Impact of Assimilating GOES-R Geostationary Lightning Mapper Flash Extent Density Data on Severe Convection Forecasts in a Warn-on-Forecast System

被引:4
作者
Wang, Yaping [1 ,2 ]
Yussouf, Nusrat [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Mansell, Edward R. [2 ]
Matilla, Brian C. [1 ,2 ]
Kong, Rong [4 ]
Xue, Ming [3 ,4 ]
Chmielewski, Vanna C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oklahoma, Cooperat Inst Mesoscale Meteorol Studies, Norman, OK 73019 USA
[2] NOAA, OAR Natl Severe Storms Lab, Norman, OK 73072 USA
[3] Univ Oklahoma, Sch Meteorol, Norman, OK 73019 USA
[4] Univ Oklahoma, Ctr Anal & Predict Storms, Norman, OK 73019 USA
关键词
Lightning; Numerical analysis/modeling; Numerical weather prediction/forecasting; Data assimilation; Ensembles; KALMAN FILTER ASSIMILATION; SHORT-TERM FORECASTS; WATER-VAPOR; SIMULATED ELECTRIFICATION; PRECIPITATION FORECASTS; IDEALIZED SIMULATIONS; RADAR DATA; PART II; ENSEMBLE; TORNADO;
D O I
10.1175/MWR-D-20-0406.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite-R (GOES-R) Geostationary Lightning Mapper (GLM) instrument detects total lightning rate at high temporal and spatial resolution over the Americas and adjacent oceanic regions. The GLM observations provide detection and monitoring of deep electrified convection. This study explores the impact of assimilating the GLM-derived flash extent density (FED) on the analyses and short-term forecasts of two severe weather events into an experimental Warn-on-Forecast system (WoFS) using the ensemble Kalman filter data assimilation technique. Sensitivity experiments are conducted using two tornadic severe storm events: one with a line of individual supercells and the other one with both isolated cells and a severe convective line. The control experiment (CTRL) assimilates conventional surface observations and geostationary satellite cloud water path into WoFS. Additional experiments also assimilate either GLM FED or radar data (RAD), or a combination of both (RAD + GLM). It is found that assimilating GLM data in the absence of radar data into the WoFS improves the short-term forecast skill over CTRL in one case, while in the other case it degrades the forecast skill by generating weaker cold pools and overly suppressing convection, mainly owing to assimilating zero FED values in the trailing stratiform regions. Assimilating unexpectedly low FED values in some regions due to low GLM detection efficiency also accounts for the poorer forecasts. Although RAD provides superior forecasts over GLM, the combination RAD +GLM shows further gains in both cases. Additional observation operators should consider different storm types and GLM detection efficiency.
引用
收藏
页码:3217 / 3241
页数:25
相关论文
共 89 条
  • [1] Alexander GD, 1999, MON WEATHER REV, V127, P1433, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1999)127<1433:TEOARR>2.0.CO
  • [2] 2
  • [3] Assimilation of Pseudo-GLM Data Using the Ensemble Kalman Filter
    Allen, Blake J.
    Mansell, Edward R.
    Dowell, David C.
    Deierling, Wiebke
    [J]. MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2016, 144 (09) : 3465 - 3486
  • [4] Baldwin M.E., 1997, 13th Conf. on Hydrology, P54
  • [5] Meteorological Imagery for the Geostationary Lightning Mapper
    Bruning, Eric C.
    Tillier, Clemens E.
    Edgington, Samantha F.
    Rudlosky, Scott D.
    Zajic, Joe
    Gravelle, Chad
    Foster, Matt
    Calhoun, Kristin M.
    Campbell, P. Adrian
    Stano, Geoffrey T.
    Schultz, Christopher J.
    Meyer, Tiffany C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2019, 124 (24) : 14285 - 14309
  • [6] A First Look at Cloud Inhomogeneity and Its Effect on Lightning Optical Emission
    Brunner, Kelcy N.
    Bitzer, Phillip M.
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 47 (10)
  • [7] A multiparameter radar case study of the microphysical and kinematic evolution of a lightning producing storm
    Carey, LD
    Rutledge, SA
    [J]. METEOROLOGY AND ATMOSPHERIC PHYSICS, 1996, 59 (1-2) : 33 - 64
  • [8] A comparison between the 4DVAR and the ensemble Kalman filter techniques for radar data assimilation
    Caya, A
    Sun, J
    Snyder, C
    [J]. MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2005, 133 (11) : 3081 - 3094
  • [9] Chang DE, 2001, MON WEATHER REV, V129, P1809, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<1809:TEOSMA>2.0.CO
  • [10] 2