Simultaneous detection and differentiates of Brucella abortus and Brucella melitensis by combinatorial PCR

被引:18
作者
Mirnejad, Reza [1 ]
Doust, Reza Hosseini [1 ]
Kachuei, Reza [1 ]
Mortazavi, Seied Mojtaba [2 ]
Khoobdel, Mehdi [3 ]
Ahamadi, Ali [1 ]
机构
[1] Baqiyatallah Univ Med Sci, Mol Biol Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[2] Kerman Univ Med Sci, Hlth Stn, Kerman, Iran
[3] Baqiyatallah Univ Med Sci, Hlth Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Brucella abortus; Brucella melitensis; Combinatorial PCR; SEROLOGICAL METHODS; CULTURE; ASSAY; DIAGNOSIS; GENUS;
D O I
10.1016/S1995-7645(11)60239-3
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate simultaneous detection and differentiates of Brucella abortus(B. abortus) and Brucella melitensis (B. melitensis) through the combinatorial PCR method. Methods: This study was designed using three primers that could simultaneously identify and differentiate two major species of pathogenic Brucella in humans and animals. Identification and differentiation of each species using the size of the PC R product were determined. To determine the specificity of the method, bacteria close to the genus Brucella were used. Finally, to confirm PCR products, In addition to the products sequence, RFLP was performed on PCR products using restriction enzymes. Results: The method of optimized combinatorial PCR in this study could simultaneously detect and differentiate B. abortus and B. melitensis with high specificity and sensitivity in clinical samples. Differentiation of species is based on the resulting bands. therefore, the band 494 bp for B. abortus and 733 bp for B. melitensis were obtained. RFLP and sequencing results confirmed PCR results. Conclustions: The results of this study shows that without routine diagnostie methods such as culture and serology tests, using the molecular method of combinatorial PCR, important species of Brucella can be simultaneously identified and differentiated in clinical samples.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 28
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Akhtardanesh B., 2011, Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Disease, V1, P177, DOI 10.1016/S2222-1808(11)60023-6
[2]  
Al Dahouk Sascha, 2003, Clin Lab, V49, P577
[3]  
Aliskan H, 2008, MIKROBIYOL BUL, V42, P185
[4]   Update on laboratory diagnosis of human brucellosis [J].
Araj, George F. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2010, 36 :S12-S17
[5]   Evaluation of the Brucella abortus species-specific polymerase chain reaction assay, an improved version of the Brucella AMOS polymerase chain reaction assay for cattle [J].
Bricker, BJ ;
Ewalt, DR ;
Olsen, SC ;
Jensen, AE .
JOURNAL OF VETERINARY DIAGNOSTIC INVESTIGATION, 2003, 15 (04) :374-378
[6]   PCR as a diagnostic tool for brucellosis [J].
Bricker, BJ .
VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2002, 90 (1-4) :435-446
[7]   Comparison of direct culture versus PCR for the detection of Brucella in aborted fetuses of cattle and sheep in Turkey [J].
Buyukcangaz, E. ;
Sen, A. ;
Carli, K. T. ;
Kahya, S. .
VETERINARY RECORD, 2011, 168 (16) :430
[8]  
Christopher Supriya, 2010, J Lab Physicians, V2, P55, DOI 10.4103/0974-2727.72149
[9]   Brucella taxonomy and evolution [J].
Ficht, Thomas .
FUTURE MICROBIOLOGY, 2010, 5 (06) :859-866
[10]   Human brucellosis [J].
Franco, Maria Pio ;
Mulder, Maximilian ;
Gilman, Robert H. ;
Smits, Henk L. .
LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2007, 7 (12) :775-786