Formula choice: Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, or SRK/T and refractive outcomes in 8108 eyes after cataract surgery with biometry by partial coherence interferometry

被引:250
作者
Aristodemou, Petros [1 ,2 ]
Cartwright, Nathaniel E. Knox [1 ]
Sparrow, John M. [1 ,3 ]
Johnston, Robert L. [4 ]
机构
[1] Bristol Eye Hosp, Bristol BS1 2LX, Avon, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Acad Unit Ophthalmol, London, England
[3] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Int Ctr Eye Hlth, London WC1, England
[4] Gloucestershire Hosp Natl Hlth Serv Fdn Trust, Cheltenham Gen Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Cheltenham, Glos, England
关键词
INTRAOCULAR-LENS POWER; PREDICTION; IOLMASTER; ACCURACY; AUDIT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.07.032
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To assess how intraocular lens (IOL) formula choice affects refractive outcomes after cataract surgery using IOLMaster biometry. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cheltenham, United Kingdom. DESIGN: Database study. METHODS: Hypothetical prediction errors were retrospectively calculated on prospectively collected data from electronic medical records using optimized Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, and SRK/T formulas (Sofport AO and Akreos Fit IOLs) across a range of 0.5 mm or 1.0 mm axial length (AL) subgroups. RESULTS: In short eyes, the Hoffer Q had the lowest mean absolute error (MAE) for ALs from 20.00 to 20.99 mm. The Hoffer Q and Holladay 1 had a lower MAE than the SRK/T for ALs from 21.00 to 21.49 mm. There were no statistically significant differences in MAE for ALs from 21.50 to 21.99 mm. In medium eyes, there were no statistically significant differences in MAE for any IOL formula for ALs from 22.00 to 23.49 mm. For ALs from 23.50 to 25.99 mm, there was a trend toward lower MAEs for the Holladay 1, with statistically significant differences in 2 subgroups. In long eyes, the SRK/T had the lowest MAE, with statistically significant differences for ALs of 27.00 mm or longer. CONCLUSIONS: The Hoffer Q performed best for ALs from 20.00 to 20.99 mm, the Hoffer Q and Holladay 1 for ALs from 21.00 to 21.49 mm, and the SRK/T for ALs of 27.00 mm or longer. Using optimized constants, refractive outcomes of 40%, 75%, and 95% within +/- 0.25 diopter (D), +/- 0.50 D, and +/- 1.00 D, respectively, were achievable. Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned. Additional disclosure is found in the footnotes.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 71
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
A. Medisoft Ophthalmology, PAT NOT AUD ADM
[2]   Refractive and visual results after implantation of the AcrySof ReSTOR IOL in high and low hyperopic eyes [J].
Alfonso, Jose F. ;
Fernandez-Vega, Luis ;
Orti, Susana ;
Ferrer-Blasco, Teresa ;
Montes-Mico, Robert .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2009, 19 (05) :748-753
[3]   Intraocular lens formula constant optimization and partial coherence interferometry biometry: Refractive outcomes in 8108 eyes after cataract surgery [J].
Aristodemou, Petros ;
Cartwright, Nathaniel E. Knox ;
Sparrow, John M. ;
Johnston, Robert L. .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 37 (01) :50-62
[4]  
Aristodemou P, 2010, CLIN EXP OPHTHALMOL, V38, P236
[5]   The Cataract National Dataset electronic multicentre audit of 55 567 operations: when should IOLMaster biometric measurements be rechecked? [J].
Cartwright, N. E. Knox ;
Johnston, R. L. ;
Jaycock, P. D. ;
Tole, D. M. ;
Sparrow, J. M. .
EYE, 2010, 24 (05) :894-900
[6]  
Fedorov SN, 1967, VESTN OFTALMOL, V80, P27
[7]   National biometry audit II [J].
Gale, RP ;
Saha, N ;
Johnston, RL .
EYE, 2006, 20 (01) :25-28
[8]   Intraocular lens power calculation in short eyes [J].
Gavin, E. A. ;
Hammond, C. J. .
EYE, 2008, 22 (07) :935-938
[9]   Intraocular lens calculation in extreme myopia [J].
Haigis, Wolfgang .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2009, 35 (05) :906-911
[10]   Matrix-optical Representation of Currently Used Intraocular Lens Power Formulas [J].
Haigis, Wolfgang .
JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2009, 25 (02) :229-234