Non-invasive prenatal screening for Emanuel syndrome

被引:7
|
作者
Luo, Yuqin [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Jie [2 ]
Sun, Yixi [1 ,2 ]
Qian, Yeqing [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Liya [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Min [1 ,2 ]
Dong, Minyue [1 ,2 ]
Jin, Fan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Womens Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Reprod Genet, 1 Xueshi Rd, Hangzhou 310006, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, Key Lab Reprod Genet, Minist Educ, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Univ, Womens Hosp, Ctr Reprod Med, Sch Med, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
NIPS; Emanuel syndrome (ES); Supernumerary; Microduplication; Translocation; SNP Array; PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC DIAGNOSIS; CELL-FREE DNA; CASE SERIES;
D O I
10.1186/s13039-020-0476-7
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Objective The aim of this study was to validate the results of two Emanuel syndromes detected by non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) screening using invasive methods, providing clinical performance of NIPS on chromosome microduplication detection. Methods NIPS was performed to diagnose the Emanuel syndrome. Amniocentesis or cordocentesis was performed to confirm the positive screening result of Emanuel syndrome cases. Fetal sample was detected by karyotyping, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and single nucleotide polymorphism array (SNP Array). Parental karyotyping and FISH were also carried out. Results Two cases with chromosomal abnormalities of 11q23.3q25 and 22q11.1q11.21 were found by NIPS. Chromosomal karyotyping showed that the two fetuses each have a small supernumerary marker chromosome (sSMC), SNP Array further demonstrated double duplications approximately 18 Mb in 11q23.3q25 and 3 Mb in 22q11.1q11.21. FISH confirmed that the small supernumerary marker chromosome (sSMC) was ish der(22)t(11;22) (TUPLE1+, ARSA-). Ultrasound scan and MRI showed some structure malformations in two fetuses. The two mothers were found to be a balanced carrier: 46,XX, t(11;22)(q23.3;q11.2). Conclusion NIPS could effectively identify Emanuel syndrome, which may indicate risks of a parent being a balanced rearrangement carrier. The followed confirmation test for positive sample is necessary and ensures the accuracy of the diagnosis.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Combined Model-Based Prediction for Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening
    Yang, So-Yun
    Kang, Kyung Min
    Kim, Sook-Young
    Lim, Seo Young
    Jang, Hee Yeon
    Hong, Kirim
    Cha, Dong Hyun
    Shim, Sung Han
    Joung, Je-Gun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2022, 23 (23)
  • [22] Non-invasive prenatal screening: A 20-year experience in Italy
    Palka, Chiara
    Guanciali-Franchi, Paolo
    Morizio, Elisena
    Alfonsi, Melissa
    Papponetti, Marco
    Sabbatinelli, Giulia
    Palka, Giandomenico
    Calabrese, Giuseppe
    Benn, Peter
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2019, 3
  • [23] Non-invasive prenatal screening for foetal trisomy: An assessment of reliability and reporting
    Shi, Jiping
    Tan, Ping
    Han, Dongsheng
    Zhang, Runling
    Li, Jinming
    Zhang, Rui
    CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2022, 100 : 71 - 77
  • [24] The Effect of Elevated Alanine Transaminase on Non-invasive Prenatal Screening Failures
    Chen, Ping
    Qiao, Longwei
    Zhang, Sheng
    Jin, Jieyu
    Cao, Jun
    Zhang, Yuqiong
    Tang, Haoyu
    Yu, Zheng
    Shi, Jingye
    Yin, JingPing
    Liang, Yuting
    Wu, Xiao
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [25] Non-invasive Prenatal Screening for Fetal Aneuploidy: Comparison with Cytogenetic Results
    Jeanne M. Meck
    Girish V. Putcha
    Athena M. Cherry
    Current Genetic Medicine Reports, 2015, 3 (3) : 127 - 136
  • [26] Prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with Emanuel syndrome: Results of ultrasound examination and invasive genetic testing
    Hao, Xiulan
    Wu, Jianzhu
    Fu, Wenting
    Zhang, Rui
    Zhong, Shilin
    Deng, Yuqing
    Zhu, Yunxiao
    Ye, Yanchou
    Fang, Qun
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2022, 42 (04) : 469 - 477
  • [27] Preferences for a non-invasive prenatal test as first-line screening for Down Syndrome: A discrete choice experiment
    Sim, Wen Shan
    Yeo, Seow Heong
    Choi, Christina
    Yeo, Tai Wai
    Lee, Jia Jia
    Vinh Anh Huynh
    Finkelstein, Eric Andrew
    Ozdemir, Semra
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2022, 42 (11) : 1368 - 1376
  • [28] Update in non-invasive prenatal testing
    D'Ambrosio, Valentina
    Squarcella, Antonia
    Vena, Flaminia
    Di Mascio, Daniele
    Corno, Sara
    Pajno, Cristina
    Piccioni, Maria G.
    Brunelli, Roberto
    Pizzuti, Antonio
    Benedetti Panici, Pierluigi
    Giancotti, Antonella
    MINERVA GINECOLOGICA, 2019, 71 (01): : 44 - 53
  • [29] Clinician views and experiences of non-invasive prenatal genetic screening tests in Australia
    McKinn, Shannon
    Javid, Nasrin
    Newson, Ainsley J.
    Freeman, Lucinda
    Bonner, Carissa
    Shand, Antonia W.
    Nassar, Natasha
    Bell, Katy J. L.
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 62 (06): : 830 - 837
  • [30] Principles of first trimester screening in the age of non-invasive prenatal diagnosis: screening for chromosomal abnormalities
    Kagan, Karl Oliver
    Sonek, Jiri
    Wagner, Philipp
    Hoopmann, Markus
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2017, 296 (04) : 645 - 651