Integration of theory and practice in social work education. Analysis of Finnish social work students' field reports

被引:7
作者
Kinni, Riitta-Liisa [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Eastern Finland, Dept Social Sci, Social Work, Kuopio, Finland
关键词
Practice learning; practice teaching; integrative pedagogy; reflection; students; category analysis; SIGNATURE PEDAGOGY; SATISFACTION;
D O I
10.1080/02615479.2020.1754385
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
In social work education, we strive for integration of theory and practice in educating research-based professionals. What do social work students think about this? Are they eager to integrate theory and practice or does practice perhaps win students' interest? The article explores how second year bachelor level social work students at a Finnish university construct themselves as learners in relation to theory and practice. The article utilizes the integrative pedagogy model, which combines different kind of knowledges needed in developing professional expertise: theoretical, practical, sociocultural, and self-regulative, reflective knowledges. Students' reflective field reports serve as data, which is analyzed by category analysis. In their reports, students categorize themselves as integrators but also as challengers. The integrators apply knowledge from university classes to practice, yearn for more theoretical knowledge, and get ideas for theses. The challengers see a gap between theory and practice and reflect university teaching critically. The integrative pedagogy model serves well in studying and developing social work practice teaching. In integrating theoretical and practical knowledges and constructing reflective knowledge, accomplished supervision, supportive sociocultural knowledge in workplaces, and collaboration between universities and social work field is needed.
引用
收藏
页码:901 / 914
页数:14
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Antaki Charles., 1998, Identities in Talk, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781446216958.N1
[2]  
Aro M., 2013, AFinLAn vuosikirja 2013. Suomen soveltavan kielitieteen yhdistyksen julkaisuja, V71, P11
[3]   THE SOURCES AND DYNAMICS OF EMOTIONS IN ENTREPRENEURSHIP EDUCATION LEARNING PROCESS [J].
Arpiainen, Riitta-Liisa ;
Lackeus, Martin ;
Taeks, Marge ;
Tynjala, Paivi .
TRAMES-JOURNAL OF THE HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2013, 17 (04) :331-346
[4]  
Baldschun A., 2018, THESIS
[5]   Integration of Learning: A Grounded Theory Analysis of College Students' Learning [J].
Barber, James P. .
AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2012, 49 (03) :590-617
[6]   Teaching Critical Reflection: A Tool for Transformative Learning in SocialWork? [J].
Bay, Uschi ;
Macfarlane, Selma .
SOCIAL WORK EDUCATION, 2011, 30 (07) :745-758
[7]   Studying the Landscape: Practice Learning for Social Work Reconsidered [J].
Bellinger, Avril .
SOCIAL WORK EDUCATION, 2010, 29 (06) :599-615
[8]   Defining Signature Pedagogy in Social Work Education: Learning Theory and the Learning Contract [J].
Boitel, Craig R. ;
Fromm, Laurentine R. .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK EDUCATION, 2014, 50 (04) :608-622
[9]   Self, others and society: a case study of university integrative learning [J].
Booth, Alan ;
McLean, Monica ;
Walker, Melanie .
STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2009, 34 (08) :929-939
[10]   The Inside Story: A Survey of Social Work Students' Supervision and Learning Opportunities on Placement [J].
Cleak, Helen ;
Roulston, Audrey ;
Vreugdenhil, Anthea .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2016, 46 (07) :2033-2050