Examining the relations of time management and procrastination within a model of self-regulated learning

被引:100
作者
Wolters, Christopher A. [1 ]
Won, Sungjun [1 ]
Hussain, Maryam [2 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Educ Studies, Dennis Learning Ctr, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Univ Delaware, Newark, DE 19716 USA
关键词
Self-regulation; Procrastination; Motivation; Time management; College; ACADEMIC PROCRASTINATION; COLLEGE; PERFORMANCE; EFFICACY; ACHIEVEMENT; ATTITUDES; VALIDITY; BEHAVIOR; ABILITY; THINGS;
D O I
10.1007/s11409-017-9174-1
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The primary goal of this study was to investigate whether college students' academic time management could be used to understand their engagement in traditional and active forms of procrastination within a model of self-regulated learning. College students (N = 446) completed a self-report survey that assessed motivational and strategic aspects of self-regulated learning, time management, and procrastination. Results of regression analyses indicated that self-efficacy and metacognitive strategies initially were significant predictors of traditional and active forms of procrastination. Incorporating time management in the analyses increased the amount of the variance explained and, even in the presence of the motivation and strategy variables, time management emerged as an important predictor of both traditional and active forms of procrastination. Findings support the conclusion that academic time management is a key aspect of self-regulated learning and, as such, it can be useful for understanding the extent to which college students procrastinate when doing their academic work.
引用
收藏
页码:381 / 399
页数:19
相关论文
共 67 条
[41]   TIME MANAGEMENT - TEST OF A PROCESS MODEL [J].
MACAN, TH .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 79 (03) :381-391
[42]   Will you remember to read this article later when you have time? The relationship between prospective memory and time management [J].
Macan, Therese ;
Gibson, Janet M. ;
Cunningham, Jennifer .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2010, 48 (06) :725-730
[43]  
Meece J.L., 2008, Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications, P339
[44]  
Park S.W., 2012, PSYCHOLOGY, V3, P12, DOI [DOI 10.4236/PSYCH.2012.31003, 10.4236/psych.2012.31003]
[45]  
Pintrich PR, 2007, SCHOLARSHIP OF TEACHING AND LEARNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION: AN EVIDENCE-BASED PERSPECTIVE, P731, DOI 10.1007/1-4020-5742-3_16
[46]   RELIABILITY AND PREDICTIVE-VALIDITY OF THE MOTIVATED STRATEGIES FOR LEARNING QUESTIONNAIRE (MSLQ) [J].
PINTRICH, PR ;
SMITH, DAF ;
GARCIA, T ;
MCKEACHIE, WJ .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1993, 53 (03) :801-813
[47]  
Pressley M., 2006, HDB ED PSYCHOL, P265
[48]  
Pychyl TA, 2000, J SOC BEHAV PERS, V15, P239
[49]   Do psychosocial and study skill, factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis [J].
Robbins, SB ;
Lauver, K ;
Le, H ;
Davis, D ;
Langley, R ;
Carlstrom, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2004, 130 (02) :261-288
[50]   Development of Rationale and Measures of Noncognitive College Student Potential [J].
Schmitt, Neal .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 2012, 47 (01) :18-29