Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Bulky Stage IB2 Cervical Cancer Patients: A Single Institution's Experience over 14 Years

被引:15
作者
Kim, Woo Young [1 ]
Chang, Suk-Joon [1 ]
Chang, Ki-Hong [1 ]
Yoo, Seung-Chul [1 ]
Chun, Mison [2 ]
Ryu, Hee-Sug [1 ]
机构
[1] Ajou Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Suwon 443721, South Korea
[2] Ajou Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Suwon 443721, South Korea
关键词
IB2 cervical cancer; Treatment options; Ovarian preservation; Surgical approach; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; ADJUVANT RADIOTHERAPY; RADIATION-THERAPY; PELVIC RADIATION; CARCINOMA; CHEMOTHERAPY; MANAGEMENT; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1159/000320722
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Aim: The aim of this study was to assess various treatment options in stage IB2 cervical cancer patients. Methods: Between January 1995 and May 2007, 63 patients with stage IB2 were treated by radical hysterectomy (n = 28), primary concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT, n = 16) or radiation therapy (RT, n = 19). Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between these treatment modalities. Results: The 3-year DFS of the surgical approach group was 67.5% compared to 70.3% of the primary RT/CCRT group (p = 0.603). The 5-year OS of all patients was 75.9%. The 5-year OS of the surgical approach group was 81.6% compared to 76.2% of the primary RT/CCRT group (p = 0.578). Twelve (42.8%) of 28 surgically treated patients had high-risk pathologic factors. Out of 20 premenopausal patients who underwent the surgical approach, ovarian preservation was possible in 13 patients without adjuvant CCRT. Of these 13 patients, 7 patients did not experience disease recurrence and continued normal ovarian function. Conclusion: Both radical hysterectomy and primary RT/CCRT are effective treatment options in IB2 cervical cancer. In addition, the surgical approach can be considered for preserving ovarian function in premenopausal IB2 cervical cancer patients. Copyright (C) 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 23
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION AFTER THERAPY FOR CERVICAL CARCINOMA [J].
ABITBOL, MM ;
DAVENPORT, JH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1974, 119 (02) :181-189
[2]   Prognostic factors in FIGO stage IB cervical cancer without lymph node metastasis and the role of adjuvant radiotherapy after radical hysterectomy [J].
Ayhan, A ;
Al, RA ;
Baykal, C ;
Demirtas, E ;
Ayhan, A ;
Yüce, K .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2004, 14 (02) :286-292
[3]  
Benedet JL, 2001, J EPIDEMIOL BIOSTAT, V6, P5
[4]   Radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 vs IB2 carcinoma of the cervix: Does the new staging system predict morbidity and survival? [J].
Finan, MA ;
DeCesare, S ;
Fiorica, JV ;
Chambers, R ;
Hoffman, MS ;
Kline, RC ;
Roberts, WS ;
Cavanagh, D .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1996, 62 (02) :139-147
[5]   CLINICAL AND OPERATIVE STAGING OF CERVICAL-CANCER [J].
HACKER, NF .
BAILLIERES CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1988, 2 (04) :747-759
[6]  
HOPKINS MP, 1991, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V68, P272, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19910715)68:2<272::AID-CNCR2820680210>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-X
[8]   Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib-IIa cervical cancer [J].
Landoni, F ;
Maneo, A ;
Colombo, A ;
Placa, F ;
Milani, R ;
Perego, P ;
Favini, G ;
Ferri, L ;
Mangioni, C .
LANCET, 1997, 350 (9077) :535-540
[9]   Management of early-stage cervical carcinoma by modified (Type II) radical hysterectomy [J].
Michalas, S ;
Rodolakis, A ;
Voulgaris, Z ;
Vlachos, G ;
Giannakoulis, N ;
Diakomanolis, E .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2002, 85 (03) :415-422
[10]   Pelvic radiation with concurrent chemotherapy compared with pelvic and para-aortic radiation for high-risk cervical cancer [J].
Morris, M ;
Eifel, PJ ;
Lu, JD ;
Grigsby, PW ;
Levenback, C ;
Stevens, RE ;
Rotman, M ;
Gershenson, DM ;
Mutch, DG .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 340 (15) :1137-1143