Bird-window collisions: Mitigation efficacy and risk factors across two years

被引:7
|
作者
Brown, Barbara B. [1 ]
Santos, Sabrina [2 ]
Ocampo-Penuela, Natalia [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Family & Consumer Studies Dept, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[2] Univ Utah, Environm & Sustainabil Studies, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[3] Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Environm Studies, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA
来源
PEERJ | 2021年 / 9卷
关键词
Bird; Window collision/strike; Prevention; Reflective windows; Bird-friendly window; Collision deterrent film; Fritted window; UV patterned window; Cedar Waxwing; Season; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.7717/peerj.11867
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background. Research on bird-window collision mitigation is needed to prevent up to a billion bird fatalities yearly in the U.S. At the University of Utah campus (Salt Lake City, Utah, USA), past research documented collisions, especially for Cedar Waxwings (Bombycilla cedrorum) drawn to fruiting ornamental pears in winter. Mirrored windows, which have a metallic coating that turns window exteriors into mirrors, had frequent collisions, which were mitigated when Feather Friendly (R) bird deterrent markers were applied. Bird-friendly windows-ORNILUX (R) ultraviolet (UV) and fitted windows-also reduced collisions when data were collected across fall and winter. Extending this prior research, we evaluated additional mitigation and tested the replicability of effects for pear trees, mirrored windows, and bird-friendly windows across two years. Methods. Using published data from eight buildings monitored for collisions in year 1 (Fall and Winter, 2019-2020), we added another year of monitoring, Fall and Winter, 2020-2021. Between years, Feather Friendly (R) mitigation markers were added to collision-prone areas of two buildings, including both mirrored and transparent windows. Results. The two buildings that received new Feather Friendly (R) mitigation had significantly fewer collisions post-mitigation. Control areas also had nonsignificant decline in collisions. The interaction of area (mitigation vs. control) by time (year 1 vs. 2) was significant, based on generalized estimating equations (GEE). The total yearly collisions across all eight buildings declined from 39 to 23. A second GEE analysis of all 8 buildings showed that mirrored windows, pear trees, and bird-friendly windows were each significant when analyzed separately. The best-fit model showed more collisions for mirrored windows and fewer collisions for bird-friendly windows. We found pear tree proximity to be related to more collisions in winter than fall. In addition, pear trees showed reduced collisions from year 1 to 2, consistent with new mitigation for two of three buildings near pear trees. Discussion. Feather Friendly (R) markers can mitigate collisions with transparent windows, not only mirrored windows, compared to unmitigated areas over 2 years. Results also underscore the dangers of pear tree proximity and mirrored windows and the efficacy of bird-friendly windows. Thus, bird collisions can be prevented by window mitigation, permanent bird-friendly windows, and landscape designs that avoid creating ecological traps.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Winter bird-window collisions: mitigation success, risk factors, and implementation challenges
    Brown, Barbara B.
    Kusakabe, Erika
    Antonopoulos, Angelo
    Siddoway, Sarah
    Thompson, Lisa
    PEERJ, 2019, 7
  • [2] Bird-window collisions: different fall and winter risk and protective factors
    Brown, Barbara B.
    Hunter, Lia
    Santos, Sabrina
    PEERJ, 2020, 8
  • [3] Patterns of bird-window collisions inform mitigation on a university campus
    Ocampo-Penuela, Natalia
    Winton, R. Scott
    Wu, Charlene J.
    Zambello, Erika
    Wittig, Thomas W.
    Cagle, Nicolette L.
    PEERJ, 2016, 4
  • [4] PREVENTING BIRD-WINDOW COLLISIONS
    Klem, Daniel, Jr.
    WILSON JOURNAL OF ORNITHOLOGY, 2009, 121 (02) : 314 - 321
  • [5] Geo-referencing bird-window collisions for targeted mitigation
    Winton, R. Scott
    Ocampo-Penuela, Natalia
    Cagle, Nicolette
    PEERJ, 2018, 6
  • [6] Stakeholder perceptions of bird-window collisions
    Riggs, Georgia J.
    Joshi, Omkar
    Loss, Scott R.
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (02):
  • [7] Factors influencing the annual risk of bird-window collisions at residential structures in Alberta, Canada
    Bayne, Erin M.
    Scobie, Corey A.
    Rawson-Clark, Michael
    WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2012, 39 (07) : 583 - 592
  • [8] Bird-window collisions in the summer breeding season
    Hager, Stephen B.
    Craig, Matthew E.
    PEERJ, 2014, 2
  • [9] Predicting bird-window collisions with weather radar
    Elmore, Jared A.
    Riding, Corey S.
    Horton, Kyle G.
    O'Connell, Timothy J.
    Farnsworth, Andrew
    Loss, Scott R.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2021, 58 (08) : 1593 - 1601
  • [10] Main causes of bird-window collisions: a review
    Basilio, Lay G.
    Moreno, Daniele J.
    Piratelli, Augusto J.
    ANAIS DA ACADEMIA BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIAS, 2020, 92 (01):