 month) radiographs were evaluated for the dimensional changes and the implant survivals. The data were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Among the implant failures; 3 (5.6%) in 53 implants in Apatos, 2 (3.6%) in 55 implants in Bio-Oss, 9 (16%) in 56 implants in Gen-Os, and 14 (8.5%) total implant failures were observed. This difference between the groups was statistically significant and was due to the high loss rate in the Gen-Os (P=0.044). There was a mean difference of-1.8 +/- 1.5mm between the measured bone heights on postoperative day (14.2 +/- 2.4mm) and the last follow-up (12.4 +/- 2.5 mm). While the loss of height was not affected due to the graft type (P=0.981), the general 12.6% vertical loss was statis-tically significant (P<0.0001), also the length of implants placed reduced this loss (P=0.036). CONCLUSIONS: Within the limits of this retrospective study, it can be concluded that: 1) The sinus augmentation pro-cedures with thicker particle size grafts achieved higher success rate; and 2) over the time, 12.6% loss may occur in the height of grafted area.
引用
收藏
页码:248 / 256
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Clinical Performance of Dental Implants Following Sinus Floor Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials with at Least 3 Years of Follow-up
    Antonoglou, Georgios N.
    Stavropoulos, Andreas
    Samara, Maria D.
    Ioannidis, Alexis
    Benic, Goran I.
    Papageorgiou, Spyridon N.
    Sandor, George K.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2018, 33 (03) : E45 - E65
  • [2] Evaluation of Three-Dimensional Volumetric Changes After Sinus Floor Augmentation with Mineralized Cortical Bone Allograft
    Berberi A.
    Bouserhal L.
    Nader N.
    Assaf R.B.
    Nassif N.B.
    Bouserhal J.
    Salameh Z.
    [J]. Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, 2015, 14 (3) : 624 - 629
  • [3] The Processing of Xenografts Will Result in Different Clinical Responses
    Block, Michael S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 77 (04) : 690 - 697
  • [4] Chitosan Use in Dentistry: A Systematic Review of Recent Clinical Studies
    Cicciu, Marco
    Fiorillo, Luca
    Cervino, Gabriele
    [J]. MARINE DRUGS, 2019, 17 (07)
  • [5] Daga Dipti, 2018, J Oral Biol Craniofac Res, V8, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.jobcr.2017.11.002
  • [6] Bone Formation Following Sinus Augmentation with an Equine-Derived Bone Graft: A Retrospective Histologic and Histomorphometric Study with 36-Month Follow-up
    Di Stefano, Danilo Alessio
    Gastaldi, Giorgio
    Vinci, Raffaele
    Polizzi, Elisabetta Maria
    Cinci, Lorenzo
    Pieri, Laura
    Gherlone, Enrico
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2016, 31 (02) : 406 - 412
  • [7] Fama F, 2017, CHIN J TRAUMATOL, V20, P4, DOI 10.1016/j.cjtee.2016.11.003
  • [8] ALARA still applies
    Farman, AG
    [J]. ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 2005, 100 (04): : 395 - 397
  • [9] Histological and radiological evaluation of sintered and non-sintered deproteinized bovine bone substitute materials in sinus augmentation procedures. A prospective, randomized-controlled, clinical multicenter study
    Fienitz, Tim
    Moses, Ofer
    Klemm, Christoph
    Happe, Arndt
    Ferrari, Daniel
    Kreppel, Matthias
    Ormianer, Zeev
    Gal, Moti
    Rothamel, Daniel
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2017, 21 (03) : 787 - 794
  • [10] Growth Factors in Oral Tissue Engineering: New Perspectives and Current Therapeutic Options
    Fiorillo, Luca
    Cervino, Gabriele
    Galindo-Moreno, Pablo
    Herford, Alan Scott
    Spagnuolo, Gianrico
    Cicciu, Marco
    [J]. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 2021