Risk assessment of the blunt trauma victim: The role of the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score (qSOFA)

被引:20
作者
Jawa, Randeep S. [1 ]
Vosswinkel, James A. [1 ]
McCormack, Jane E. [1 ]
Huang, Emily C. [1 ]
Thode, Henry C., Jr. [2 ]
Shapiro, Marc J. [1 ]
Singer, Adam J. [2 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Stony Brook, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Trauma, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
[2] SUNY Stony Brook, Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
关键词
Trauma; qSOFA; Injury; Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment; INTERNATIONAL CONSENSUS DEFINITIONS; SEPTIC SHOCK SEPSIS-3; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT; VALIDATION; ACCURACY; CRITERIA; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.05.011
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: A number or risk assessment tools are used in trauma victims. Because of its simplicity, we examined the ability of the recently described quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score (qSOFA) to predict outcomes in blunt trauma patients presenting to the Emergency Department. Methods: We queried the trauma registry at a Level 1 Trauma Center for all adult blunt trauma admissions between 1/1/10 and 9/30/15. qSOFA scores were the sum of binary scores for 3 variables (RR >= 22, SBP <= 100 mmHg, and GCS <= 13). Results: There were 7064 admissions (5664 admissions had qSOFA = 0, 1164 had qSOFA = 1, 223 had qSOFA = 2, and 13 had qSOFA = 3). Higher qSOFA scores were associated with greater injury severity, increased ICU admission, and higher complication rates. qSOFA scores were associated with in-hospital mortality (1.7% with qSOFA = 0; 8.7% with qSOFA = 1; 22.4% with qSOFA = 2; 23.1% with qSOFA = 3; p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, qSOFA score was an independent predictor of mortality. Conclusions: qSOFA scores are directly associated with adverse outcomes in blunt trauma victims. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:397 / 401
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
American College of Surgeon National Trauma Data Bank, NAT TRAUM DAT STAND
[2]  
[Anonymous], AM FACT FIND
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, ADV TRAUM LIF SUPP
[4]   EVALUATING TRAUMA CARE - THE TRISS METHOD [J].
BOYD, CR ;
TOLSON, MA ;
COPES, WS .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1987, 27 (04) :370-378
[5]   A REVISION OF THE TRAUMA SCORE [J].
CHAMPION, HR ;
SACCO, WJ ;
COPES, WS ;
GANN, DS ;
GENNARELLI, TA ;
FLANAGAN, ME .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1989, 29 (05) :623-629
[6]   Predicting outcome after multiple trauma: which scoring system? [J].
Chawda, MN ;
Hildebrand, F ;
Pape, HC ;
Giannoudis, PV .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2004, 35 (04) :347-358
[7]   Comparison of current injury scales for survival chance estimation: An evaluation comparing the predictive performance of the ISS, NISS, and AP scores in a dutch local trauma registration [J].
Frankema, SPG ;
Steyerberg, EW ;
Edwards, MJR ;
van Vugt, AB .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2005, 58 (03) :596-604
[8]   Prognostic Accuracy of Sepsis-3 Criteria for In-Hospital Mortality Among Patients With Suspected Infection Presenting to the Emergency Department [J].
Freund, Yonathan ;
Lemachatti, Najla ;
Krastinova, Evguenia ;
Van Laer, Marie ;
Claessens, Yann-Erick ;
Avondo, Aurelie ;
Occelli, Celine ;
Feral-Pierssens, Anne-Laure ;
Truchot, Jennifer ;
Ortega, Mar ;
Carneiro, Bruno ;
Pernet, Julie ;
Claret, Pierre-Geraud ;
Dami, Fabrice ;
Bloom, Ben ;
Riou, Bruno ;
Beaune, Sebastien .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2017, 317 (03) :301-308
[9]   Improving the Glasgow Coma Scale score: Motor score alone is a better predictor [J].
Healey, C ;
Osler, TM ;
Rogers, FB ;
Healey, MA ;
Glance, LG ;
Kilgo, PD ;
Shackford, SR ;
Meredith, JW .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2003, 54 (04) :671-678
[10]   Value of anatomic and physiologic scoring systems in outcome prediction of trauma patients [J].
Kahloul, Mohamed ;
Bouida, Wahid ;
Boubaker, Hamdi ;
Toumi, Semir ;
Grissa, Mohamed H. ;
Jaafar, Amira ;
Louzi, Moez ;
Boukef, Riadh ;
Gahbiche, Mourad ;
Nouira, Semir .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2014, 21 (02) :125-129