Robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: technique and short-term outcome for 29 consecutive patients

被引:45
|
作者
Leong, Quor M. [1 ,2 ]
Son, Dong N. [1 ]
Cho, Jae S. [1 ]
Baek, Se J. [1 ]
Kwak, Jung M. [1 ]
Amar, Azali H. [1 ]
Kim, Seon H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Korea Univ, Coll Med, Anam Hosp, Seoul 136705, South Korea
[2] Tan Tock Seng Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Singapore 308433, Singapore
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2011年 / 25卷 / 09期
关键词
Cancer; Intersphincteric; Rectal; Robot; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; LAPAROSCOPIC RESECTION; ANTERIOR RESECTION; COLOANAL ANASTOMOSIS; ONCOLOGIC OUTCOMES; SURGERY; DISSECTION; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-011-1657-6
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Intersphincteric resection (ISR) for low rectal cancer has been described as the ultimate sphincter-saving procedure. Laparoscopic ISR has been proved safe with early postoperative benefits. Recently, some colorectal surgeons have begun to perform robot-assisted ISR to harness the advantages of the da Vinci robotic system. The authors present their short-term results for a robotic technique of ISR. Data from 29 consecutive patients at a single institution with very low rectal cancer (< 4 cm) from the anal verge who underwent robot-assisted ISR were prospectively collected between December 2007 and March 2010. The study enrolled 23 men and 6 women with a median age of 61.5 years (range, 36-82 years). Their median body mass index (BMI) was 23.3 kg/m(2) (range, 17.9-32.5 kg/m(2)). The median distance of the tumor from the anal verge was 3 cm (range, 1-4 cm). The median operative time was 325 min (range, 235-435 min), with a console time of 130 min (range, 110-210 min). There were no conversions to open surgery. A protecting ileostomy was performed for all the patients. The median blood loss was less than 50 ml (range, < 50-1,000 ml). The median size of the tumor was 3 cm (range, 0-6.9 cm), and the median number of lymph nodes harvested was 16 (range, 1-44). The median distal margin was 0.8 cm (range, 0-4 cm), and one margin was positive. The circumferential margin was negative (> 2 mm) for 27 patients. Therefore, complete resection (R0) was achieved for 26 (90%) of the 29 patients. The median hospital stay was 9 days (range, 5-15 days). Nine patients experienced complications, including three anastomotic leaks (10%). All the leaks were managed conservatively. No surgical mortalities occurred. Robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer is feasible, and its short-term outcome is acceptable.
引用
收藏
页码:2987 / 2992
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer in Japan
    Yamada, Kazutaka
    Saiki, Yasumitsu
    Takano, Shota
    Iwamoto, Kazutsugu
    Tanaka, Masafumi
    Fukunaga, Mitsuko
    Noguchi, Tadaaki
    Nakamura, Yasushi
    Hisano, Saburo
    Fukami, Kensaku
    Kuwahara, Daisaku
    Tsuji, Yoriyuki
    Takano, Masahiro
    Usuku, Koichiro
    Ikeda, Tokunori
    Sugihara, Kenichi
    SURGERY TODAY, 2019, 49 (04) : 275 - 285
  • [22] Short-term clinical effects of robot-assisted esophagectomy with thoracic duct resection
    Li, Chunguang
    Li, Bin
    Yang, Yang
    Li, Zhigang
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 14 (01) : 11 - 21
  • [23] Simple pelvimetry predicts the pelvic manipulation time in robot-assisted low and ultra-low anterior resection for rectal cancer
    Fujimoto, Takaaki
    Tamura, Koji
    Nagayoshi, Kinuko
    Mizuuchi, Yusuke
    Goto, Fumika
    Matsuda, Hironao
    Horioka, Kohei
    Shindo, Koji
    Nakata, Kohei
    Ohuchida, Kenoki
    Nakamura, Masafumi
    SURGERY TODAY, 2024, 54 (10) : 1184 - 1192
  • [24] Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection of Rectal Cancer: Short-Term Outcome of a Prospective Comparative Study
    Baik, Seung Hyuk
    Kwon, Hye Youn
    Kim, Jin Soo
    Hur, Hyuk
    Sohn, Seung Kook
    Cho, Chang Hwan
    Kim, Hoguen
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 16 (06) : 1480 - 1487
  • [25] Outcome one year after robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery: a consecutive cohort study
    Harslof, Sanne
    Stouge, Anders
    Thomassen, Niels
    Ravn, Sissel
    Laurberg, Soren
    Iversen, Lene Hjerrild
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2017, 32 (12) : 1749 - 1758
  • [26] Comparing short-term outcomes of robot-assisted and conventional laparoscopic total mesorectal excision surgery for rectal cancer in elderly patients
    Yang, Hao
    Yang, Gang
    Wu, Wen-Ya
    Wang, Fang
    Yao, Xue-Quan
    Wu, Xiao-Yu
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2024, 16 (05):
  • [27] Short-term and long-term efficacy in robot-assisted treatment for mid and low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wu, Huiming
    Guo, Renkai
    Li, Huiyu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2023, 39 (01)
  • [28] Oncological and anorectal functional outcomes of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection in lower rectal cancer, particularly the extent of sphincter resection and sphincter saving
    Kim, Jin Cheon
    Lee, Jong Lyul
    Bong, Joon Woo
    Seo, Ji Hyun
    Kim, Chan Wook
    Park, Seong Ho
    Kim, Jihoon
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (05): : 2082 - 2094
  • [29] Clinical outcomes of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: comparison with conventional laparoscopy and multifactorial analysis of the learning curve for robotic surgery
    Kuo, Li-Jen
    Lin, Yen-Kuang
    Chang, Chun-Chao
    Tai, Cheng-Jeng
    Chiou, Jeng-Fong
    Chang, Yu-Jia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2014, 29 (05) : 555 - 562
  • [30] Single-Stage Totally Robotic Dissection for Rectal Cancer Surgery: Technique and Short-Term Outcome in 50 Consecutive Patients
    Choi, Dong Jin
    Kim, Seon Hahn
    Lee, Peter J. M.
    Kim, Jin
    Woo, Si Uk
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2009, 52 (11) : 1824 - 1830