A quantum cognition model for bridging stated and revealed preference

被引:11
作者
Yu, Jiangbo Gabriel [1 ]
Jayakrishnan, R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Inst Transport Studies, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 4000 Anteater Instruct & Res Bldg AIRB, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
关键词
Quantum cognition; Stated preference; Revealed preference; Travel survey; Travel behavior; CHOICE; ACTIVATION; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.trb.2018.10.014
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Despite increasingly abundant data on revealed travel behaviors, stated preference surveys still play an indispensable role in analyzing and predicting human behaviors in hypothetical scenarios. Recent needs for forecasting travel behaviors in the era of autonomous vehicles and more prevalent sharing economy are examples. However, it is well known that the framing effect in surveys could be significant when asking the same question with different modes, instruments, and wordings. Moreover, systematic deviation is observed when stated preference and revealed preference are compared, per a growing body of studies, due to the framing effect, the change of decision context, and the altered mental states of participants. These situations resemble two prevalent quantum phenomena - measurement influences the state of a system, and different observation sequences on a system render different results. This paper proposes a quantum cognition model consistent with quantum logic and demonstrates its usefulness in the quantitative study of stated and revealed preference. Examples show how to calibrate the model and forecast revealed preference when only stated preference is available. Although the proposed model is not limited to the number of questions, the examples focus on single-question scenarios. This paper takes a utilitarian perspective on quantum mechanics and demonstrates how it could improve survey designs and prediction on revealed preference. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:263 / 280
页数:18
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Using stated preference data for studying the effect of advanced traffic information on drivers' route choice [J].
AbdelAty, MA ;
Kitamura, R ;
Jovanis, PP .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 1997, 5 (01) :39-50
[2]  
Aerts D., 1995, FOUND SCI, V1, P85, DOI [10.1007/BF00208726, DOI 10.1007/BF00208726]
[3]  
[Anonymous], BOUNDED RATIONALITY
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, INFORM DYNAMICS COGN
[5]  
[Anonymous], THEOR COMPUT SCI
[6]  
[Anonymous], P NAT HOUS TRAV SURV
[7]   Hybrid choice models: Progress and challenges [J].
Ben-Akiva, M ;
Mcfadden, D ;
Train, K ;
Walker, J ;
Bhat, C ;
Bierlaire, M ;
Bolduc, D ;
Boersch-Supan, A ;
Brownstone, D ;
Bunch, DS ;
Daly, A ;
De Palma, A ;
Gopinath, D ;
Karlstrom, A ;
Munizaga, MA .
MARKETING LETTERS, 2002, 13 (03) :163-175
[8]  
Ben-Akiva M., 1994, Mark. Lett, V5, P335, DOI [DOI 10.1007/BF00999209, 10.1007/BF00999209]
[9]   ESTIMATION OF SWITCHING MODELS FROM REVEALED PREFERENCES AND STATED INTENTIONS [J].
BENAKIVA, M ;
MORIKAWA, T .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 1990, 24 (06) :485-495
[10]   The multiple discrete-continuous extreme value (MDCEV) model: Role of utility function parameters, identification considerations, and model extensions [J].
Bhat, Chandra R. .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2008, 42 (03) :274-303