Separation of elemental sulfur from zinc concentrate direct leaching residue by vacuum distillation

被引:41
作者
Li, Hailong [1 ]
Wu, Xianying [1 ]
Wang, Mingxia [2 ]
Wang, Jun [3 ]
Wu, Shaokang [1 ]
Yao, Xiaolong [1 ]
Li, Liqing [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent S Univ, Sch Energy Sci & Engn, Changsha 410083, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Huazhong Agr Univ, Coll Resource & Environm, Wuhan 430070, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Oklahoma, Hlth Sci Ctr, Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Occupat & Environm Hlth, Oklahoma City, OK 73126 USA
基金
中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Elemental sulfur; Direct leaching residue; Vacuum distillation; PRESSURE; CHALCOPYRITE;
D O I
10.1016/j.seppur.2014.09.036
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Properly disposal and reutilization of direct leaching residue (DLR) from metal production industries can reduce environmental pollution as well as better conserve resources. In this study, recovery of elemental sulfur from zinc concentrate DLR using vacuum distillation was thoroughly investigated. The results show that elemental sulfur recovery using vacuum distillation was over 98% with a high purity under optimized conditions. The low temperature requirement (200-300 degrees C) of vacuum distillation may reduce the energy consumption comparing to traditional distillation under ambient pressure. Effects of parameters (distillation time, vacuum, temperature, particle size and distillation area) on sulfur recovery rate were presented. High sulfur recovery rate was observed with relative pressure lower than -0.09 megapascal (MPa). Sulfur recovery rate increased sharply with temperature in the range of 140-220 degrees C, while temperature above 220 degrees C only slightly promoted sulfur recovery. Smaller DLR particle size and larger distillation area facilitated mass and heat transportation, and resulted in higher sulfur recovery rates. The vacuum distillation separation technology reveals an alternative method to efficiently and economically separate elemental sulfur from zinc concentrate DLR. The impacts of operation parameters on the sulfur recovery rate were well documented in this study, and they are important for further optimizing the process and strategically applying the technology in a larger scale scenario. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 46
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
General Administration of Quality Supervision Inspection and Quarantine of The People's Republic of China Standardization Administration of The People's Republic of China General Administration of Quality Supervision, 2007, SULF IND US
[2]   Pressure acid leaching of zinc sulfide concentrate [J].
Gu Yan ;
Zhang Ting-an ;
Liu Yan ;
Mu Wang-zhong ;
Zhang Wei-guang ;
Dou Zhi-he ;
Jiang Xiao-li .
TRANSACTIONS OF NONFERROUS METALS SOCIETY OF CHINA, 2010, 20 :S136-S140
[3]   Separation of elemental sulfur from hydrometallurgical residue: A review [J].
Halfyard, J. E. ;
Hawboldt, K. .
HYDROMETALLURGY, 2011, 109 (1-2) :80-89
[4]  
[黄鑫 Huang Xin], 2002, [北京科技大学学报, Journal of University Science and Technology Beijing], V24, P410
[5]  
Jia H-W., 2013, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V26, P1
[6]  
Kondo S., 2006, ADSORPTION SCI T
[7]   ZINC PRESSURE LEACHING AT HBMS [J].
KRYSA, BD .
HYDROMETALLURGY, 1995, 39 (1-3) :71-77
[8]   Recovery of elemental sulfur from zinc concentrate direct leaching residue using atmospheric distillation: A pilot-scale experimental study [J].
Li, Hailong ;
Yao, Xiaolong ;
Wang, Mingxia ;
Wu, Shaokang ;
Ma, Weiwu ;
Wei, Wenwu ;
Li, Liqing .
JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2014, 64 (01) :95-103
[9]  
Lu S. L., 2006, YUNNAN METALL, V35, P38
[10]   Pressure oxidation leaching of chalcopyrite. Part I. Comparison of high and low temperature reaction kinetics and products [J].
McDonald, R. G. ;
Muir, D. M. .
HYDROMETALLURGY, 2007, 86 (3-4) :191-205