What goes around comes around: The effect of belief in karma on charitable donation behavior

被引:14
作者
Chen, Ming [1 ]
Chu, Xing-Yu [2 ]
Lin, Chien-Huang [3 ]
Yu, Shih-Heng [4 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Mkt & Logist Management, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ, Business Sch, AnZhong Bldg,16 Jinyin St, Nanjing 210093, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Natl Cent Univ, Dept Business Adm, Jhongli, Taoyuan County, Taiwan
[4] Natl United Univ, Dept Business Management, Miaoli, Taiwan
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
belief; charitable appeal; donation; guilt appeal; karma; prosocial behavior; GUILT APPEALS; MORAL IDENTITY; PRODUCT TYPE; TIME; MONEY; PERCEPTION; PROMOTION; PURSUIT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1002/mar.21642
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Karma is the notion that one's current actions will have consequences in the future. The present research links the belief in karma with a guilt appeal and examines how believing in karma influences the individuals' donation behaviors. The results of four studies demonstrate that for people who hold a strong belief in karma, guilt appeals can arouse the motivation to engage in prosocial activities to remedy past demerits. This "remedy demerits" motivation is the reason why individuals who hold a strong (vs. weak) belief in karma are more likely to donate time (rather than money) and donate money in lump sums (rather than in installments) when the charitable appeal is framed in terms of guilt. Our findings contribute to the literature on specific beliefs, individuals' prosocial behaviors, and the motivations of individuals who believe in karma as concerns their responses to charitable appeals. Charitable organizations can apply the findings by targeting their donor solicitations to individuals who believe in karma to enhance engagement in prosocial activities, and by using karma priming advertisements to induce individuals to think karmically, thus more efficiently promoting specific donation choices.
引用
收藏
页码:1065 / 1077
页数:13
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   If money does not make you happy, consider time [J].
Aaker, Jennifer L. ;
Rudd, Melanie ;
Mogilner, Cassie .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 21 (02) :126-130
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2020, The Annual Report on Philanthropyfor the Year 2019
[3]  
Atkinson W.W., 1908, Reincarnation and the Law of Karma: A Study of the Old-New World-Doctrine of Rebirth, and Spiritual Cause and Effect
[4]   Guilt and giving: A process model of empathy and efficacy [J].
Basil, Debra Z. ;
Ridgway, Nancy M. ;
Basil, Michael D. .
PSYCHOLOGY & MARKETING, 2008, 25 (01) :1-23
[5]   Guilt appeals: The mediating effect of responsibility [J].
Basil, Debra Z. ;
Ridgway, Nancy M. ;
Basil, Michael D. .
PSYCHOLOGY & MARKETING, 2006, 23 (12) :1035-1054
[6]   The potentially adaptive features of peculiar beliefs [J].
Boden, MT ;
Berenbaum, H .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2004, 37 (04) :707-719
[7]  
Bodhi B., 2005, DANA PRACTICE GIVING
[8]   EXPLANATION OF THE RELATION BETWEEN NEGATIVE MOOD AND HELPING [J].
CARLSON, M ;
MILLER, N .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1987, 102 (01) :91-108
[9]   A benefit congruency framework of sales promotion effectiveness [J].
Chandon, P ;
Wansink, B ;
Laurent, G .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2000, 64 (04) :65-81
[10]   The give and take of cause-related marketing: purchasing cause-related products licenses consumer indulgence [J].
Chang, Chun-Tuan ;
Chu, Xing-Yu .
JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF MARKETING SCIENCE, 2020, 48 (02) :203-221