Telomere-based risk models for the early diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer

被引:3
|
作者
Rubio Galisteo, Juan Manuel [1 ]
Fernandez, Luis [2 ]
Gomez Gomez, Enrique [1 ]
de Pedro, Nuria [2 ]
Cano Castineira, Roque [3 ]
Pedregosa, Ana Blanca [1 ]
Guler, Ipek [4 ]
Carrasco Valiente, Julia [1 ]
Esteban, Laura [2 ]
Gonzalez, Sheila [5 ]
Castello, Nila [2 ]
Otero, Lissette [2 ]
Garcia, Jorge [2 ]
Segovia, Enrique [2 ]
Requena Tapia, Maria Jose [1 ]
Najarro, Pilar [2 ]
机构
[1] UCO, IMIBIC, Reina Sofia Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Cordoba, Spain
[2] Life Length SL, Madrid, Spain
[3] Infanta Margarita Hosp, Dept Urol, Cordoba, Spain
[4] Inst Maimonides Invest Biomed Cordoba IMIBIC, Cordoba, Spain
[5] Sermes CRO, Madrid, Spain
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
ISUP CONSENSUS CONFERENCE; INTERNATIONAL-SOCIETY; LENGTH; PREDICTION; BIOMARKERS; BIOPSY;
D O I
10.1038/s41391-020-0232-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background The objective of this study was to explore telomere-associated variables (TAV) as complementary biomarkers in the early diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa), analyzing their application in risk models for significant PCa (Gleason score > 6). Methods As part of a larger prospective longitudinal study of patients with suspicion of PCa undergoing prostate biopsy according to clinical practice, a subgroup of patients (n = 401) with PSA 3-10 ng/ml and no prior biopsies was used to evaluate the contribution of TAV to discern non-significant PCa from significant PCa. The cohort was randomly split for training (2/3) and validation (1/3) of the models. High-throughput quantitative fluorescence in-situ hybridization was used to evaluate TAV in peripheral blood mononucleated cells. Models were generated following principal component analysis and random forest and their utility as risk predictors was evaluated by analyzing their predictive capacity and accuracy, summarized by ROC curves, and their clinical benefit with decision curves analysis. Results The median age of the patients was 63 years, with a median PSA of 5 ng/ml and a percentage of PCa diagnosis of 40.6% and significant PCa of 19.2%. Two TAV-based risk models were selected (TAV models 1 and 2) with an AUC >= 0.83 in the full study cohort, and AUC > 0.76 in the internal validation cohort. Both models showed an improvement in decision capacity when compared to the application of the PCPT-RC in the low-risk probabilities range. In the validation cohort, with TAV models 1 and 2, 33% /48% of biopsies would have been avoided losing 0/10.3% of significant PCa, respectively. The models were also tested and validated on an independent, retrospective, non contemporary cohort. Conclusions Telomere analysis through TAV should be considered as a new risk-score biomarker with potential to increase the prediction capacity of significant PCa in patients with PSA between 3-10 ng/ml.
引用
收藏
页码:88 / 95
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Prostate cancer volume at biopsy predicts clinically significant upgrading
    Dong, Fei
    Jones, J. Stephen
    Stephenson, Andrew J.
    Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina
    Reuther, Alwyn M.
    Klein, Eric A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (03) : 896 - 900
  • [42] Prediction of Clinically Significant Cancer Using Radiomics Features of Pre-Biopsy of Multiparametric MRI in Men Suspected of Prostate Cancer
    Ogbonnaya, Chidozie N.
    Zhang, Xinyu
    Alsaedi, Basim S. O.
    Pratt, Norman
    Zhang, Yilong
    Johnston, Lisa
    Nabi, Ghulam
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (24)
  • [43] A two-stage model for precise identification and Gleason grading of clinically significant prostate cancer: a hybrid approach
    Zou, Yuyan
    Wang, Xuechun
    Ma, Fen
    Liu, Xulun
    Jiao, Chunyue
    Kang, Zhen
    Cui, Jingjing
    Zhang, Yang
    Xie, Yan
    Chen, Lei
    Tian, Ronghua
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RADIATION SCIENCES, 2025, 72 (01) : 93 - 105
  • [44] Defining clinically significant prostate cancer on the basis of pathological findings
    Matoso, Andres
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2019, 74 (01) : 135 - 145
  • [45] TRF1 and TRF2: pioneering targets in telomere-based cancer therapy
    Kallingal, Anoop
    Krzemieniecki, Radoslaw
    Maciejewska, Natalia
    Brankiewicz-Kopcinska, Wioletta
    Baginski, Maciej
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 150 (07)
  • [46] Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Diagnosis Without Histological Proof in the Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Era: The Jury Is Still Out
    Wenzel, Mike
    Hoeh, Benedikt
    Mandel, Philipp
    Chun, Felix Kh
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2022, 45 : 50 - 51
  • [47] External Validation and Comparison of Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators Incorporating Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prediction of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Mehralivand, Sherif
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 (04) : 725 - 726
  • [48] Usefulness of urinary biomarker-based risk score and multiparametric MRI for clinically significant prostate cancer detection in biopsy-naïve patients
    Kemesiene, Jurate
    Nicolau, Carlos
    Cholstauskas, Gytis
    Zviniene, Kristina
    Lopeta, Mantvydas
    Veneviciute, Simona
    Asmenaviciute, Ieva
    Tamosauskaite, Kamile
    Pikuniene, Ingrida
    Jievaltas, Mindaugas
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2025,
  • [49] Detection of Clinically Significant Index Prostate Cancer Using Microultrasound: Correlation With Radical Prostatectomy
    Callejas, Matias F.
    Klein, Eric A.
    Truong, Matthew
    Thomas, Lewis
    McKenney, Jesse K.
    Ghai, Sangeet
    UROLOGY, 2022, 169 : 150 - 155
  • [50] A risk model for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer based on bi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging in a Japanese cohort
    Sakaguchi, Kazushige
    Hayashida, Michikata
    Tanaka, Naoto
    Oka, Suguru
    Urakami, Shinji
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)