CORPORATE PHILANTHROPY AND CORPORATE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE: THE ROLES OF STAKEHOLDER RESPONSE AND POLITICAL ACCESS

被引:901
作者
Wang, Heli [1 ]
Qian, Cuili [2 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] City Univ Hong Kong, Coll Business, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
FIRM PERFORMANCE; SOCIAL PERFORMANCE; CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS; PROPERTY-RIGHTS; GOVERNANCE; TRANSITION; CONNECTIONS; REPUTATION; OWNERSHIP; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.5465/amj.2009.0548
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Corporate philanthropy is expected to positively affect firm financial performance because it helps firms gain sociopolitical legitimacy, which enables them to elicit positive stakeholder responses and to gain political access. The positive philanthropy-performance relationship is stronger for firms with greater public visibility and for those with better past performance, as philanthropy by these firms gains more positive stakeholder responses. Firms that are not government-owned or politically well connected were shown to benefit more from philanthropy, as gaining political resources is more critical for such firms. Empirical analyses using data on Chinese firms listed on stock exchanges from 2001 to 2006 support these arguments.
引用
收藏
页码:1159 / 1181
页数:23
相关论文
共 105 条
[61]   Political connections, financing and firm performance: Evidence from Chinese private firms [J].
Li, Hongbin ;
Meng, Lingsheng ;
Wang, Qian ;
Zhou, Li-An .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2008, 87 (02) :283-299
[62]   Why do entrepreneurs enter politics? Evidence from China [J].
Li, Hongbin ;
Meng, Lingsheng ;
Zhang, Junsen .
ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 2006, 44 (03) :559-578
[63]   Tocquevillian moments: Charitable contributions by Chinese private entrepreneurs [J].
Ma, Dali ;
Parish, William L. .
SOCIAL FORCES, 2006, 85 (02) :943-964
[64]  
Margolis J.D., 2007, Does it Pay to Be Good? A Meta-Analysis and Redirection of Research on the Relationship between Corporate Social and Financial Performance, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.1866371, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.1866371]
[65]   Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business [J].
Margolis, JD ;
Walsh, JP .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2003, 48 (02) :268-305
[66]   Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective [J].
McWilliams, A ;
Siegel, D .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2001, 26 (01) :117-127
[67]  
MEZNAR MB, 1995, ACAD MANAGE J, V38, P975, DOI 10.5465/256617
[68]   WHY "GOOD" FIRMS DO BAD THINGS: THE EFFECTS OF HIGH ASPIRATIONS, HIGH EXPECTATIONS, AND PROMINENCE ON THE INCIDENCE OF CORPORATE ILLEGALITY [J].
Mishina, Yuri ;
Dykes, Bernadine J. ;
Block, Emily S. ;
Pollock, Timothy G. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2010, 53 (04) :701-722
[70]  
Neiheisel Steven., 1994, Corporate Strategy and the Politics of Goodwill