BROKERAGE AND BROKERING: AN INTEGRATIVE REVIEW AND ORGANIZING FRAMEWORK FOR THIRD PARTY INFLUENCE

被引:109
作者
Halevy, Nir [1 ]
Halali, Eliran [2 ]
Zlatev, Julian J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Org Behav, Grad Sch Business, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Bar Ilan Univ, Social & Org Psychol, Dept Psychol, Ramat Gan, Israel
[3] Harvard Univ, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
基金
以色列科学基金会;
关键词
SOCIAL NETWORK RESEARCH; STRUCTURAL HOLES; CONFLICT TEMPLATES; TERTIUS IUNGENS; GOSSIP; INTERVENTION; CREATIVITY; SITUATION; WORK; COLLABORATION;
D O I
10.5465/annals.2017.0024
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Brokerage and brokering are pervasive and consequential organizational phenomena. Prevailing models underscore social structure and focus on the consequences that come from brokerage-occupying a bridging position between disconnected others in a network. By contrast, emerging models underscore social interactions and focus on brokering-the behavioral processes through which organizational actors shape others' relationships. Our review led us to develop a novel framework as a means to integrate and organize a wide range of theoretical insights and empirical findings on brokerage and brokering. The Changing Others' Relationships (COR) framework captures the following ideas that emerged from our review: (a) Different triadic configurations enable different forms of brokering, which in turn produce distinct effects on others' relationships, (b) brokering is a multifaceted social influence process that can take the form of intermediation (connecting disconnected others) or modification (changing others' preexisting relationships), (c) comparing social relations prebrokering versus postbrokering reveals a broker's impact, (d) brokering can influence others' relationships positively or negatively, and (e) information and incentives are two principal means through which individuals change others' relationships. Overall, the current review integrates multiple streams of research relevant to brokerage and brokering-including those on structural holes, organizational innovation, boundary spanning, social and political skill, workplace gossip, third-party conflict managers, and labor relations-and links each of the emergent themes identified in the current review to promising directions for future research on brokerage and brokering.
引用
收藏
页码:215 / 239
页数:25
相关论文
共 141 条
[1]   WHAT YOU SEE IS WHAT YOU GET? ENHANCING METHODOLOGICAL TRANSPARENCY IN MANAGEMENT RESEARCH [J].
Aguinis, Herman ;
Ramani, Ravi S. ;
Alabduljader, Nawaf .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT ANNALS, 2018, 12 (01) :83-110
[2]   Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study [J].
Ahuja, G .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2000, 45 (03) :425-455
[3]   When the Bases of Social Hierarchy Collide: Power Without Status Drives Interpersonal Conflict [J].
Anicich, Eric M. ;
Fast, Nathanael J. ;
Halevy, Nir ;
Galinsky, Adam D. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2016, 27 (01) :123-140
[4]   Matchmaking Promotes Happiness [J].
Anik, Lalin ;
Norton, Michael I. .
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PERSONALITY SCIENCE, 2014, 5 (06) :644-652
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2003, ATLAS INTERPERSONAL
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2016, 2601338 SSRN ID
[8]   Ombudspersons or peers? The effect of third-party expertise and recommendations on negotiation [J].
Arnold, JA ;
O'Connor, KM .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 84 (05) :776-785
[9]   The Strength-of-Weak-Ties Perspective on Creativity: A Comprehensive Examination and Extension [J].
Baer, Markus .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 95 (03) :592-601
[10]  
Balliet D., 2017, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V115, P716