A fuzzy-based integrated framework for supply chain risk assessment

被引:120
作者
Aqlan, Faisal [1 ]
Lam, Sarah S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Behrend Coll, Dept Ind Engn, Erie, PA 16563 USA
[2] SUNY Binghamton, Dept Syst Sci & Ind Engn, Binghamton, NY 13902 USA
关键词
Fuzzy logic; Bow-Tie analysis; Risk management; Risk aggregation; Server manufacturing; BOW-TIE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.11.013
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This research presents an integrated framework for supply chain risk assessment. The framework consists of three main components: survey, Bow-Tie analysis, and fuzzy inference system (FIS). The survey component consists of questionnaires used to identify the risk factors and their likelihoods and impacts. Potential risks are identified based on experts' knowledge, historical data, and supply chain structure. The identified risks are measured by aggregating the estimated values of risk parameters. Bow-Tie, which is a diagram that displays the links between potential causes, preventative and mitigative controls and consequences of a risk, is used to calculate the aggregated likelihood and impact of the risk. FIS is then used to calculate the total risk score considering the risk management parameters and risk predictability. A case study from a high-end server manufacturing environment is considered. For the two main product types produced by the company, risks are assessed and aggregated per product type. Given the individual and aggregated risk scores, decision makers can either perform top-down or bottom-up risk analysis and focus on the significant risks that could affect their business operations. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:54 / 63
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Integrating lean principles and fuzzy bow-tie analysis for risk assessment in chemical industry [J].
Aqlan, Faisal ;
Ali, Ebrahim Mustafa .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2014, 29 :39-48
[2]   Measuring the supply chain risk and vulnerability in frequency space [J].
Bogataj, David ;
Bogataj, Marija .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2007, 108 (1-2) :291-301
[3]  
Buchmeister B., 2006, Advances in Production Engineering & Management, V1, P30
[4]   An agent-based simulation model of enterprises financial distress for the enterprise of different life cycle stage [J].
Cao, Yu ;
Chen, Xiao-hong .
SIMULATION MODELLING PRACTICE AND THEORY, 2012, 20 (01) :70-88
[5]   Supply chain redesign for resilience using simulation [J].
Carvalho, Helena ;
Barroso, Ana P. ;
Machado, Virginia H. ;
Azevedo, Susana ;
Cruz-Machado, V. .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2012, 62 (01) :329-341
[6]   MODELING AND SIMULATING SUPPLY CHAIN SCHEDULE RISK [J].
Finke, Gandolf R. ;
Schmitt, Amanda J. ;
Singh, Mahender .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2010 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE, 2010, :3472-3481
[7]   A multi-agent based framework for supply chain risk management [J].
Giannakis, Mihalis ;
Louis, Michalis .
JOURNAL OF PURCHASING AND SUPPLY MANAGEMENT, 2011, 17 (01) :23-31
[8]   A stochastic model for risk management in global supply chain networks [J].
Goh, Mark ;
Lim, Joseph Y. S. ;
Meng, Fanwen .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2007, 182 (01) :164-173
[9]   Association between supply chain glitches and operating performance [J].
Hendricks, KB ;
Singhal, VR .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2005, 51 (05) :695-711
[10]   Risk Uncertainty and Supply Chain Decisions: A Real Options Perspective [J].
Hult, G. Tomas M. ;
Craighead, Christopher W. ;
Ketchen, David J., Jr. .
DECISION SCIENCES, 2010, 41 (03) :435-458