Global network centrality of university rankings

被引:7
|
作者
Guo, Weisi [1 ,4 ]
Del Vecchio, Marco [2 ]
Pogrebna, Ganna [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, Sch Engn, Warwick, England
[2] Univ Warwick, Dept Stat, Warwick, England
[3] Univ Warwick, Warwick Mfg Grp, Warwick, England
[4] Alan Turing Inst, London, England
[5] Univ Birmingham, Birmingham Business Sch, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
来源
ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE | 2017年 / 4卷 / 10期
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
university performance; complex network; transport network; TRANSPORTATION NETWORK;
D O I
10.1098/rsos.171172
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Universities and higher education institutions form an integral part of the national infrastructure and prestige. As academic research benefits increasingly from international exchange and cooperation, many universities have increased investment in improving and enabling their global connectivity. Yet, the relationship of university performance and its global physical connectedness has not been explored in detail. We conduct, to our knowledge, the first large-scale data-driven analysis into whether there is a correlation between university relative ranking performance and its global connectivity via the air transport network. The results show that local access to global hubs (as measured by air transport network betweenness) strongly and positively correlates with the ranking growth (statistical significance in different models ranges between 5% and 1% level). We also found that the local airport's aggregate flight paths (degree) and capacity (weighted degree) has no effect on university ranking, further showing that global connectivity distance is more important than the capacity of flight connections. We also examined the effect of local city economic development as a confounding variable and no effect was observed suggesting that access to global transportation hubs outweighs economic performance as a determinant of university ranking. The impact of this research is that we have determined the importance of the centrality of global connectivity and, hence, established initial evidence for further exploring potential connections between university ranking and regional investment policies on improving global connectivity.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Statement on Global University Rankings
    Barsky, Osvaldo
    DEBATE UNIVERSITARIO, 2024, 14 (23)
  • [2] Rankings and their limits: the role of global university rankings in university mergers in Finland
    Kohvakka, Mikko
    Nevala, Arto
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2024, 68 (01) : 22 - 35
  • [3] Global University Rankings and Their Impact
    Akkin, Salih Murat
    Ay, Canan
    YUKSEKOGRETIM DERGISI, 2011, 1 (02): : 113 - 115
  • [4] How Rankings Produce Competition: The Case of Global University Rankings
    Brankovic, Jelena
    Ringel, Leopold
    Werron, Tobias
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SOZIOLOGIE, 2018, 47 (04): : 270 - 287
  • [5] Global Rankings as a Marker of Revaluing the University
    Mittelman, James H.
    GLOBAL UNIVERSITY RANKINGS: CHALLENGES FOR EUROPEAN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2013, : 223 - 235
  • [6] Global university rankings and the metrics maze
    Carnegie, Garry D. D.
    ACCOUNTING AUDITING & ACCOUNTABILITY JOURNAL, 2023, 36 (01): : 430 - 433
  • [7] Global university rankings - a comparative analysis
    Pavel, Adina-Petruta
    4TH WORLD CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS, ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT (WCBEM-2015), 2015, 26 : 54 - 63
  • [8] GLOBAL UNIVERSITY RANKINGS AND THE POLITICS OF KNOWLEDGE
    Pillainayagam, Jenna
    Kermani, Karin
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF HIGHER EDUCATION, 2023, 52 (03): : 113 - 114
  • [9] The Comparative Reliability of the Global University Rankings
    Balatsky, E. V.
    Ekimova, N. A.
    ZHURNAL NOVAYA EKONOMICHESKAYA ASSOTSIATSIYA-JOURNAL OF THE NEW ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, 2011, (11): : 127 - 140
  • [10] The Global University Rankings: the Problem of Manipulation
    Balatsky, E. V.
    Ekimova, N. A.
    ZHURNAL NOVAYA EKONOMICHESKAYA ASSOTSIATSIYA-JOURNAL OF THE NEW ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, 2012, (01): : 126 - 146