Targetoid hepatic observations on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI using LI-RADS version 2018: emphasis on hepatocellular carcinomas assigned to the LR-M category

被引:21
作者
Park, H. J. [1 ]
Kim, Y. K. [2 ,3 ]
Cha, D., I [2 ,3 ]
Ko, S. E. [2 ,3 ]
Kim, S. [2 ,3 ]
Lee, E. S. [1 ]
Ahn, S. [4 ]
机构
[1] Chung Ang Univ, Chung Ang Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Sch Med, 50 Ilwon Dong, Seoul 135710, South Korea
[3] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Samsung Med Ctr, Ctr Imaging Sci, Sch Med, 50 Ilwon Dong, Seoul 135710, South Korea
[4] Ajou Univ, Dept Math, Suwon, South Korea
关键词
DIFFUSION-WEIGHTED IMAGES; INTRAHEPATIC CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA; HEPATOBILIARY PHASE; LIVER; CAPSULE; CT; DIFFERENTIATION; CONTRAST; FEATURES; SEPTUM;
D O I
10.1016/j.crad.2020.01.002
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
AIM: To determine useful imaging features for differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) categorised as LR-M from non-HCC malignancies in using the Liver Imaging-Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) version 2018 on gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients at high-risk for HCC with surgically confirmed HCCs (n=131) and non-HCC malignancies (n=90) and who had undergone gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI were included. LI-RADS categories were assigned to identify hepatic observations defined as LR-M by two radiologists. Major and ancillary imaging features of hepatic observation with targetoid appearance including intratumoural septa were compared between HCCs and non-HCC malignancies. A classification tree analysis (CTA) was applied to differentiate high-risk HCCs from non-HCC malignancies in the LR-M category. RESULTS: A total of 36 HCCs (27.5%) and 70 non-HCC malignancies (77.8%) were assigned as LR-M. An enhancing capsule (p=0.0293), blood products in the mass (p=0.0393), non-targetoid restriction (p=0.018), and a septum (p=0.0053) were significantly predictive of HCC. On CTA, the presence of a septum was an initial predictor for a high probability of HCC followed by non-targetoid restriction. The CTA model has a sensitivity of 63.9%, specificity of 90%, and accuracy of 81.1% for differentiating HCC assigned LR-M from non-HCC malignancy. CONCLUSION: A considerable proportion of HCCs could have been categorised as LR-M as they had a targetoid appearance on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. An intratumoural septum and non-targetoid restriction as well as enhancing capsule and blood products in the mass may be useful for differentiating HCC assigned to LR-M from non-HCC malignancy on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Royal College of Radiologists.
引用
收藏
页码:478.e13 / 478.e23
页数:11
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [21] LI-RADS v2014 categorization of hepatocellular carcinoma: Intraindividual comparison between gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI
    Ji Soo Song
    Eun Jung Choi
    Seung Bae Hwang
    Hong Pil Hwang
    HyeMi Choi
    European Radiology, 2019, 29 : 401 - 410
  • [22] Gadoxetic acid-enhanced high temporal-resolution hepatic arterial-phase imaging with view-sharing technique: Impact on the LI-RADS category
    Goshima, Satoshi
    Noda, Yoshifumi
    Kajita, Kimihiro
    Kawai, Nobuyuki
    Koyasu, Hiromi
    Kawada, Hiroshi
    Matsuo, Masayuki
    Bae, Kyongtae T.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 94 : 167 - 173
  • [23] A gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI-based model using LI-RADS v2018 features for preoperatively predicting Ki-67 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma
    Liang, Yingying
    Xu, Fan
    Mou, Qiuju
    Wang, Zihua
    Xiao, Chuyin
    Zhou, Tingwen
    Zhang, Nianru
    Yang, Jing
    Wu, Hongzhen
    BMC MEDICAL IMAGING, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [24] Intra-individual comparison of gadolinium-enhanced MRI using pseudo-golden-angle radial acquisition with gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for diagnosis of HCCs using LI-RADS
    Kim, Yoon-Chul
    Min, Ji Hye
    Kim, Young Kon
    Lee, Soon Jin
    Ahn, Soohyun
    Kim, Eunju
    Peeters, Hans
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (04) : 2058 - 2068
  • [25] Added Value of a Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced Hepatocyte-phase Image to the LI-RADS System for Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Chen, Ningxin
    Motosugi, Utaroh
    Morisaka, Hiroyuki
    Ichikawa, Shintaro
    Sano, Katsuhiro
    Ichikawa, Tomoaki
    Matsuda, Masanori
    Fujii, Hideki
    Onishi, Hiroshi
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 15 (01) : 49 - 59
  • [26] LI-RADS category 5 hepatocellular carcinoma: preoperative gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI for early recurrence risk stratification after curative resection
    Hong Wei
    Hanyu Jiang
    Tianying Zheng
    Zhen Zhang
    Caiwei Yang
    Zheng Ye
    Ting Duan
    Bin Song
    European Radiology, 2021, 31 : 2289 - 2302
  • [27] Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma: LI-RADS v2017 categorisation for differential diagnosis and prognostication on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging
    Jeon, Sun Kyung
    Joo, Ijin
    Lee, Dong Ho
    Lee, Sang Min
    Kang, Hyo-Jin
    Lee, Kyoung-Bun
    Lee, Jeong Min
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (01) : 373 - 382
  • [28] Suboptimal performance of LI-RADS v2018 on gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma in liver transplant candidates
    Na Eun Oh
    Sang Hyun Choi
    Sehee Kim
    Habeen Lee
    Hyeon Ji Jang
    Jae Ho Byun
    Hyung Jin Won
    Yong Moon Shin
    European Radiology, 2024, 34 : 465 - 474
  • [29] LR- M Observations on Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Additional Features in Comparison With Current LI-RADS Criteria
    Huang, Yang
    Xian, Meng-Fei
    Xie, Wen-Xuan
    Pan, Kang-Ming
    Zeng, Dan
    Huang, Hui
    Li, Ming-De
    Xie, Xiao-Yan
    Kuang, Ming
    Lu, Ming-De
    Chen, Li-Da
    Wang, Wei
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2022, 219 (01) : 76 - 85
  • [30] LI-RADS treatment response categorization on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI: diagnostic performance compared to mRECIST and added value of ancillary features
    Kim, Se Woo
    Joo, Ijin
    Kim, Hyo-Cheol
    Ahn, Su Joa
    Kang, Hyo-Jin
    Jeon, Sun Kyung
    Lee, Jeong Min
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (05) : 2861 - 2870