Robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: technique and short-term outcome for 29 consecutive patients

被引:45
|
作者
Leong, Quor M. [1 ,2 ]
Son, Dong N. [1 ]
Cho, Jae S. [1 ]
Baek, Se J. [1 ]
Kwak, Jung M. [1 ]
Amar, Azali H. [1 ]
Kim, Seon H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Korea Univ, Coll Med, Anam Hosp, Seoul 136705, South Korea
[2] Tan Tock Seng Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Singapore 308433, Singapore
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2011年 / 25卷 / 09期
关键词
Cancer; Intersphincteric; Rectal; Robot; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; LAPAROSCOPIC RESECTION; ANTERIOR RESECTION; COLOANAL ANASTOMOSIS; ONCOLOGIC OUTCOMES; SURGERY; DISSECTION; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-011-1657-6
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Intersphincteric resection (ISR) for low rectal cancer has been described as the ultimate sphincter-saving procedure. Laparoscopic ISR has been proved safe with early postoperative benefits. Recently, some colorectal surgeons have begun to perform robot-assisted ISR to harness the advantages of the da Vinci robotic system. The authors present their short-term results for a robotic technique of ISR. Data from 29 consecutive patients at a single institution with very low rectal cancer (< 4 cm) from the anal verge who underwent robot-assisted ISR were prospectively collected between December 2007 and March 2010. The study enrolled 23 men and 6 women with a median age of 61.5 years (range, 36-82 years). Their median body mass index (BMI) was 23.3 kg/m(2) (range, 17.9-32.5 kg/m(2)). The median distance of the tumor from the anal verge was 3 cm (range, 1-4 cm). The median operative time was 325 min (range, 235-435 min), with a console time of 130 min (range, 110-210 min). There were no conversions to open surgery. A protecting ileostomy was performed for all the patients. The median blood loss was less than 50 ml (range, < 50-1,000 ml). The median size of the tumor was 3 cm (range, 0-6.9 cm), and the median number of lymph nodes harvested was 16 (range, 1-44). The median distal margin was 0.8 cm (range, 0-4 cm), and one margin was positive. The circumferential margin was negative (> 2 mm) for 27 patients. Therefore, complete resection (R0) was achieved for 26 (90%) of the 29 patients. The median hospital stay was 9 days (range, 5-15 days). Nine patients experienced complications, including three anastomotic leaks (10%). All the leaks were managed conservatively. No surgical mortalities occurred. Robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer is feasible, and its short-term outcome is acceptable.
引用
收藏
页码:2987 / 2992
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Laparoscopic Transabdominal Approach Partial Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: Surgical Feasibility and Intermediate-Term Outcome
    Pan Chi
    Sheng-Hui Huang
    Hui-Ming Lin
    Xing-Rong Lu
    Ying Huang
    Wei-Zhong Jiang
    Zong-Bin Xu
    Zhi-Fen Chen
    Yan-Wu Sun
    Dao-Xiong Ye
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2015, 22 : 944 - 951
  • [32] Laparoscopic Transabdominal Approach Partial Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: Surgical Feasibility and Intermediate-Term Outcome
    Chi, Pan
    Huang, Sheng-Hui
    Lin, Hui-Ming
    Lu, Xing-Rong
    Huang, Ying
    Jiang, Wei-Zhong
    Xu, Zong-Bin
    Chen, Zhi-Fen
    Sun, Yan-Wu
    Ye, Dao-Xiong
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 22 (03) : 944 - 951
  • [33] Implementation of a standardized surgical technique in robot-assisted restorative rectal cancer resection: a single center cohort study
    Jacob Damgaard Eriksen
    Henriette Vind Thaysen
    Katrine Jøssing Emmertsen
    Anders Husted Madsen
    Anders Tøttrup
    Charlotte Buchard Nørager
    Ken Ljungmann
    Niels Thomassen
    Conor Patrick Delaney
    Lene Hjerrild Iversen
    BMC Surgery, 22
  • [34] Robotic-assisted multivisceral resection for rectal cancer: short-term outcomes at a single center
    Hino, H.
    Yamaguchi, T.
    Kinugasa, Y.
    Shiomi, A.
    Kagawa, H.
    Yamakawa, Y.
    Numata, M.
    Furutani, A.
    Yamaoka, Y.
    Manabe, S.
    Suzuki, T.
    Kato, S.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2017, 21 (11) : 879 - 886
  • [35] Laparoscopic Rectal Resection for Cancer: Effects of Conversion on Short-Term Outcome and Survival
    Matteo Rottoli
    Stefano Bona
    Riccardo Rosati
    Ugo Elmore
    Paolo P. Bianchi
    Antonino Spinelli
    Cristina Bartolucci
    Marco Montorsi
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2009, 16
  • [36] Implementation of a standardized surgical technique in robot-assisted restorative rectal cancer resection: a single center cohort study
    Eriksen, Jacob Damgaard
    Thaysen, Henriette Vind
    Emmertsen, Katrine Jossing
    Madsen, Anders Husted
    Tottrup, Anders
    Norager, Charlotte Buchard
    Ljungmann, Ken
    Thomassen, Niels
    Delaney, Conor Patrick
    Iversen, Lene Hjerrild
    BMC SURGERY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [37] Long term outcome of anastomotic leakage in patients undergoing low anterior resection for rectal cancer
    Artus, Alice
    Tabchouri, Nicolas
    Iskander, Othman
    Michot, Nicolas
    Muller, Olivier
    Giger-Pabst, Urs
    Bourlier, Pascal
    Bourbao-Tournois, Celine
    Kraemer-Bucur, Aurore
    Lecomte, Thierry
    Salame, Ephrem
    Ouaissi, Mehdi
    BMC CANCER, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [38] Laparoscopic Rectal Resection for Cancer: Effects of Conversion on Short-Term Outcome and Survival
    Rottoli, Matteo
    Bona, Stefano
    Rosati, Riccardo
    Elmore, Ugo
    Bianchi, Paolo P.
    Spinelli, Antonino
    Bartolucci, Cristina
    Montorsi, Marco
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 16 (05) : 1279 - 1286
  • [39] Robot-assisted low anterior resection in fifty-three consecutive patients: An Indian experience
    Kenawadekar R.D.
    Dhange R.Z.
    Pandit A.
    Bandawar M.S.
    Joshi S.
    Agarwal G.
    Jagtap A.P.
    Puntambekar S.
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2013, 7 (4) : 311 - 316
  • [40] Long-term Outcomes after Intersphincteric Resection for Low-Lying Rectal Cancer
    Saito, Norio
    Ito, Masaaki
    Kobayashi, Akihiro
    Nishizawa, Yusuke
    Kojima, Motohiro
    Nishizawa, Yuji
    Sugito, Masanori
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 21 (11) : 3608 - 3615