EU Climate and Energy Policy: A Hesitant Supranational Turn?

被引:43
作者
Wettestad, Jorgen [1 ]
Eikeland, Per Ove [1 ]
Nilsson, Mans [2 ]
机构
[1] Fridtjof Nansen Inst Polhogda, Oslo, Norway
[2] Stockholm Environm Inst, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
EUROPEAN INTEGRATION; GOVERNANCE; STATE; INSTITUTIONS; POWER;
D O I
10.1162/GLEP_a_00109
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This article examines the recent changes of three central EU climate and energy policies: the revised Emissions Trading Directive (ETS); the Renewables Directive (RES); and internal energy market (IEM) policy. An increasing transference of competence to EU level institutions, and hence "vertical integration," has taken place, most clearly in the case of the ETS. The main reasons for the differing increase in vertical integration are, first, that more member states were dissatisfied with the pre-existing system in the case of the ETS than in the two other cases. Second, the European Commission and Parliament were comparatively more united in pushing for changes in the case of the ETS. And, third, although RES and IEM policies were influenced by regional energy security concerns, they were less structurally linked to and influenced by the global climate regime than the ETS.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / +
页数:21
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], HDB EUROPEAN UNION P
[2]  
[Anonymous], ENERGY ENV
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, COM200087
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, **NON-TRADITIONAL**
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1997, COM97599 EUR COMM
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2006, EU ENERGY 1020, P24
[7]  
Bache Ian., 2006, POLITICS EUROPEAN UN, V2nd
[8]  
Benson D., 2010, St Antonys International Review, V5, P121
[9]  
Boerzel Tanja, 2003, ENV LEADERS LAGGARDS
[10]   Emissions trading at Kyoto:: From EU resistance to union innovation [J].
Damro, C ;
Méndez, PL .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2003, 12 (02) :71-94