Management of Renal Masses and Localized Renal Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:324
作者
Pierorazio, Phillip M. [1 ]
Johnson, Michael H. [1 ]
Patel, Hiten D. [1 ]
Sozio, Stephen M. [2 ,3 ]
Sharma, Ritu [4 ]
Iyoha, Emmanuel [4 ]
Bass, Eric B. [4 ]
Allaf, Mohamad E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, James Buchanan Brady Urol Inst, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Dept Med, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Welch Ctr Prevent Epidemiol & Clin Res, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Sch Publ Hlth, Johns Hopkins Evidence Based Practice Ctr, Baltimore, MD USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
carcinoma; renal cell; comparative effectiveness research; disease management; kidney neoplasms; surgical procedures; operative; NEPHRON-SPARING SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY; CELL CARCINOMA; FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES; RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; TUMORS LARGER; CLINICAL T1B; CM;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2016.04.081
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Several options exist for management of clinically localized renal masses suspicious for cancer, including active surveillance, thermal ablation and radical or partial nephrectomy. We summarize evidence on effectiveness and comparative effectiveness of these treatment approaches for patients with a renal mass suspicious for localized renal cell carcinoma. Materials and Methods: We searched MEDLINE (R), Embase (R) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from January 1, 1997 through May 1, 2015. Paired investigators independently screened articles to identify controlled studies of management options or cohort studies of active surveillance, abstracted data sequentially and assessed risk of bias independently. Strength of evidence was graded by comparisons. Results: The search identified 107 studies (majority T1, no active surveillance or thermal ablation stratified outcomes of T2 tumors). Cancer specific survival was excellent among all management strategies (median 5-year survival 95%). Local recurrence-free survival was inferior for thermal ablation with 1 treatment but reached equivalence to other modalities after multiple treatments. Overall survival rates were similar among management strategies and varied with age and comorbidity. End-stage renal disease rates were low for all strategies (0.4% to 2.8%). Radical nephrectomy was associated with the largest decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate and highest incidence of chronic kidney disease. Thermal ablation offered the most favorable perioperative outcomes. Partial nephrectomy showed the highest rates of urological complications but overall rates of minor/major complications were similar among interventions. Strength of evidence was moderate, low and insufficient for 11, 22 and 30 domains, respectively. Conclusions: Comparative studies demonstrated similar cancer specific survival across management strategies, with some differences in renal functional outcomes, perioperative outcomes and postoperative harms that should be considered when choosing a management strategy.
引用
收藏
页码:989 / 998
页数:10
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2014, METHODS GUIDE EFFECT
[2]  
[Anonymous], RISK BIAS ASS TOOL N
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, CANC FACTS FIG 2014
[4]   Elective partial nephrectomy is equivalent to radical nephrectomy in patients with clinical T1 renal cell carcinoma: results of a retrospective, comparative, multi-institutional study [J].
Antonelli, Alessandro ;
Ficarra, Vincenzo ;
Bertini, Roberto ;
Carini, Marco ;
Carmignani, Giorgio ;
Corti, Serena ;
Longo, Nicola ;
Martorana, Giuseppe ;
Minervini, Andrea ;
Mirone, Vincenzo ;
Novara, Giacomo ;
Serni, Sergio ;
Simeone, Claudio ;
Simonato, Alchiede ;
Siracusano, Salvatore ;
Volpe, Alessandro ;
Zattoni, Filiberto ;
Cunico, Sergio Cosciani .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 109 (07) :1013-1018
[5]  
Barbalias GA, 1999, J SURG ONCOL, V72, P156, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9098(199911)72:3<156::AID-JSO8>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-T
[7]   Prognostic stratification of localized renal cell carcinoma by tumor size [J].
Bedke, Jens ;
Pritsch, Maria ;
Buse, Stephan ;
Jakobi, Hildegard ;
Elsaesser, Karl-Heinz ;
Pahernik, Sascha ;
Haferkamp, Axel ;
Hohenfellner, Markus .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 180 (01) :62-67
[8]   Evaluation of costs and morbidity associated with laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for treating small renal tumours [J].
Bensalah, Karim ;
Zeltser, Ilia ;
Tuncel, Altug ;
Cadeddu, Jeffrey ;
Lotan, Yair .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 101 (04) :467-471
[9]   Guideline for Management of the Clinical T1 Renal Mass [J].
Campbell, Steven C. ;
Novick, Andrew C. ;
Belldegrun, Arie ;
Blute, Michael L. ;
Chow, George K. ;
Derweesh, Ithaar H. ;
Faraday, Martha M. ;
Kaouk, Jihad H. ;
Leveillee, Raymond J. ;
Matin, Surena F. ;
Russo, Paul ;
Uzzo, Robert G. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 182 (04) :1271-1279
[10]   Radio Frequency Ablation versus Partial Nephrectomy for Clinical T1b Renal Cell Carcinoma: Long-Term Clinical and Oncologic Outcomes [J].
Chang, Xiaofeng ;
Zhang, Fan ;
Liu, Tieshi ;
Ji, Changwei ;
Zhao, Xiaozhi ;
Yang, Rong ;
Yan, Xiang ;
Wang, Wei ;
Guo, Hongqian .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (02) :430-435