Telomere-based risk models for the early diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer

被引:3
|
作者
Rubio Galisteo, Juan Manuel [1 ]
Fernandez, Luis [2 ]
Gomez Gomez, Enrique [1 ]
de Pedro, Nuria [2 ]
Cano Castineira, Roque [3 ]
Pedregosa, Ana Blanca [1 ]
Guler, Ipek [4 ]
Carrasco Valiente, Julia [1 ]
Esteban, Laura [2 ]
Gonzalez, Sheila [5 ]
Castello, Nila [2 ]
Otero, Lissette [2 ]
Garcia, Jorge [2 ]
Segovia, Enrique [2 ]
Requena Tapia, Maria Jose [1 ]
Najarro, Pilar [2 ]
机构
[1] UCO, IMIBIC, Reina Sofia Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Cordoba, Spain
[2] Life Length SL, Madrid, Spain
[3] Infanta Margarita Hosp, Dept Urol, Cordoba, Spain
[4] Inst Maimonides Invest Biomed Cordoba IMIBIC, Cordoba, Spain
[5] Sermes CRO, Madrid, Spain
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
ISUP CONSENSUS CONFERENCE; INTERNATIONAL-SOCIETY; LENGTH; PREDICTION; BIOMARKERS; BIOPSY;
D O I
10.1038/s41391-020-0232-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background The objective of this study was to explore telomere-associated variables (TAV) as complementary biomarkers in the early diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa), analyzing their application in risk models for significant PCa (Gleason score > 6). Methods As part of a larger prospective longitudinal study of patients with suspicion of PCa undergoing prostate biopsy according to clinical practice, a subgroup of patients (n = 401) with PSA 3-10 ng/ml and no prior biopsies was used to evaluate the contribution of TAV to discern non-significant PCa from significant PCa. The cohort was randomly split for training (2/3) and validation (1/3) of the models. High-throughput quantitative fluorescence in-situ hybridization was used to evaluate TAV in peripheral blood mononucleated cells. Models were generated following principal component analysis and random forest and their utility as risk predictors was evaluated by analyzing their predictive capacity and accuracy, summarized by ROC curves, and their clinical benefit with decision curves analysis. Results The median age of the patients was 63 years, with a median PSA of 5 ng/ml and a percentage of PCa diagnosis of 40.6% and significant PCa of 19.2%. Two TAV-based risk models were selected (TAV models 1 and 2) with an AUC >= 0.83 in the full study cohort, and AUC > 0.76 in the internal validation cohort. Both models showed an improvement in decision capacity when compared to the application of the PCPT-RC in the low-risk probabilities range. In the validation cohort, with TAV models 1 and 2, 33% /48% of biopsies would have been avoided losing 0/10.3% of significant PCa, respectively. The models were also tested and validated on an independent, retrospective, non contemporary cohort. Conclusions Telomere analysis through TAV should be considered as a new risk-score biomarker with potential to increase the prediction capacity of significant PCa in patients with PSA between 3-10 ng/ml.
引用
收藏
页码:88 / 95
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Improving the evaluation and diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Kryvenko, Oleksandr N.
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2017, 27 (03) : 191 - 197
  • [2] Improving the evaluation and diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in 2017
    Carlsson, Sigrid V.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2017, 27 (03) : 198 - 204
  • [3] Construction and Comparison of Different Models in Detecting Prostate Cancer and Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Zhou, Yongheng
    Qi, Wenqiang
    Cui, Jianfeng
    Zhong, Minglei
    Lv, Guangda
    Qu, Sifeng
    Chen, Shouzhen
    Li, Rongyang
    Shi, Benkang
    Zhu, Yaofeng
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [4] Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Predictive Models for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Triquell, Marina
    Campistol, Miriam
    Celma, Ana
    Regis, Lucas
    Cuadras, Merce
    Planas, Jacques
    Trilla, Enrique
    Morote, Juan
    CANCERS, 2022, 14 (19)
  • [5] Identification and evaluation of clinically significant prostate cancer: a step towards personalized diagnosis
    Ali, Adnan
    Hoyle, Alexander
    Baena, Esther
    Clarke, Noel W.
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2017, 27 (03) : 217 - 224
  • [6] Prostate Health Index density improves detection of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Tosoian, Jeffrey J.
    Druskin, Sasha C.
    Andreas, Darian
    Mullane, Patrick
    Chappidi, Meera
    Joo, Sarah
    Ghabili, Kamyar
    Mamawala, Mufaddal
    Agostino, Joseph
    Carter, Herbert B.
    Partin, Alan W.
    Sokoll, Lori J.
    Ross, Ashley E.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 120 (06) : 793 - 798
  • [7] The association of family history of prostate cancer with the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in Korean population
    Park, Jee Soo
    Koo, Kyo Chul
    Chun, Byung Ha
    Lee, Kwang Suk
    INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2019, 60 (06) : 442 - 446
  • [8] The Prostate Health Index Selectively Identifies Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Loeb, Stacy
    Sanda, Martin G.
    Broyles, Dennis L.
    Shin, Sanghyuk S.
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Wei, John T.
    Partin, Alan W.
    Klee, George G.
    Slawin, Kevin M.
    Marks, Leonard S.
    van Schaik, Ron H. N.
    Chan, Daniel W.
    Sokoll, Lori J.
    Cruz, Amabelle B.
    Mizrahi, Isaac A.
    Catalona, William J.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (04) : 1163 - 1169
  • [9] Raman spectroscopy system for real-time diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer tissue
    van Breugel, Suse J.
    Low, Irene
    Christie, Mary L.
    Pokorny, Morgan R.
    Nagarajan, Ramya
    Holtkamp, Hannah U.
    Srinivasa, Komal
    Amirapu, Satya
    Nieuwoudt, Michel K.
    Simpson, M. Cather
    Zargar-Shoshtari, Kamran
    Aguergaray, Claude
    JOURNAL OF BIOPHOTONICS, 2023, 16 (05)
  • [10] Development and validation of a novel multivariate risk score to guide biopsy decision for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Klocker, Helmut
    Golding, Bruno
    Weber, Stephan
    Steiner, Eberhard
    Tennstedt, Pierre
    Keller, Thomas
    Schiess, Ralph
    Gillessen, Silke
    Horninger, Wolfgang
    Steuber, Thomas
    BJUI COMPASS, 2020, 1 (01): : 15 - 20