Robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: technique and short-term outcome for 29 consecutive patients

被引:45
|
作者
Leong, Quor M. [1 ,2 ]
Son, Dong N. [1 ]
Cho, Jae S. [1 ]
Baek, Se J. [1 ]
Kwak, Jung M. [1 ]
Amar, Azali H. [1 ]
Kim, Seon H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Korea Univ, Coll Med, Anam Hosp, Seoul 136705, South Korea
[2] Tan Tock Seng Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Singapore 308433, Singapore
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2011年 / 25卷 / 09期
关键词
Cancer; Intersphincteric; Rectal; Robot; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; LAPAROSCOPIC RESECTION; ANTERIOR RESECTION; COLOANAL ANASTOMOSIS; ONCOLOGIC OUTCOMES; SURGERY; DISSECTION; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-011-1657-6
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Intersphincteric resection (ISR) for low rectal cancer has been described as the ultimate sphincter-saving procedure. Laparoscopic ISR has been proved safe with early postoperative benefits. Recently, some colorectal surgeons have begun to perform robot-assisted ISR to harness the advantages of the da Vinci robotic system. The authors present their short-term results for a robotic technique of ISR. Data from 29 consecutive patients at a single institution with very low rectal cancer (< 4 cm) from the anal verge who underwent robot-assisted ISR were prospectively collected between December 2007 and March 2010. The study enrolled 23 men and 6 women with a median age of 61.5 years (range, 36-82 years). Their median body mass index (BMI) was 23.3 kg/m(2) (range, 17.9-32.5 kg/m(2)). The median distance of the tumor from the anal verge was 3 cm (range, 1-4 cm). The median operative time was 325 min (range, 235-435 min), with a console time of 130 min (range, 110-210 min). There were no conversions to open surgery. A protecting ileostomy was performed for all the patients. The median blood loss was less than 50 ml (range, < 50-1,000 ml). The median size of the tumor was 3 cm (range, 0-6.9 cm), and the median number of lymph nodes harvested was 16 (range, 1-44). The median distal margin was 0.8 cm (range, 0-4 cm), and one margin was positive. The circumferential margin was negative (> 2 mm) for 27 patients. Therefore, complete resection (R0) was achieved for 26 (90%) of the 29 patients. The median hospital stay was 9 days (range, 5-15 days). Nine patients experienced complications, including three anastomotic leaks (10%). All the leaks were managed conservatively. No surgical mortalities occurred. Robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer is feasible, and its short-term outcome is acceptable.
引用
收藏
页码:2987 / 2992
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: technique and short-term outcome for 29 consecutive patients
    Quor M. Leong
    Dong N. Son
    Jae S. Cho
    Se J. Baek
    Jung M. Kwak
    Azali H. Amar
    Seon H. Kim
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2011, 25 : 2987 - 2992
  • [2] Short-term clinical outcome of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a retrospective comparison with conventional laparoscopy
    Park, Soo Yeun
    Choi, Gyu-Seog
    Park, Jun Seok
    Kim, Hye Jin
    Ryuk, Jong-Pil
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 27 (01): : 48 - 55
  • [3] Robot-assisted intersphincteric resection facilitates an efficient sphincter-saving in patients with low rectal cancer
    Kim, Jin Cheon
    Lee, Jong Lyul
    Alotaibi, Abdulrahman Muaod
    Yoon, Yong Sik
    Kim, Chan Wook
    Park, In Ja
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2017, 32 (08) : 1137 - 1145
  • [4] Robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for rectal submucosal tumour
    Du, Jin-Lin
    Chen, Chia-Che
    Chao, Hsiao-Mei
    Kuo, Li-Jen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2016, 12 (03) : 478 - 482
  • [5] Robot-assisted intersphincteric resection facilitates an efficient sphincter-saving in patients with low rectal cancer
    Jin Cheon Kim
    Jong Lyul Lee
    Abdulrahman Muaod Alotaibi
    Yong Sik Yoon
    Chan Wook Kim
    In Ja Park
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2017, 32 : 1137 - 1145
  • [6] Short-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Intersphincteric Resection for Lower Rectal Cancer and Comparison with Open Approach
    Yamamoto, Seiichiro
    Fujita, Shin
    Akasu, Takayuki
    Inada, Ryo
    Takawa, Masashi
    Moriya, Yoshihiro
    DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 28 (5-6) : 404 - 409
  • [7] Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for patients with low rectal cancer: Short-term outcomes
    Ge, Wei
    Shao, Li-Hua
    Qiu, Yu-Dong
    Chen, Gang
    JOURNAL OF MINIMAL ACCESS SURGERY, 2025, 21 (01) : 60 - 65
  • [8] Short- and Medium-Term Outcome of Robot-Assisted and Traditional Laparoscopic Rectal Resection
    Patriti, Alberto
    Ceccarelli, Graziano
    Bartoli, Alberto
    Spaziani, Alessandro
    Biancafarina, Alessia
    Casciola, Luciano
    JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2009, 13 (02) : 176 - 183
  • [9] Oncologic Outcome of Intersphincteric Resection for Very Low Rectal Cancer
    Saito, Norio
    Sugito, Masanori
    Ito, Masaaki
    Kobayashi, Akihiro
    Nishizawa, Yusuke
    Yoneyama, Yasuo
    Nishizawa, Yuji
    Minagawa, Nozomi
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 33 (08) : 1750 - 1756
  • [10] Robot-assisted laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer
    Alimoglu, O.
    Atak, I.
    Kilic, A.
    Caliskan, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2012, 8 (03) : 371 - 374