Risk Factors for Open Conversion in Minimally Invasive Cholecystectomy

被引:22
作者
Gangemi, Antonio [1 ]
Danilkowicz, Richard [1 ]
Bianco, Francesco [1 ]
Masrur, Mario [1 ]
Giulianotti, Pier Cristoforo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Div Gen Minimally Invas & Robot Surg, 840 S Wood St,Suite 435E, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
关键词
Cholecystectomy; Conversion to open surgery; Laparoscopy; Risk; Robotic surgery; LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY; SURGERY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.4293/JSLS.2017.00062
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Objectives: Open conversion (OC) occurs in 5 to 10% of laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LCs) and results in suboptimal outcomes. Herein, we report our experience with OC in cholecystectomy performed with the minimally invasive (MIS) approach. Methods: Data from 960 minimally invasive cholecystectomies performed in the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) Division of General, Minimally Invasive, and Robotic Surgery were retrospectively compiled. Patient demographics and outcomes were analyzed for the major indicators that may predispose to OC. Results: Male gender and intraoperative diagnosis of acute or gangrenous cholecystitis were identified as statistically significant individual predictors for OC. Conversion incidence was significantly lower in every paired demographic combination when compared with the laparoscopic data. Conclusions: Our retrospective study identified some specific factors associated with significantly higher risk of OC in both laparoscopic and robotic cholecystectomy. The impact of these risk factors seems to be lesser in the robotic than in the laparoscopic approach. Further investigation is necessary to validate these findings.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Predictive Factors for Conversion of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy [J].
Atmaram, D. C. ;
Lakshman, K. .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 73 (06) :423-426
[2]   LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN CHOLECYSTECTOMY - HOSPITALIZATION, SICK LEAVE, ANALGESIA AND TRAUMA RESPONSES [J].
BERGGREN, U ;
GORDH, T ;
GRAMA, D ;
HAGLUND, U ;
RASTAD, J ;
ARVIDSSON, D .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1994, 81 (09) :1362-1365
[3]   Comparison of Risk Factors for Unplanned Conversion from Laparoscopic and Robotic to Open Colorectal Surgery Using the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative (MSQC) Database [J].
Bhama, Anuradha R. ;
Wafa, Abdullah M. ;
Ferraro, Jane ;
Collins, Stacey D. ;
Mullard, Andrew J. ;
Vandewarker, James F. ;
Krapohl, Greta ;
Byrn, John C. ;
Cleary, Robert K. .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2016, 20 (06) :1223-1230
[4]   Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Coccolini, Federico ;
Catena, Fausto ;
Pisano, Michele ;
Gheza, Federico ;
Fagiuoli, Stefano ;
Di Saverio, Salomone ;
Leandro, Gioacchino ;
Montori, Giulia ;
Ceresoli, Marco ;
Corbella, Davide ;
Sartelli, Massimo ;
Sugrue, Michael ;
Ansaloni, Luca .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 18 :196-204
[5]  
Coffin SJ, 2017, SURG ENDOSC IN PRESS
[6]   Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Newer Techniques of Gallbladder Removal [J].
Comitalo, Jeffrey B. .
JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2012, 16 (03) :406-412
[7]   New minimally invasive approaches for cholecystectomy: Review of literature [J].
Gaillard, Martin ;
Tranchart, Hadrien ;
Lainas, Panagiotis ;
Dagher, Ibrahim .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2015, 7 (10) :243-248
[8]  
Gangemi A, 2017, J ROBOT SUR IN PRESS
[9]   Treatment of acute cholecystitis - A comparison of open vs laparoscopic cholecystectomy [J].
Glavic, Z ;
Begic, L ;
Simlesa, D ;
Rukavina, A .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2001, 15 (04) :398-401
[10]   Randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis [J].
Johansson, M ;
Thune, A ;
Nelvin, L ;
Stiernstam, M ;
Westman, B ;
Lundell, L .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 92 (01) :44-49