Non-preferred contrast responses in the Drosophila motion pathways reveal a receptive field structure that explains a common visual illusion

被引:6
作者
Gruntman, Eyal [1 ]
Reimers, Pablo [1 ,2 ]
Romani, Sandro [1 ]
Reiser, Michael B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Howard Hughes Med Inst, Janelia Res Campus,19700 Helix Dr, Ashburn, VA 20815 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Neurobiol, Boston, MA USA
关键词
DIRECTIONAL SELECTIVITY; INSECT; INHIBITION; PERCEPTION; MECHANISMS; DETECTORS; MOVEMENT; DYNAMICS; CHANNELS; NEURONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cub.2021.09.072
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Diverse sensory systems, from audition to thermosensation, feature a separation of inputs into ON (increments) and OFF (decrements) signals. In the Drosophila visual system, separate ON and OFF pathways compute the direction of motion, yet anatomical and functional studies have identified some crosstalk between these channels. We used this well-studied circuit to ask whether the motion computation depends on ON-OFF pathway crosstalk. Using whole-cell electrophysiology, we recorded visual responses of T4 (ON) and T5 (OFF) cells, mapped their composite ON-OFF receptive fields, and found that they share a similar spatiotemporal structure. We fit a biophysical model to these receptive fields that accurately predicts directionally selective T4 and T5 responses to both ON and OFF moving stimuli. This model also provides a detailed mechanistic explanation for the directional preference inversion in response to the prominent reverse-phi illusion. Finally, we used the steering responses of tethered flying flies to validate the model's predicted effects of varying stimulus parameters on the behavioral turning inversion.
引用
收藏
页码:5286 / +
页数:21
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   Mechanism for analogous illusory motion perception in flies and humans [J].
Agrochao, Margarida ;
Tanaka, Ryosuke ;
Salazar-Gatzimas, Emilio ;
Clark, Damon A. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2020, 117 (37) :23044-23053
[2]   PHI MOVEMENT AS A SUBTRACTION PROCESS [J].
ANSTIS, SM .
VISION RESEARCH, 1970, 10 (12) :1411-&
[3]   The Temporal Tuning of the Drosophila Motion Detectors Is Determined by the Dynamics of Their Input Elements [J].
Arenz, Alexander ;
Drews, Michael S. ;
Richter, Florian G. ;
Ammer, Georg ;
Borst, Alexander .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2017, 27 (07) :929-944
[4]   Neural Mechanisms for Drosophila Contrast Vision [J].
Bahl, Armin ;
Serbe, Etienne ;
Meier, Matthias ;
Ammer, Georg ;
Borst, Alexander .
NEURON, 2015, 88 (06) :1240-1252
[5]   Object tracking in motion-blind flies [J].
Bahl, Armin ;
Ammer, Georg ;
Schilling, Tabea ;
Borst, Alexander .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 16 (06) :730-+
[6]   THE OPTIC LOBE OF DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER .2. SORTING OF RETINOTOPIC PATHWAYS IN THE MEDULLA [J].
BAUSENWEIN, B ;
DITTRICH, APM ;
FISCHBACH, KF .
CELL AND TISSUE RESEARCH, 1992, 267 (01) :17-28
[7]   Processing properties of ON and OFF pathways for Drosophila motion detection [J].
Behnia, Rudy ;
Clark, Damon A. ;
Carter, Adam G. ;
Clandinin, Thomas R. ;
Desplan, Claude .
NATURE, 2014, 512 (7515) :427-U443
[8]   A biophysical mechanism for preferred direction enhancement in fly motion vision [J].
Borst, Alexander .
PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2018, 14 (06)
[9]   Sensitivity for reverse-phi motion [J].
Bours, Roger J. E. ;
Kroes, Marijn C. W. ;
Lankheet, Martin J. .
VISION RESEARCH, 2009, 49 (01) :1-9
[10]   ELEMENTARY MOVEMENT DETECTORS IN AN INSECT VISUAL-SYSTEM [J].
BUCHNER, E .
BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS, 1976, 24 (02) :85-101