Cost-effectiveness analysis of olanzapine-containing antiemetic therapy for managing highly emetogenic chemotherapy in Southeast Asia: a multinational study

被引:21
作者
Chanthawong, Suthan [1 ]
Lim, Yi Heng [2 ]
Subongkot, Suphat [1 ]
Chan, Alexandre [3 ,4 ]
Andalusia, Rizka [5 ]
Bustamam, Ros Suzanna Ahmad [6 ]
Chaiyakunapruk, Nathorn [2 ,7 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Khan Kacn Univ, Fac Pharmaceut Sci, Div Clin Pharm, Khon Kaen, Thailand
[2] Monash Univ Malaysia, Sch Pharm, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, Fac Sci, Dept Pharm, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Natl Canc Ctr Singapore, Dept Pharm, Singapore, Singapore
[5] Dharmais Canc Hosp, Dept Res & Dev, Jakarta, Indonesia
[6] Hosp Kuala Lumpur, Dept Radiotherapy & Oncol, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
[7] Naresuan Univ, Fac Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Pharm Practice, CPOR, Phitsanulok, Thailand
[8] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Pharm, 425 N Charter St, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[9] Monash Univ Malaysia, Global Asia 21st Century GA21 Platform, Hlth & Wellbeing Cluster, Asian Ctr Evidence Synth Populat Implementat & Cl, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
关键词
Olanzapine; Cost-effectiveness analysis; Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting; CINV; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL; INDUCED NAUSEA; DOUBLE-BLIND; ANTAGONIST APREPITANT; PREVENTION; CISPLATIN; PROPHYLAXIS; MULTICENTER; ONDANSETRON; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1007/s00520-018-4400-1
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PurposeRecent studies suggested that olanzapine, together with dexamethasone and serotonin-3 receptor antagonist (5HT3RA), is effective in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) following highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC). This regimen is particularly useful in Southeast Asia (SEA) countries where resources are limited. We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of incorporating olanzapine into standard antiemetic regimens for the prevention of CINV in patients receiving HEC among SEA countries.MethodsUsing a decision tree model, clinical and economic outcomes associated with olanzapine-containing regimen and standard antiemetic regimen (doublet antiemetic regimen: dexamethasone+first generation 5HT3RA) in most SEA countries except in Singapore (triplet antiemetic regimen: dexamethasone+first generation 5HT3RA + aprepitant) for CINV prevention following HEC were evaluated. This analysis was performed in Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, and Singapore, using societal perspective method with 5-day time horizon. Input parameters were derived from literature, network meta-analysis, government documents, and hospital databases. Outcomes were incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in USD/quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. A series of sensitivity analyses including probabilistic sensitivity analysis were also performed.ResultsCompared to doublet antiemetic regimen, addition of olanzapine resulted in incremental QALY of 0.0022-0.0026 with cost saving of USD 2.98, USD 27.71, and USD 52.20 in Thailand, Malaysia, and Indonesia, respectively. Compared to triplet antiemetic regimen, switching aprepitant to olanzapine yields additional 0.0005 QALY with cost saving of USD 60.91 in Singapore. The probability of being cost-effective at a cost-effectiveness threshold of 1 GDP/capita varies from 14.7 to 85.2% across countries.ConclusionThe use of olanzapine as part of standard antiemetic regimen is cost-effective for the prevention of CINV in patients receiving HEC in multiple SEA countries.
引用
收藏
页码:1109 / 1119
页数:11
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, HLTH TECHN ASS GUID
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, STAND COST LIST HLTH
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, IND FIN STAT 7 1 COM
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, CONS PRIC IND CPI
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2017, MONETARY AUTHORITY S
[6]  
Bank Indonesia, 2017, FOR EXCH REF RAT JAK
[7]  
Bank of Thailand, 2017, EC EI 027 THAIL MACR
[8]  
Bank of Thailand, 2017, FOR EXCH RAT 10 FEBR
[9]  
Basurto C, 1995, ANN ONCOL, V6, P805
[10]   Modeling Good Research Practices-Overview: A Report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-1 [J].
Caro, J. Jaime ;
Briggs, Andrew H. ;
Siebert, Uwe ;
Kuntz, Karen M. .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2012, 15 (06) :796-803