Off-grid solar photovoltaic systems for rural electrification and emissions mitigation in India

被引:63
作者
Sandwell, Philip [1 ,2 ]
Chan, Ngai Lam Alvin [1 ,2 ]
Foster, Samuel [1 ]
Nagpal, Divyam [1 ]
Emmott, Christopher J. M. [1 ,2 ]
Candelise, Chiara [3 ,4 ]
Buckle, Simon J. [2 ]
Ekins-Daukes, Ned [1 ,2 ]
Gambhir, Ajay [2 ]
Nelson, Jenny [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Dept Phys, Blackett Lab, Prince Consort Rd, London SW7 2AZ, England
[2] Imperial Coll London, Grantham Inst Climate Change & Environm, London SW7 2AZ, England
[3] Imperial Coll London, Ctr Energy Policy & Technol, London SW7 2AZ, England
[4] Bocconi Univ, IEFE, Via Roengten 1, I-20136 Milan, Italy
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Photovoltaics; Rural electrification; Greenhouse gas mitigation; Emissions intensity; Off grid system; Hybrid system; India; Organic photovoltaics; Concentrated photovoltaics; ENERGY PAYBACK TIME; TECHNOLOGIES; EXTENSION; PERFORMANCE; GENERATION; BATTERIES; AREAS; CELLS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.solmat.2016.04.030
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Over one billion people lack access to electricity and many of them in rural areas far from existing infrastructure. Off-grid systems can provide an alternative to extending the grid network and using renewable energy, for example solar photovoltaics (PV) and battery storage, can mitigate greenhouse gas emissions from electricity that would otherwise come from fossil fuel sources. This paper presents a model capable of comparing several mature and emerging PV technologies for rural electrification with diesel generation and grid extension for locations in India in terms of both the levelised cost and lifecycle emissions intensity of electricity. The levelised cost of used electricity, ranging from $0.46-1.20/kWh, and greenhouse gas emissions are highly dependent on the PV technology chosen, with battery storage contributing significantly to both metrics. The conditions under which PV and storage becomes more favourable than grid extension are calculated and hybrid systems of PV, storage and diesel generation are evaluated. Analysis of expected price evolutions suggest that the most cost-effective hybrid systems will be dominated by PV generation around 2018. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 156
页数:10
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   Decentralized energy systems for clean electricity access [J].
Alstone, Peter ;
Gershenson, Dimitry ;
Kammen, Daniel M. .
NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2015, 5 (04) :305-314
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, WORLD EN OUTL
[3]  
[Anonymous], FINANCIAL TIMES
[4]   Optimised model for community-based hybrid energy system [J].
Ashok, S. .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2007, 32 (07) :1155-1164
[5]   Technical and economic assessment of perovskite solar cells for large scale manufacturing [J].
Asif, Amir A. ;
Singh, Rajendra ;
Alapatt, Githin F. .
JOURNAL OF RENEWABLE AND SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2015, 7 (04)
[6]  
Assam G.O., 2006, RUR EL PLAN
[7]  
Authority C.E., 2013, CO2 BAS DAT IND POW
[8]  
Bank W., 2008, REN EN TOOLK RESTOOL
[9]   Energy payback time (EPBT) and energy return on energy invested (EROI) of solar photovoltaic systems: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Bhandari, Khagendra P. ;
Collier, Jennifer M. ;
Ellingson, Randy J. ;
Apul, Defne S. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 47 :133-141
[10]   Rural electrification through village grids-Assessing the cost competitiveness of isolated renewable energy technologies in Indonesia [J].
Blum, Nicola U. ;
Wakeling, Ratri Sryantoro ;
Schmidt, Tobias S. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 22 :482-496