Characterization of inhomogeneous samples by spectroscopic Mueller polarimetry

被引:0
作者
Foldyna, M. [1 ]
De Martino, A. [1 ]
Ossikovski, R. [1 ]
Garcia-Caurel, E. [1 ]
Cattelan, D. [2 ]
Licitra, C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Ecole Polytech, CNRS, UMR7647, Phys Interfaces & Couches Minces Lab, F-91128 Palaiseau, France
[2] Grp HORIBA, Dept Couches Minces Jobin Yvon, F-91380 Chilly Mazarin, France
[3] MINATEC, CEA LETI, F-38054 Grenoble 9, France
来源
LITHOGRAPHY ASIA 2008 | 2008年 / 7140卷
关键词
Gratings; metrology; Mueller polarimetry; inhomogeneous samples; depolarization; finite spot size;
D O I
10.1117/12.804690
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Light depolarization occurs whenever different polarization responses add up incoherently, as it may be the case with inhomogeneous samples. The most convenient technique to characterize such samples is Mueller matrix polarimetry, as it is the only one providing all the relevant information in presence of depolarization. We studied the case of small grating boxes surrounded by bare silicon, in conditions where both the gratings and the substrate were illuminated by the Mueller polarimeter beam. The grating optical response is modeled by using rigorous coupled-waves analysis, and added incoherently to that of the substrate by merely summing the corresponding Mueller matrices. The line width and the depth of the grating as well as the percentage of substrate in irradiated spot area were obtained by fitting the experimental data taken with controlled displacement of the light spot in the boundary region between grating and substrate. Accurate grating parameters could be obtained with the fraction of the spot area within the grating box was larger than 30%. Moreover, these parameters remained relatively constant when this fraction was further decreased to 5%.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1975, PRINCIPLES OPTICS
[3]   An interior trust region approach for nonlinear minimization subject to bounds [J].
Coleman, TF ;
Li, YY .
SIAM JOURNAL ON OPTIMIZATION, 1996, 6 (02) :418-445
[4]   General and self-consistent method for the calibration of polarization modulators, polarimeters, and Mueller-matrix ellipsometers [J].
Compain, E ;
Poirier, S ;
Drevillon, B .
APPLIED OPTICS, 1999, 38 (16) :3490-3502
[5]   Spectroscopic Mueller polarimeter based on liquid crystal devices [J].
Garcia-Caurel, E ;
De Martino, A ;
Drévillon, B .
THIN SOLID FILMS, 2004, 455 :120-123
[6]   A DEPOLARIZATION CRITERION IN MUELLER MATRICES [J].
GIL, JJ ;
BERNABEU, E .
OPTICA ACTA, 1985, 32 (03) :259-261
[7]   DEPOLARIZATION AND POLARIZATION INDEXES OF AN OPTICAL-SYSTEM [J].
GIL, JJ ;
BERNABEU, E .
OPTICA ACTA, 1986, 33 (02) :185-189
[8]   A new calculus for the treatment of optical systems I. Description and discussion of the calculus [J].
Jones, RC .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1941, 31 (07) :488-493
[9]   Simulation of the depolarization effect in porous silicon [J].
Jun, KH ;
Lim, KS .
APPLIED OPTICS, 2003, 42 (07) :1211-1215
[10]   RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN JONES AND MUELLER MATRICES FOR RANDOM-MEDIA [J].
KIM, K ;
MANDEL, L ;
WOLF, E .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1987, 4 (03) :433-437