Telomere-based risk models for the early diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer

被引:3
|
作者
Rubio Galisteo, Juan Manuel [1 ]
Fernandez, Luis [2 ]
Gomez Gomez, Enrique [1 ]
de Pedro, Nuria [2 ]
Cano Castineira, Roque [3 ]
Pedregosa, Ana Blanca [1 ]
Guler, Ipek [4 ]
Carrasco Valiente, Julia [1 ]
Esteban, Laura [2 ]
Gonzalez, Sheila [5 ]
Castello, Nila [2 ]
Otero, Lissette [2 ]
Garcia, Jorge [2 ]
Segovia, Enrique [2 ]
Requena Tapia, Maria Jose [1 ]
Najarro, Pilar [2 ]
机构
[1] UCO, IMIBIC, Reina Sofia Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Cordoba, Spain
[2] Life Length SL, Madrid, Spain
[3] Infanta Margarita Hosp, Dept Urol, Cordoba, Spain
[4] Inst Maimonides Invest Biomed Cordoba IMIBIC, Cordoba, Spain
[5] Sermes CRO, Madrid, Spain
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
ISUP CONSENSUS CONFERENCE; INTERNATIONAL-SOCIETY; LENGTH; PREDICTION; BIOMARKERS; BIOPSY;
D O I
10.1038/s41391-020-0232-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background The objective of this study was to explore telomere-associated variables (TAV) as complementary biomarkers in the early diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa), analyzing their application in risk models for significant PCa (Gleason score > 6). Methods As part of a larger prospective longitudinal study of patients with suspicion of PCa undergoing prostate biopsy according to clinical practice, a subgroup of patients (n = 401) with PSA 3-10 ng/ml and no prior biopsies was used to evaluate the contribution of TAV to discern non-significant PCa from significant PCa. The cohort was randomly split for training (2/3) and validation (1/3) of the models. High-throughput quantitative fluorescence in-situ hybridization was used to evaluate TAV in peripheral blood mononucleated cells. Models were generated following principal component analysis and random forest and their utility as risk predictors was evaluated by analyzing their predictive capacity and accuracy, summarized by ROC curves, and their clinical benefit with decision curves analysis. Results The median age of the patients was 63 years, with a median PSA of 5 ng/ml and a percentage of PCa diagnosis of 40.6% and significant PCa of 19.2%. Two TAV-based risk models were selected (TAV models 1 and 2) with an AUC >= 0.83 in the full study cohort, and AUC > 0.76 in the internal validation cohort. Both models showed an improvement in decision capacity when compared to the application of the PCPT-RC in the low-risk probabilities range. In the validation cohort, with TAV models 1 and 2, 33% /48% of biopsies would have been avoided losing 0/10.3% of significant PCa, respectively. The models were also tested and validated on an independent, retrospective, non contemporary cohort. Conclusions Telomere analysis through TAV should be considered as a new risk-score biomarker with potential to increase the prediction capacity of significant PCa in patients with PSA between 3-10 ng/ml.
引用
收藏
页码:88 / 95
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prostate Specific Antigen Density and Clinically-Significant Prostate Cancer: The Influence of Prostatic Volume
    Robinson, Elizabeth
    Kinsella, Netty
    ap Dafydd, Derfel
    Shur, Joshua
    Sohaib, Aslam
    Hazell, Steve
    Bassett, Paul
    Kumar, Pardeep
    Mayer, Erik
    Cahill, Declan
    Withey, Samuel J.
    PROSTATE, 2025, : 784 - 791
  • [22] The combined value of mpUS and mpMRI-TRUS fusion for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Zhang, Xin
    Hong, Hua
    Liang, Danyan
    CANCER IMAGING, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [23] Factors improving the diagnostic performance of targeted biopsies in the diagnosis of significant prostate cancer
    Demichel, Natacha
    Coffinet, Julien
    Taha, Fayek
    Tambwe, Ricky
    Belkessa, Nasreddine
    Zayani, Chokri
    Durlach, Anne
    Larre, Stephane
    Gomis, Philippe
    Leon, Priscilla
    FRENCH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 34 (13):
  • [24] Multiparametric MRI in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Futterer, Jurgen J.
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 18 (04) : 597 - 606
  • [25] Development and evaluation of the MiCheck® Prostate test for clinically significant prostate cancer
    Shore, Neal D.
    Polikarpov, Dmitry M.
    Pieczonka, Christopher M.
    Henderson, R. Jonathan
    Bailen, James L.
    Saltzstein, Daniel R.
    Concepcion, Raoul S.
    Beebe-Dimmer, Jennifer L.
    Ruterbusch, Julie J.
    Levin, Rachel A.
    Wissmueller, Sandra
    Le, Thao Ho
    Gillatt, David A.
    Chan, Daniel W.
    Deng, Niantao
    Siddireddy, Jaya Sowjanya
    Lu, Yanling
    Campbelle, Douglas H.
    Walsh, Bradley J.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2023, 41 (11) : 454.e9 - 454.e16
  • [26] Risk of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Associated With Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 (Equivocal) Lesions Identified on Multiparametric Prostate MRI
    Sheridan, Alison D.
    Nath, Sameer K.
    Syed, Jamil S.
    Aneja, Sanjay
    Sprenkle, Preston C.
    Weinreb, Jeffrey C.
    Spektor, Michael
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 210 (02) : 347 - 357
  • [27] Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Outperforms the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Risk Calculator in Predicting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Salami, Simpa S.
    Vira, Manish A.
    Turkbey, Baris
    Fakhoury, Mathew
    Yaskiv, Oksana
    Villani, Robert
    Ben-Levi, Eran
    Rastinehad, Ardeshir R.
    CANCER, 2014, 120 (18) : 2876 - 2882
  • [28] Beyond blood biomarkers: the role of SelectMDX in clinically significant prostate cancer identification
    Ferro, Matteo
    Rocco, Bernardo
    Maggi, Martina
    Lucarelli, Giuseppe
    Falagario, Ugo Giovanni
    Del Giudice, Francesco
    Crocetto, Felice
    Barone, Biagio
    La Civita, Evelina
    Lasorsa, Francesco
    Brescia, Antonio
    Catellani, Michele
    Busetto, Gian Maria
    Tataru, Octavian Sabin
    Terracciano, Daniela
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 23 (12) : 1061 - 1070
  • [29] A randomized trial of early detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (ProScreen): study design and rationale
    Auvinen, Anssi
    Rannikko, Antti
    Taari, Kimmo
    Kujala, Paula
    Mirtti, Tuomas
    Kenttamies, Anu
    Rinta-Kiikka, Irina
    Lehtimaki, Terho
    Oksala, Niku
    Pettersson, Kim
    Tammela, Teuvo L.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 32 (06) : 521 - 527
  • [30] Artificial intelligence-assisted enhancement of prostate volume metrics in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer: a retrospective analysis
    Zhang, Yan
    He, Shengyun
    Chen, Jie
    Liu, Guiqin
    Luo, Yuansheng
    Song, Yang
    Zhou, Yan
    Zhu, Yinjie
    Wei, Xiaobin
    Wu, Guangyu
    QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2025, 15 (02) : 1641 - 1652