Intolerance and political repression in the United States: A half century after McCarthyism

被引:46
作者
Gibson, James L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Weidenbaum Ctr Econ Govt & Publ Policy, Program Citizenship & Democrat Values, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00301.x
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
What consequences for political fireedom arise from high levels of political intolerance among the American public? Comparing surveys from 1954 to 2005, 1 document the level of perceived freedom today and consider how it has changed since the McCarthy era. Levels of intolerance today and in 1954 are also compared. Next assessed is whether restrictions on freedom are uniformly perceived or whether some subsections of the population are more likely to feel repressed than others. I find that while intolerance may have declined somewhat since 1954, perceived constraints on individual freedom have actually increased. These findings produce telling consequences for the subtheory of pluralistic intolerance. During McCarthyism, intolerance focused on the Left; today, many groups are not tolerated, so the loss of freedom is more widespread. Heretofore, many thought that pluralistic intolerance tended to be benign. At least in the case of the contemporary United States, it seems not to be.
引用
收藏
页码:96 / 108
页数:13
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, PERILOUS TIMES FREE
[2]  
Bachrach Peter, 1967, THEORY DEMOCRATIC EL
[3]  
Baker Stewart A., 2005, PATRIOT DEBATES EXPE
[4]  
BROWN R, 1958, LOYALTY SECURITY
[5]  
Dahl Robert A., 1971, POLYARCHY
[6]  
Davis Darren W., 2007, NEGATIVE LIBERTY PUB
[7]   Civil liberties vs. security: Public opinion in the context of the terrorist attacks on America [J].
Davis, DW ;
Silver, BD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2004, 48 (01) :28-46
[8]  
de Tocqueville A., 1948, Democracy in America
[9]  
Gibson J.L., 2007, OXFORD HDB POLITICAL, P323
[10]  
Gibson JamesL., 2003, Overcoming Intolerance in South Africa: Experiments in Democratic Persuasion