Alternating Current Stimulation for Vision Restoration after Optic Nerve Damage: A Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:90
作者
Gall, Carolin [1 ]
Schmidt, Sein [2 ]
Schittkowski, Michael P. [3 ]
Antal, Andrea [4 ]
Ambrus, Geza Gergely [4 ]
Paulus, Walter [4 ]
Dannhauer, Moritz [5 ,6 ]
Michalik, Romualda [1 ]
Mante, Alf [2 ]
Bola, Michal [1 ]
Lux, Anke [7 ]
Kropf, Siegfried [7 ]
Brandt, Stephan A. [2 ]
Sabel, Bernhard A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Magdeburg, Fac Med, Inst Med Psychol, Magdeburg, Germany
[2] Charite, Dept Neurol, Berlin, Germany
[3] Univ Gottingen, Dept Ophthalmol, Univ Med Ctr, Gottingen, Germany
[4] Univ Gottingen, Dept Clin Neurophysiol, Univ Med Ctr, Gottingen, Germany
[5] Univ Utah, Ctr Integrat Biomed Comp, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[6] Univ Utah, Sci Comp & Imaging Inst, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[7] Univ Magdeburg, Inst Biometry & Med Informat, Magdeburg, Germany
来源
PLOS ONE | 2016年 / 11卷 / 06期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; BRAIN-STIMULATION; ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; IMPROVES VISION; FIELDS; EEG;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0156134
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Vision loss after optic neuropathy is considered irreversible. Here, repetitive transorbital alternating current stimulation (rtACS) was applied in partially blind patients with the goal of activating their residual vision. Methods We conducted a multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial in an ambulatory setting with daily application of rtACS (n = 45) or sham-stimulation (n = 37) for 50 min for a duration of 10 week days. A volunteer sample of patients with optic nerve damage (mean age 59.1 yrs) was recruited. The primary outcome measure for efficacy was super-threshold visual fields with 48 hrs after the last treatment day and at 2-months follow-up. Secondary outcome measures were near-threshold visual fields, reaction time, visual acuity, and resting-state EEGs to assess changes in brain physiology. Results The rtACS-treated group had a mean improvement in visual field of 24.0% which was significantly greater than after sham-stimulation (2.5%). This improvement persisted for at least 2 months in terms of both within-and between-group comparisons. Secondary analyses revealed improvements of near-threshold visual fields in the central 5 degrees and increased thresholds in static perimetry after rtACS and improved reaction times, but visual acuity did not change compared to shams. Visual field improvement induced by rtACS was associated with EEG power-spectra and coherence alterations in visual cortical networks which are interpreted as signs of neuromodulation. Current flow simulation indicates current in the frontal cortex, eye, and optic nerve and in the subcortical but not in the cortical regions. Conclusion rtACS treatment is a safe and effective means to partially restore vision after optic nerve damage probably by modulating brain plasticity. This class 1 evidence suggests that visual fields can be improved in a clinically meaningful way.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Modulates Large-Scale Cortical Network Activity by Network Resonance
    Ali, Mohsin M.
    Sellers, Kristin K.
    Frohlich, Flavio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 33 (27) : 11262 - 11275
  • [2] Electrical stimulation and visual network plasticity
    Antal, Andrea
    Paulus, Walter
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    [J]. RESTORATIVE NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 29 (06) : 365 - 374
  • [3] Brain functional connectivity network breakdown and restoration in blindness
    Bola, Michal
    Gall, Carolin
    Moewes, Christian
    Fedorov, Anton
    Hinrichs, Hermann
    Sabel, Bernhard A.
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2014, 83 (06) : 542 - 551
  • [4] Disturbed temporal dynamics of brain synchronization in vision loss
    Bola, Michal
    Gall, Carolin
    Sabel, Bernhard A.
    [J]. CORTEX, 2015, 67 : 134 - 146
  • [5] Dynamic reorganization of brain functional networks during cognition
    Bola, Michal
    Sabel, Bernhard A.
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2015, 114 : 398 - 413
  • [6] Noninvasive brain stimulation in the treatment of aphasia: Exploring interhemispheric relationships and their implications for neurorehabilitation
    Chrysikou, Evangelia G.
    Hamilton, Roy H.
    [J]. RESTORATIVE NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 29 (06) : 375 - 394
  • [7] Uncovering the connectivity of the brain in relation to novel vision rehabilitation strategies
    Connell, Nyssa
    Merabet, Lotfi B.
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2014, 83 (06) : 484 - 485
  • [8] Modeling of the Human Skull in EEG Source Analysis
    Dannhauer, Moritz
    Lanfer, Benjamin
    Wolters, Carsten H.
    Knoesche, Thomas R.
    [J]. HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2011, 32 (09) : 1383 - 1399
  • [9] Visualizing simulated electrical fields from electroencephalography and transcranial electric brain stimulation: A comparative evaluation
    Eichelbaum, Sebastian
    Dannhauer, Moritz
    Hlawitschka, Mario
    Brooks, Dana
    Koensche, Thomas R.
    Scheuermann, Gerik
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2014, 101 : 513 - 530
  • [10] Retinal Origin of Electrically Evoked Potentials in Response to Transcorneal Alternating Current Stimulation in the Rat
    Foik, Andrzej T.
    Kublik, Ewa
    Sergeeva, Elena G.
    Tatlisumak, Turgut
    Rossini, Paolo M.
    Sabel, Bernhard A.
    Waleszczyk, Wioletta J.
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2015, 56 (03) : 1711 - 1718