Computer science research in Malaysia: a bibliometric analysis

被引:21
作者
Bakri, Aryati [1 ,2 ]
Willett, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Informat Sch, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Teknol Malaysia, Fak Sains Komputer Dan Sistem Maklumat, Johor Baharu, Malaysia
来源
ASLIB PROCEEDINGS | 2011年 / 63卷 / 2-3期
关键词
Computer studies; Malaysia; Publications; Research; WEB-OF-SCIENCE; H-INDEX; GOOGLE-SCHOLAR; CITATION COUNTS; SCOPUS; IMPACT; PRODUCTIVITY; INFORMATION; ARCHAEOLOGY; INDICATORS;
D O I
10.1108/00012531111135727
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to analyse the publications of, and the citations to, the current staff of 19 departments of computer science in Malaysian universities, and to compare these bibliometric data with expert peer reviews of Malaysian research performance. Design/methodology/approach - This paper searches citation of the Scopus and Web of Science databases. Findings - Both publication and citation rates are low, although this is at least in part due to some Malaysian universities having only a teaching function. More of the departments' publications were identified in Scopus than in Web of Science, but both databases were needed for comprehensive coverage. Statistically significant relationships were observed between the departments' publication and citation counts and the rankings of the departments' parent universities in two evaluations of the research performance of Malaysian universities. Originality/value - This is the first comparison of bibliometric and peer-review data for Malaysia, and, more generally, for a country with a newly developed higher education system.
引用
收藏
页码:321 / 335
页数:15
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Allocative efficiency in public research funding: Can bibliometrics help? [J].
Abramo, Giovanni ;
D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea ;
Caprasecca, Alessandro .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2009, 38 (01) :206-215
[2]   When different persons have an identical author name. How frequent are homonyms? [J].
Aksnes, Dag W. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 59 (05) :838-841
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, DEV BIBLIOMETRIC IND
[4]   Comparing of Science Bibliometric Statistics Obtained From the Web and Scopus [J].
Archambault, Eric ;
Campbell, David ;
Gingras, Yves ;
Lariviere, Vincent .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 60 (07) :1320-1326
[5]  
Arunachalam S., 2003, Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science, V29, P16, DOI 10.1002/bult.286
[6]  
Bakri A, 2009, MALAYS J LIBR INF SC, V14, P39
[7]   Which h-index? - A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar [J].
Bar-Ilan, Judit .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2008, 74 (02) :257-271
[8]   MAINSTREAM AND NON MAINSTREAM SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE IN 4 PERIPHERAL ASIAN SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITIES [J].
DAVIS, CH ;
EISEMON, TO .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 1989, 15 (3-4) :215-239
[9]   Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses [J].
Falagas, Matthew E. ;
Pitsouni, Eleni I. ;
Malietzis, George A. ;
Pappas, Georgios .
FASEB JOURNAL, 2008, 22 (02) :338-342
[10]   Web of Science and Scopus: a journal title overlap study [J].
Gavel, Ylva ;
Iselid, Lars .
ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW, 2008, 32 (01) :8-21