Retrospective review of 50 canine nasal tumours evaluated by low-field magnetic resonance imaging

被引:23
作者
Avner, A. [1 ,2 ]
Dobson, J. M. [2 ]
Sales, J. I. [2 ]
Herrtage, M. E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Farm Vet Specialists Referral Ctr, IL-44905 Kefar Sava, Israel
[2] Univ Cambridge, Queens Vet Sch Hosp, Cambridge CB3 0ES, England
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1748-5827.2007.00512.x
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES: Low-field magnetic resonance imaging machines are being used more often in veterinary practice for the investigation of sinonasal disease. The aim of this retrospective study was to describe and characterise the low-field magnetic resonance imaging features of nasal tumours in dogs. METHODS: The Queen's Veterinary School Hospital magnetic resonance imaging database (2001-2005) was searched for dogs with a magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis of a nasal tumour. Fifty cases with histological diagnosis of nasal tumour were found. The appearance and extent of the nasal tumour as well as the involvement of adjacent anatomic structures were examined against a checklist. RESULTS: The most common magnetic resonance imaging findings were as follows. (1) Soft tissue mass replacing the destroyed nasal conchae and/or ethmoturbinates (98 per cent of cases). (2) Nasal septum destruction (68 per cent of cases). (3) Retained secretions with or without mass caudally in frontal sinuses (62 per cent of cases). (4) Nasal/frontal bone destruction (52 per cent of cases). Low-field magnetic resonance imaging allowed differentiation of tumour tissue from retained secretions or necrotic tissue. Magnetic resonance imaging was invaluable in assessing the extension of the tumour into the maxillary recesses, caudal recesses, nasopharynx, adjacent bones and cranial cavity. The tumour often extended caudally into the frontal sinuses, nasopharynx and perhaps most importantly into the caudal recesses. Tumour extension into the cranial cavity was not common (16 per cent), and only three of these cases showed neurological signs. However, 54 per cent of cases showed focal meningeal (dural) hyperintensity, although the significance of this is unclear. A significant difference (P < 0.05) in tumour signal intensity between the sarcomas and carcinomas was found. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The use of a low-field magnetic resonance imaging technique is excellent for the diagnosis and determination of extent of sinonasal tumours.
引用
收藏
页码:233 / 239
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC IMAGING OF NASAL DISEASE IN 100 DOGS [J].
BURK, RL .
VETERINARY RADIOLOGY & ULTRASOUND, 1992, 33 (03) :177-180
[2]   Imprint and brush cytology in the diagnosis of canine intranasal tumours [J].
Clercx, C ;
Wallon, J ;
Gilbert, S ;
Snaps, F ;
Coignoul, F .
JOURNAL OF SMALL ANIMAL PRACTICE, 1996, 37 (09) :423-427
[3]   PRIMARY NEOPLASMS OF NASAL CAVITY, PARA-NASAL SINUSES AND NASOPHARYNX IN DOG - REPORT OF 16 CASES FROM FILES OF AFIP [J].
CONFER, AW ;
DEPAOLI, A .
VETERINARY PATHOLOGY, 1978, 15 (01) :18-30
[4]  
GIBBS C, 1979, J SMALL ANIM PRACT, V20, P515, DOI 10.1111/j.1748-5827.1979.tb06760.x
[5]  
LEGENDRE AM, 1983, J AM ANIM HOSP ASSOC, V19, P115
[6]  
MACEWEN EG, 1977, J AM VET MED ASSOC, V170, P45
[7]  
MADWELL BR, 1976, AM J VET RES, V37, P851
[8]   Long-term outcome of 56 dogs with nasal tumours treated with four doses of radiation at intervals of seven days [J].
Mellanby, RJ ;
Stevenson, RK ;
Herrtage, ME ;
White, RAS ;
Dobson, JM .
VETERINARY RECORD, 2002, 151 (09) :253-+
[9]   Results of a prospective multicenter study for evaluation of the diagnostic duality of an open whole-body low-field MRI unit. A comparison with high-field MRI measured by the applicable gold standard [J].
Merl, T ;
Scholz, M ;
Gerhardt, P ;
Langer, M ;
Laubenberger, J ;
Weiss, HD ;
Gehl, HB ;
Wolf, KJ ;
Ohnesorge, I .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1999, 30 (01) :43-53
[10]   MR, CT AND CLINICAL-FEATURES FROM 4 DOGS WITH NASAL TUMORS INVOLVING THE ROSTRAL CEREBRUM [J].
MOORE, MP ;
GAVIN, PR ;
KRAFT, SL ;
DEHAAN, CE ;
LEATHERS, CW ;
DORN, RV .
VETERINARY RADIOLOGY, 1991, 32 (01) :19-25