Stress management interventions among socioeconomically disadvantaged parents: A meta-analysis and moderation analysis

被引:8
作者
Ling, Jiying [1 ]
Zahry, Nagwan R. [2 ]
Liu, Cheng-Ching [1 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Coll Nursing, 1355 Bogue St, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Univ Tennessee, Chattanooga Dept Commun, Lupton Hall,520 Oak St, Chattanooga, TN 37403 USA
关键词
Stress; Depression; Anxiety; Parents; Poverty; Low-income; Low socioeconomic; Socioeconomically disadvantaged; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; COGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL THERAPY; LOW-INCOME; SALIVARY CORTISOL; HIGH-RISK; OUTCOMES; COMMUNITY; CHILDREN; PROGRAM; POVERTY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103954
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: Socioeconomically disadvantaged parents experience high levels of stress, anxiety, and depression. Many interventions have been tested to reduce parental stress, but no meta-analysis has been conducted to quantitatively summarize the effects and explore the moderators of intervention effects among socioeconomically disadvantaged parents. Objective: This meta-analysis aimed to (1) quantitatively examine the intervention effects of prior stress management interventions among socioeconomically disadvantaged parents on reducing stress, depression, and anxiety; and (2) explore the potential moderators of intervention effects. Methods: Six databases, including CINAHL, PubMed, PsycINFO, Sociological Abstracts, Web of Science, and Cochrane, were searched in February 2021. After a two-step literature screening by two independent reviewers, 45 eligible articles were retained. Two evaluators independently assessed each eligible study's quality using the Evidence Project risk of bias tool. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement guided the report. Meta-analyses (random-effects model) and moderation analyses (mixed-effects model) were performed. Results: Previous stress management interventions had a small effect of -0.24 in reducing parental stress (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.33, -0.15) with a 7.6-month follow-up effect of -0.12 (95% CI: -0.27, 0.04). The pooled effects on reducing depression were -0.15 (95% CI: -0.26, -0.04) with a 9-month follow-up effect of 0.02 (95% CI: -0.21, 0.26). Two studies measured anxiety, and the average effects were -0.03 (95% CI: -0.16, 0.11). Intervention effects on stress were significantly moderated by country (p = .005), study design (p < .001), and intervention duration (p = .030). Interventions conducted in developing countries (g = -0.52) had a significantly larger effect in reducing stress than those conducted in developed countries (g = -0.19). Studies using a quasi-experimental design (g = -0.47) resulted in a significantly greater effect in reducing stress than RCTs (g = -0.12). Interventions with a duration of 1-3 months (g = -0.36) had a greater effect in reducing stress than those with a longer duration (g = -0.11 for 3-6 months, -0.20 for >6 months). Intervention effects on reducing depression were significantly moderated by intervention component (p = .030). Cognitive behavioral therapy (g = -0.20) and mindfulness-based interventions (g = -0.16) resulted in greater effects in reducing depression than interventions focusing on parenting/life/self-care skills (g = 0.003). Conclusions: Previous stress management interventions have short-term beneficial effects on reducing parental stress and depression, but long-term follow-up effects are limited. Short-duration (1-3 months) mindfulness-based interventions and cognitive behavioral therapy in clinical settings are recommended for socioeconomically disadvantaged parents to reduce stress and depression. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]   Comparison of pharmacists' mental health literacy: Developed versus developing countries [J].
Aluh, Deborah Oyine ;
Anyachebelu, Obinna Chukwudi ;
Ajaraonye, Chukwuemerie Ifeanyi .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION, 2020, 60 (05) :S64-S72
[2]  
American Psychological Association, 2020, Stress in the time of COVID-19
[3]   Vulnerability to Multi-Dimensional Poverty: An Empirical Comparison of Alternative Measurement Approaches [J].
Azeem, Muhammad Masood ;
Mugera, Amin W. ;
Schilizzi, Steven .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2018, 54 (09) :1612-1636
[4]  
Balk EM., 2012, AHRQ METHODS EFFECTI
[5]   Time-to-update of systematic reviews relative to the availability of new evidence [J].
Bashir, Rabia ;
Surian, Didi ;
Dunn, Adam G. .
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2018, 7
[6]  
Bennett C., 2013, Journal for the Society for Social Work and Research, V4, P300, DOI DOI 10.5243/JSSWR.2013.20
[7]   Impact of an Internet-Based Lifestyle Intervention on Behavioral and Psychosocial Factors During Postpartum Weight Loss [J].
Bennion, Kelly A. ;
Tate, Deborah ;
Munoz-Christian, Karen ;
Phelan, Suzanne .
OBESITY, 2020, 28 (10) :1860-1867
[8]   Poverty, Stress, and Brain Development: New Directions for Prevention and Intervention [J].
Blair, Clancy ;
Raver, C. Cybele .
ACADEMIC PEDIATRICS, 2016, 16 (03) :S30-S36
[9]  
Borenstein M., 2019, Common Mistakes in Meta-Analysis and How to Avoid Them
[10]  
Borenstein M., 2021, Introduction to meta-analysis