Posterior cervical fixation following laminectomy: a stress analysis of three techniques

被引:24
作者
Duan, Yang [1 ]
Zhang, Hui [1 ]
Min, Shao-xiong [1 ]
Zhang, Li [1 ]
Jin, An-min [1 ]
机构
[1] So Med Univ, Dept Orthopaed, Zhu Jiang Hosp, Guangzhou 510282, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Laminectomy; Finite element; Posterior cervical fixation; Stress; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; TRANSARTICULAR SCREW; PEDICLE SCREWS; SPINE; STABILIZATION; BIOMECHANICS; MYELOPATHY; ANTERIOR; SEGMENT; MIDDLE;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-011-1711-z
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this study was to compare the following three main fixation techniques: pedicle screw (PS) technique, lateral mass screw (LS) technique, and transarticular screw (TS) technique. A detailed, geometrically accurate, nonlinear C3-C7 FE model had been successfully developed and validated. Then three finite element (FE) models were reconstructed by different fixation techniques following C4-C6 level laminectomy. A compressive preload of 74 N combined with a pure moment of 1.8 Nm in flexion, extension, left-right lateral bending, and left-right axial rotation was applied to the models. The results showed that maximum von Mises stress on the fixation devices was much higher in the FE models of TS technique, compared with the models of PS and LS techniques. Furthermore, the screws inserted by TS technique had high stress concentration at the middle part of the screws. Screw inserted by PS and LS techniques had high stress concentration at the actual cap-rod-screw interface. The highest level of maximal stress was obtained with the fixation device of the TS technique. TS technique induces noticeable differences in the stress compared to the posterior cervical fixation technique, regarding the higher stress level on fixation devices.
引用
收藏
页码:1552 / 1559
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Uncinate processes and Luschka joints influence the biomechanics of the cervical spine: Quantification using a finite element model of the C5-C6 segment [J].
Clausen, JD ;
Goel, VK ;
Traynelis, VC ;
Scifert, J .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 1997, 15 (03) :342-347
[2]   Biomechanical comparison of transarticular facet screws to lateral mass plates in two-level instrumentations of the cervical spine [J].
DalCanto, RA ;
Lieberman, I ;
Inceoglu, S ;
Kayanja, M ;
Ferrara, L .
SPINE, 2005, 30 (08) :897-902
[3]  
Edidin A.A., 2006, SPINE TECHNOLOGY HDB, P63, DOI [10.1016/B978-012369390-7/50005-8, DOI 10.1016/B978-012369390-7/50005-8]
[4]   Anterior versus posterior plating in cervical corpectomy [J].
ElSaghir, H ;
Böhm, H .
ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2000, 120 (10) :549-554
[5]   Laminectomy for cervical myelopathy [J].
Epstein, NE .
SPINAL CORD, 2003, 41 (06) :317-327
[6]   Local and global subaxial cervical spine biomechanics after single-level fusion or cervical arthroplasty [J].
Finn, Michael A. ;
Brodke, Darrel S. ;
Daubs, Michael ;
Patel, Alpesh ;
Bachus, Kent N. .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2009, 18 (10) :1520-1527
[7]   Prediction of load sharing among spinal components of a C5-C6 motion segment using the finite element approach [J].
Goel, VK ;
Clausen, JD .
SPINE, 1998, 23 (06) :684-691
[8]   Laminectomy and posterior cervical plating for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: Effects on cervical alignment, spinal cord compression, and neurological outcome [J].
Houten, JK ;
Cooper, PR .
NEUROSURGERY, 2003, 52 (05) :1081-1087
[9]   Screw angulation affects bone-screw stresses and bone graft load sharing in anterior cervical corpectomy fusion with a rigid screw-plate construct: a finite element model study [J].
Hussain, Mozammil ;
Natarajan, Raghu N. ;
Fayyazi, Amir H. ;
Braaksma, Brian R. ;
Andersson, Gunnar B. J. ;
An, Howard S. .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2009, 9 (12) :1016-1023
[10]   Cervical pedicle screws versus lateral mass screws - Anatomic feasibility and biomechanical comparison [J].
Jones, EL ;
Heller, JG ;
Silcox, DH ;
Hutton, WC .
SPINE, 1997, 22 (09) :977-982