Bird-window collisions: Mitigation efficacy and risk factors across two years

被引:7
作者
Brown, Barbara B. [1 ]
Santos, Sabrina [2 ]
Ocampo-Penuela, Natalia [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Family & Consumer Studies Dept, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[2] Univ Utah, Environm & Sustainabil Studies, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[3] Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Environm Studies, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA
来源
PEERJ | 2021年 / 9卷
关键词
Bird; Window collision/strike; Prevention; Reflective windows; Bird-friendly window; Collision deterrent film; Fritted window; UV patterned window; Cedar Waxwing; Season; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.7717/peerj.11867
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background. Research on bird-window collision mitigation is needed to prevent up to a billion bird fatalities yearly in the U.S. At the University of Utah campus (Salt Lake City, Utah, USA), past research documented collisions, especially for Cedar Waxwings (Bombycilla cedrorum) drawn to fruiting ornamental pears in winter. Mirrored windows, which have a metallic coating that turns window exteriors into mirrors, had frequent collisions, which were mitigated when Feather Friendly (R) bird deterrent markers were applied. Bird-friendly windows-ORNILUX (R) ultraviolet (UV) and fitted windows-also reduced collisions when data were collected across fall and winter. Extending this prior research, we evaluated additional mitigation and tested the replicability of effects for pear trees, mirrored windows, and bird-friendly windows across two years. Methods. Using published data from eight buildings monitored for collisions in year 1 (Fall and Winter, 2019-2020), we added another year of monitoring, Fall and Winter, 2020-2021. Between years, Feather Friendly (R) mitigation markers were added to collision-prone areas of two buildings, including both mirrored and transparent windows. Results. The two buildings that received new Feather Friendly (R) mitigation had significantly fewer collisions post-mitigation. Control areas also had nonsignificant decline in collisions. The interaction of area (mitigation vs. control) by time (year 1 vs. 2) was significant, based on generalized estimating equations (GEE). The total yearly collisions across all eight buildings declined from 39 to 23. A second GEE analysis of all 8 buildings showed that mirrored windows, pear trees, and bird-friendly windows were each significant when analyzed separately. The best-fit model showed more collisions for mirrored windows and fewer collisions for bird-friendly windows. We found pear tree proximity to be related to more collisions in winter than fall. In addition, pear trees showed reduced collisions from year 1 to 2, consistent with new mitigation for two of three buildings near pear trees. Discussion. Feather Friendly (R) markers can mitigate collisions with transparent windows, not only mirrored windows, compared to unmitigated areas over 2 years. Results also underscore the dangers of pear tree proximity and mirrored windows and the efficacy of bird-friendly windows. Thus, bird collisions can be prevented by window mitigation, permanent bird-friendly windows, and landscape designs that avoid creating ecological traps.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [21] Glass pane markings to prevent bird-window collisions: less can be more
    Roessler, Martin
    Nemeth, Erwin
    Bruckner, Alexander
    BIOLOGIA, 2015, 70 (04) : 535 - 541
  • [22] Building facade-level correlates of bird-window collisions in a small urban area
    Riding, Corey S.
    O'Connell, Timothy J.
    Loss, Scott R.
    CONDOR, 2020, 122 (01):
  • [23] Comparing the results of recall surveys and standardized searches in understanding bird-window collisions at houses
    Kummer, Justine A.
    Bayne, Erin M.
    Machtans, Craig S.
    AVIAN CONSERVATION AND ECOLOGY, 2016, 11 (01)
  • [24] Drivers of bird-window collisions in southern South America: a two- scale assessment applying citizen science
    Rebolo-Ifran, Natalia
    di Virgilio, Agustina
    Lambertucci, Sergio A.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [25] Seasonal variation in drivers of bird-window collisions on the west coast of British Columbia, Canada
    Zulian, Viviane
    Norris, Andrea R.
    Cockle, Kristina L.
    Porter, Alison N.
    Do, Lauryn G.
    De Groot, Krista L.
    AVIAN CONSERVATION AND ECOLOGY, 2023, 18 (02)
  • [26] Cat and dog predation on birds: The importance of indirect predation after bird-window collisions
    Rebolo-Ifran, Natalia
    Zamora-Nasca, Lucia
    Lambertucci, Sergio A.
    PERSPECTIVES IN ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2021, 19 (03) : 293 - 299
  • [27] Opening the black box of bird-window collisions: passive video recordings in a residential backyard
    Samuels, Brendon
    Fenton, Brock
    Fernandez-Juricic, Esteban
    MacDougall-Shackleton, Scott A.
    PEERJ, 2022, 10
  • [28] Factors influencing experimental estimation of scavenger removal and observer detection in bird-window collision surveys
    Riding, Corey S.
    Loss, Scott R.
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2018, 28 (08) : 2119 - 2129
  • [29] Year-round monitoring reveals prevalence of fatal bird-window collisions at the Virginia Tech Corporate Research Center
    Schneider, Rebecca M.
    Barton, Christine M.
    Zirkle, Keith W.
    Greene, Caitlin F.
    Newman, Kara B.
    PEERJ, 2018, 6
  • [30] Bird protection treatments reduce bird-window collision risk at low-rise buildings within a Pacific coastal protected area
    De Groot, Krista L.
    Wilson, Amy G.
    McKibbin, Rene
    Hudson, Sarah A.
    Dohms, Kimberly M.
    Norris, Andrea R.
    Huang, Andrew C.
    Whitehorne, Ivy B. J.
    Fort, Kevin T.
    Roy, Christian
    Bourque, Julie
    Wilson, Scott
    PEERJ, 2022, 10