'Text-work' in Research Ethics Review: The significance of documents in and beyond committee meetings

被引:3
作者
Morton, Julie [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Salford, Dept Hlth & Soc, Frederick Rd Campus,Allerton Bldg, Salford M6 6PU, Lancs, England
来源
ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-POLICIES AND QUALITY ASSURANCE | 2018年 / 25卷 / 7-8期
关键词
Organizational and institutional ethics; research ethics; legal and regulatory issues in research; human subjects regulation and oversight; empirical studies of research ethics; social science research ethics; INSTITUTIONAL ETHNOGRAPHY; INFORMED-CONSENT; TRUST; ACCOUNTABILITY;
D O I
10.1080/08989621.2018.1537790
中图分类号
R-052 [医学伦理学];
学科分类号
0101 ; 120402 ;
摘要
This article analyzes how a formal text (the Ethics Review Form) available at National Health Service Research Ethics Committees (NHSRECs) in the United Kingdom was used in meetings. Derived from the work of Dorothy Smith on incorporating texts into institutional ethnography (IE), it proposes the concept of "text work" as a way into understanding more about decision-making in ethics review and describes the extent to which this formal text shaped and influenced review work. The research study used observations of committee meetings, field-notes and interviews to produce an ethnographic mapping of Research Ethics Committees' (RECs) work. This article draws on one aspect of the research which was the process of isolating a particular, ubiquitous text and analyzing how it worked and was worked on in the meetings. The analysis contributes to contemporary discussion offering an alternative to ongoing debates about idealized ways of conducting ethics review. Finally, some tentative suggestions are made about improving training, based on and starting from the work which reviewers undertake.
引用
收藏
页码:387 / 403
页数:17
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], ETHICS RUPTURE EXPLO
  • [2] Beauchamp TL., 2019, PRINCIPLES BIOMEDICA, V8th
  • [3] An Analytic Glossary to Social Inquiry Using Institutional and Political Activist Ethnography
    Bisaillon, Laura
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2012, 11 (05): : 607 - 627
  • [4] Boden D., 1994, The business of talk: Organizations in action
  • [5] Accounting for ethos or programmes for conduct? The brave new world of research ethics committees
    Boden, Rebecca
    Epstein, Debbie
    Latimer, Joanna
    [J]. SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2009, 57 (04) : 727 - 749
  • [6] Justification and authority in institutional review board decision letters
    Clapp, Justin T.
    Gleason, Katharine A.
    Joffe, Steven
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2017, 194 : 25 - 33
  • [7] Empty ethics: the problem with informed consent
    Corrigan, O
    [J]. SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS, 2003, 25 (07) : 768 - 792
  • [8] Dingwall R., 2016, The ethics ruptions: Exploring alternatives to formal research ethics review, P25
  • [9] Dingwall Robert, 2006, J Health Serv Res Policy, V11, P193, DOI 10.1258/135581906778476580
  • [10] The research ethics review process and ethics review narratives
    Fitzgerald, Maureen H.
    Phillips, Paul A.
    Yule, Elisa
    [J]. ETHICS & BEHAVIOR, 2006, 16 (04) : 377 - 395