Robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: technique and short-term outcome for 29 consecutive patients

被引:45
|
作者
Leong, Quor M. [1 ,2 ]
Son, Dong N. [1 ]
Cho, Jae S. [1 ]
Baek, Se J. [1 ]
Kwak, Jung M. [1 ]
Amar, Azali H. [1 ]
Kim, Seon H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Korea Univ, Coll Med, Anam Hosp, Seoul 136705, South Korea
[2] Tan Tock Seng Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Singapore 308433, Singapore
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2011年 / 25卷 / 09期
关键词
Cancer; Intersphincteric; Rectal; Robot; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; LAPAROSCOPIC RESECTION; ANTERIOR RESECTION; COLOANAL ANASTOMOSIS; ONCOLOGIC OUTCOMES; SURGERY; DISSECTION; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-011-1657-6
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Intersphincteric resection (ISR) for low rectal cancer has been described as the ultimate sphincter-saving procedure. Laparoscopic ISR has been proved safe with early postoperative benefits. Recently, some colorectal surgeons have begun to perform robot-assisted ISR to harness the advantages of the da Vinci robotic system. The authors present their short-term results for a robotic technique of ISR. Data from 29 consecutive patients at a single institution with very low rectal cancer (< 4 cm) from the anal verge who underwent robot-assisted ISR were prospectively collected between December 2007 and March 2010. The study enrolled 23 men and 6 women with a median age of 61.5 years (range, 36-82 years). Their median body mass index (BMI) was 23.3 kg/m(2) (range, 17.9-32.5 kg/m(2)). The median distance of the tumor from the anal verge was 3 cm (range, 1-4 cm). The median operative time was 325 min (range, 235-435 min), with a console time of 130 min (range, 110-210 min). There were no conversions to open surgery. A protecting ileostomy was performed for all the patients. The median blood loss was less than 50 ml (range, < 50-1,000 ml). The median size of the tumor was 3 cm (range, 0-6.9 cm), and the median number of lymph nodes harvested was 16 (range, 1-44). The median distal margin was 0.8 cm (range, 0-4 cm), and one margin was positive. The circumferential margin was negative (> 2 mm) for 27 patients. Therefore, complete resection (R0) was achieved for 26 (90%) of the 29 patients. The median hospital stay was 9 days (range, 5-15 days). Nine patients experienced complications, including three anastomotic leaks (10%). All the leaks were managed conservatively. No surgical mortalities occurred. Robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer is feasible, and its short-term outcome is acceptable.
引用
收藏
页码:2987 / 2992
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Quality of life of patients after low anterior, intersphincteric, and abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer-a matched-pair analysis
    Konanz, Julia
    Herrle, Florian
    Weiss, Christel
    Post, Stefan
    Kienle, Peter
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2013, 28 (05) : 679 - 688
  • [42] Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection of Rectal Cancer: Short-Term Outcome of a Prospective Comparative Study
    Seung Hyuk Baik
    Hye Youn Kwon
    Jin Soo Kim
    Hyuk Hur
    Seung Kook Sohn
    Chang Hwan Cho
    Hoguen Kim
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2009, 16 : 1480 - 1487
  • [43] Short-term Outcome of Robot-assisted and Open IPAA: An Observational Single-center Study
    Mark-Christensen, Anders
    Pachler, Frederik Ronne
    Norager, Charlotte Buchard
    Jepsen, Peter
    Laurberg, Soren
    Tottrup, Anders
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2016, 59 (03) : 201 - 207
  • [44] Impact of obesity on short-term results of laparoscopic rectal cancer resection
    Bege, Thierry
    Lelong, Bernard
    Francon, Daniel
    Turrini, Olivier
    Guiramand, Jerome
    Delpero, Jean-Robert
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2009, 23 (07): : 1460 - 1464
  • [45] Long-term results of extended intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer: a retrospective study
    Kim, Hyun Sung
    Ko, Sanghwa
    Oh, Nahm-gun
    BMC SURGERY, 2016, 16
  • [46] Laparoscopic Versus Open Intersphincteric Resection and Coloanal Anastomosis for Low Rectal Cancer Intermediate-Term Oncologic Outcomes
    Park, Jun Seok
    Choi, Gyu-Seog
    Jun, Soo Han
    Hasegawa, Suguru
    Sakai, Yoshiharu
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2011, 254 (06) : 941 - 946
  • [47] Intersphincteric resection in patients with very low rectal cancer: A review of the Japanese experience
    Saito, Norio
    Moriya, Yoshihiro
    Shirouzu, Kazuo
    Maeda, Koutarou
    Mochizuki, Hidetaka
    Koda, Keiji
    Hirai, Takashi
    Sugito, Masanori
    Ito, Masaaki
    Kobayashi, Akihiro
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2006, 49 (10) : S13 - S22
  • [48] Feasibility of robot-assisted surgery in elderly patients with rectal cancer
    Su, Wei-Chih
    Huang, Ching-Wen
    Ma, Cheng-Jen
    Chen, Po-Jung
    Tsai, Hsiang-Lin
    Chang, Tsung-Kun
    Chen, Yen-Cheng
    Li, Ching-Chun
    Yeh, Yung-Sung
    Wang, Jaw-Yuan
    JOURNAL OF MINIMAL ACCESS SURGERY, 2021, 17 (02) : 165 - 174
  • [49] Short-term outcomes of the modified extralevator abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer (with videos)
    Eun Jung Park
    Seung Hyuk Baik
    Jeonghyun Kang
    Hyuk Hur
    Byung Soh Min
    Kang Young Lee
    Nam Kyu Kim
    Seung-Kook Sohn
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2016, 30 : 1672 - 1682