Telomere-based risk models for the early diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer

被引:3
|
作者
Rubio Galisteo, Juan Manuel [1 ]
Fernandez, Luis [2 ]
Gomez Gomez, Enrique [1 ]
de Pedro, Nuria [2 ]
Cano Castineira, Roque [3 ]
Pedregosa, Ana Blanca [1 ]
Guler, Ipek [4 ]
Carrasco Valiente, Julia [1 ]
Esteban, Laura [2 ]
Gonzalez, Sheila [5 ]
Castello, Nila [2 ]
Otero, Lissette [2 ]
Garcia, Jorge [2 ]
Segovia, Enrique [2 ]
Requena Tapia, Maria Jose [1 ]
Najarro, Pilar [2 ]
机构
[1] UCO, IMIBIC, Reina Sofia Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Cordoba, Spain
[2] Life Length SL, Madrid, Spain
[3] Infanta Margarita Hosp, Dept Urol, Cordoba, Spain
[4] Inst Maimonides Invest Biomed Cordoba IMIBIC, Cordoba, Spain
[5] Sermes CRO, Madrid, Spain
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
ISUP CONSENSUS CONFERENCE; INTERNATIONAL-SOCIETY; LENGTH; PREDICTION; BIOMARKERS; BIOPSY;
D O I
10.1038/s41391-020-0232-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background The objective of this study was to explore telomere-associated variables (TAV) as complementary biomarkers in the early diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa), analyzing their application in risk models for significant PCa (Gleason score > 6). Methods As part of a larger prospective longitudinal study of patients with suspicion of PCa undergoing prostate biopsy according to clinical practice, a subgroup of patients (n = 401) with PSA 3-10 ng/ml and no prior biopsies was used to evaluate the contribution of TAV to discern non-significant PCa from significant PCa. The cohort was randomly split for training (2/3) and validation (1/3) of the models. High-throughput quantitative fluorescence in-situ hybridization was used to evaluate TAV in peripheral blood mononucleated cells. Models were generated following principal component analysis and random forest and their utility as risk predictors was evaluated by analyzing their predictive capacity and accuracy, summarized by ROC curves, and their clinical benefit with decision curves analysis. Results The median age of the patients was 63 years, with a median PSA of 5 ng/ml and a percentage of PCa diagnosis of 40.6% and significant PCa of 19.2%. Two TAV-based risk models were selected (TAV models 1 and 2) with an AUC >= 0.83 in the full study cohort, and AUC > 0.76 in the internal validation cohort. Both models showed an improvement in decision capacity when compared to the application of the PCPT-RC in the low-risk probabilities range. In the validation cohort, with TAV models 1 and 2, 33% /48% of biopsies would have been avoided losing 0/10.3% of significant PCa, respectively. The models were also tested and validated on an independent, retrospective, non contemporary cohort. Conclusions Telomere analysis through TAV should be considered as a new risk-score biomarker with potential to increase the prediction capacity of significant PCa in patients with PSA between 3-10 ng/ml.
引用
收藏
页码:88 / 95
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A 4K score/MRI-based nomogram for predicting prostate cancer, clinically significant prostate cancer, and unfavorable prostate cancer
    Wagaskar, Vinayak G.
    Sobotka, Stanislaw
    Ratnani, Parita
    Young, James
    Lantz, Anna
    Parekh, Sneha
    Falagario, Ugo Giovanni
    Li, Li
    Lewis, Sara
    Haines, Kenneth, III
    Punnen, Sanoj
    Wiklund, Peter
    Tewari, Ash
    CANCER REPORTS, 2021, 4 (04)
  • [32] The efficacy of different biomarkers and endpoints to refine referrals for suspected prostate cancer: the TARGET study (Tiered integrAted tests for eaRly diaGnosis of clinically significant ProstatE Tumours)
    Lophatananon, Artitaya
    Muir, Kenneth R.
    Gnanapragasam, Vincent J.
    BMC MEDICINE, 2024, 22 (01):
  • [33] Evaluation of blood and urine based biomarkers for detection of clinically-significant prostate cancer
    Robinson, Hunter S.
    Lee, Sangmyung S.
    Barocas, Daniel A.
    Tosoian, Jeffrey J.
    PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2025, 28 (01) : 45 - 55
  • [34] Predicting clinically significant prostate cancer based on preoperative patient profile and serum biomarkers
    Faiena, Izak
    Kim, Sinae
    Farber, Nicholas
    Kwon, Young Suk
    Shinder, Brian
    Patel, Neal
    Salmasi, Amirali H.
    Jang, Thomas
    Singer, Eric A.
    Kim, Wun-Jae
    Kim, Isaac Y.
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (65) : 109783 - 109790
  • [35] Prostate Atypia: Does Repeat Biopsy Detect Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer?
    Dorin, Ryan P.
    Wiener, Scott
    Harris, Cory D.
    Wagner, Joseph R.
    PROSTATE, 2015, 75 (07) : 673 - 678
  • [36] Characterizing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Template Prostate Mapping Biopsy
    Ahmed, Hashim Uddin
    Hu, Yipeng
    Carter, Tim
    Arumainayagam, Nimalan
    Lecornet, Emilie
    Freeman, Alex
    Hawkes, David
    Barratt, Dean C.
    Emberton, Mark
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 186 (02) : 458 - 464
  • [37] Micro-Ultrasound Imaging for Accuracy of Diagnosis in Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
    Zhang, Minhao
    Wang, Rong
    Wu, Yuqing
    Jing, Jibo
    Chen, Shuqiu
    Zhang, Guangyuan
    Xu, Bin
    Liu, Chunhui
    Chen, Ming
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2019, 9
  • [38] Detection of clinically significant cancer in the anterior prostate by transperineal biopsy
    Cowan, Tim
    Baker, Emily
    McCray, Gabriella
    Reeves, Fairleigh
    Houlihan, Kimberley
    Johns-Putra, Lydia
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 126 : 33 - 37
  • [39] Radiological semantics discriminate clinically significant grade prostate cancer
    Li, Qian
    Lu, Hong
    Choi, Jung
    Gage, Kenneth
    Feuerlein, Sebastian
    Pow-Sang, Julio M.
    Gillies, Robert
    Balagurunathan, Yoganand
    CANCER IMAGING, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [40] Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Subharmonic Imaging
    Gupta, I.
    Freid, B.
    Masarapu, V.
    Machado, P.
    Trabulsi, E.
    Wallace, K.
    Halpern, E.
    Forsberg, F.
    2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL ULTRASONICS SYMPOSIUM (IUS), 2019, : 1181 - 1184