共 8 条
How do independent directors view generalist vs. specialist CEOs? Evidence from an exogenous regulatory shock
被引:6
|作者:
Chatjuthamard, Pattanaporn
[1
,2
]
Jiraporn, Pornsit
[3
]
Treepongkaruna, Sirimon
[4
,5
]
机构:
[1] Chulalongkorn Univ, Sasin Sch Management, Bangkok, Thailand
[2] Chulalongkorn Univ, Sasin Sch Management, Ctr Excellence Management Res Corp Governance & B, 254 Phayathai Rd, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
[3] Penn State Univ, Sch Grad Profess Studies, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[4] Univ Western Australia, UWA Business Sch, 35 Stirling Hwy, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
[5] Chulalongkorn Univ, Sasin Sch Management, Res Unit Sustainabil Finance & Capital Market Dev, 254 Phayathai Rd, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
关键词:
Generalist CEOs;
Specialist CEOs;
Independent directors;
Board independence;
Corporate governance;
Sarbanes-Oxley;
SARBANES-OXLEY-ACT;
GOVERNANCE EVIDENCE;
COMPENSATION;
EXPERIENCE;
D O I:
10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101957
中图分类号:
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号:
0202 ;
摘要:
Exploiting the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act as a quasi-natural experiment, we explore how independent directors view generalist vs. specialist CEOs. Generalist CEOs possess the general managerial skills that can be applied across firms and industries. Our difference-in-difference estimates show that independent directors view generalist CEOs unfavorably. Firms forced to raise board independence experience a lower increase in CEO general ability than those not required to change board composition. Additional analysis confirms the results, including fixed- and random-effects regressions, propensity score matching, instrumental-variable analysis, and Oster's (2019) technique for testing coefficient stability.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文