E-Government in European Countries, a Comparative Approach Using the Principal Components Analysis

被引:16
|
作者
Androniceanu, Armenia [1 ]
Georgescu, Inna [2 ]
机构
[1] Bucharest Univ Econ Studies, Fac Adm & Publ Management, Bucharest, Romania
[2] Bucharest Univ Econ Studies, Fac Econ Cybernet Stat & Informat, Bucharest, Romania
关键词
e-government; government effectiveness; public administration; digitalization; panel Principal Component Analysis; DIGITALIZATION; GOVERNANCE; PLATFORM;
D O I
10.2478/nispa-2021-0015
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
The digitalization of public administration is a necessary condition for the economic and social development of each country. In this context, e-government is developing and diversifying its forms of implementation, contributing significantly to the efficiency of public administration, to increasing the degree of transparency and to reducing corruption in public institutions. The aim of the research was to know how the states of the European Union evolved from the point of view of e -government and what influence it had on the economic development of the analyzed states and on the European citizens during the analyzed period. For this we selected ten research variables from several databases: Eurostat, the World Bank and the United Nations E-Government Development Database (UNeGovDD) of the United Nations. The period for which we did the analysis is 2010 -2019. Using EViews 12 we applied panel Principal Component Analysis to reduce the 10-variable panel into a lower dimension of 3 principal components to find the underlying simplified structure. The three principal components retained explain about 76.5 % of the initial information. The research results show significant differences between the states analyzed, in terms of e-government, but also in terms of the impact it has on government effectiveness, controlling corruption, e-participation of European citizens and the economic development of Member States. In countries with a high level of e-government implementation, governance is efficient, corruption is low, citizen involvement is higher and economic development is faster.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 86
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Indonesia e-Government Components: A Principal Component Analysis Approach
    Firmansyah, Gerry
    Hasibuan, Zainal A.
    Sucahyo, Yudho Giri
    2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS AND INNOVATION (ICITSI), 2014, : 148 - 152
  • [2] IS THE E-GOVERNMENT A DRIVER OF FINANCIALIZATION: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM EUROPEAN COUNTRIES
    Le Thanh Ha
    Nguyen Thi Thanh Huyen
    GLOBAL ECONOMY JOURNAL, 2021, 21 (04)
  • [4] E-Government and Corruption: A Longitudinal Analysis of Countries
    Zhao, Xuejiao
    Xu, Hua Daniel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2015, 38 (06) : 410 - 421
  • [5] E-GOVERNMENT IN MAURITIUS: A PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS
    Chintamanee, Sanmukhiya
    AIMC 2017 - ASIA INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY CONFERENCE, 2018, 40 : 1019 - 1035
  • [6] Manifestations of e-government usage in post-communist European countries
    Szopinski, Tomasz
    Staniewski, Marcin W.
    INTERNET RESEARCH, 2017, 27 (02) : 199 - 210
  • [7] Evaluation and improvement of e-government: The case of European countries
    Kao, Chiang
    2015 SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDEMOCRACY & EGOVERNMENT (ICEDEG), 2015, : 104 - 107
  • [8] FINANCING OF E-GOVERNMENT PROJECTS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION COUNTRIES AND UKRAINE
    Chernetsky, S.
    Chechel, A.
    Didenko, N.
    Grytsyshen, D.
    Malyshev, K.
    FINANCIAL AND CREDIT ACTIVITY-PROBLEMS OF THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2021, 4 (39): : 68 - 76
  • [9] The impact of e-government on transparency in the European Union: a multivariate analysis
    Cifuentes-Faura, Javier
    ELECTRONIC GOVERNMENT- AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2022, 18 (01) : 105 - 118
  • [10] Towards e-Government project assessment: European approach
    Mates, Pavel
    Lechner, Tomas
    Rieger, Pavel
    Pekna, Jitka
    ZBORNIK RADOVA EKONOMSKOG FAKULTETA U RIJECI-PROCEEDINGS OF RIJEKA FACULTY OF ECONOMICS, 2013, 31 (01): : 103 - 125