Can species distribution modelling provide estimates of population densities? A case study with jaguars in the Neotropics

被引:113
作者
Torres, Natalia M. [1 ,2 ]
De Marco Junior, Paulo [3 ]
Santos, Thiago [2 ]
Silveira, Leandro [1 ]
de Almeida Jacomo, Anah T. [1 ]
Diniz-Filho, Jose A. F. [3 ]
机构
[1] Jaguar Conservat Fund, BR-75830000 Mineiros, Go, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Goias, Grad Program Ecol & Evolut, ICB, BR-74001970 Goiania, Go, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Goias, Dept Biol Geral, ICB, BR-74001970 Goiania, Go, Brazil
关键词
Jaguar; population density estimates; quantile regression; species distribution modelling; suitability; QUANTILE REGRESSION; PANTHERA-ONCA; ABUNDANCE; CONSERVATION; PREDICTION; AREAS; ACCURACY; GARP; PROBABILITY; ECOLOGY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1472-4642.2012.00892.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Aim To test the prediction that environmental suitability derived from species distribution modelling (SDM) could be a surrogate for jaguar local population density estimates. Location Americas. Methods We used 1409 occurrence records of jaguars to model the distribution of the species using 11 SDM methods. We tested whether models suitability is linearly correlated with jaguar population densities estimated from 37 different locations. We evaluated whether the relationship between density and suitability forms a constraint envelope, in which higher densities are found mainly in regions with high suitability, whereas low densities can occur in regions with variable suitability. We tested this using heteroscedasticity test and quantile regressions. Results A positive linear relationship between suitability and jaguar density was found only for four methods [bioclimatic envelope (BIOCLIM), genetic algorithm for rule set production (GARP), maximum entropy (Maxent) and generalized boosting models (GBM)], but with weak explanatory power. BIOCLIM showed the strongest relationship. Variance of suitability for lower densities values was larger than for higher values for many of the SDM models used, but the quantile regression was significantly positive only for BIOCLIM and random forests (RF). RF and GBM provided the most accurate models when measured with the standard SDM evaluation metrics, but possess poor relationship with local density estimates. Main conclusions Results indicate that the relationship between density and suitability could be better described as a triangular constraint envelope than by a straight positive relationship, and some of the SDM methods tested here were able to discriminate regions with high or low local population densities. Low jaguar densities can occur in areas with low or high suitability, whereas high values are restricted to areas where the suitability is greater. In high suitability areas but with low jaguar density estimates, we discuss how extrinsic factors driving abundance could act at local scales and then prevent higher densities that would be expected by the favourable regional environmental conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:615 / 627
页数:13
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]   Favourability functions versus probability of presence: advantages and misuses [J].
Albert, Cecile H. ;
Thuiller, Wilfried .
ECOGRAPHY, 2008, 31 (04) :417-422
[2]   Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS) [J].
Allouche, Omri ;
Tsoar, Asaf ;
Kadmon, Ronen .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2006, 43 (06) :1223-1232
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Macroecology
[4]  
Araujo M. B., 2007, NATURE, V427, P145
[5]   Species distribution models and ecological theory: A critical assessment and some possible new approaches [J].
Austin, Mike .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2007, 200 (1-2) :1-19
[6]   Predicting plant species distribution across an alpine rangeland in northern Spain. A comparison of probabilistic methods [J].
Bedia, J. ;
Busque, J. ;
Gutierrez, J. M. .
APPLIED VEGETATION SCIENCE, 2011, 14 (03) :415-432
[7]   SmcHD1, containing a structural-maintenance-of-chromosomes hinge domain, has a critical role in X inactivation [J].
Blewitt, Marnie E. ;
Gendrel, Anne-Valerie ;
Pang, Zhenyi ;
Sparrow, Duncan B. ;
Whitelaw, Nadia ;
Craig, Jeffrey M. ;
Apedaile, Anwyn ;
Hilton, Douglas J. ;
Dunwoodie, Sally L. ;
Brockdorff, Neil ;
Kay, Graham F. ;
Whitelaw, Emma .
NATURE GENETICS, 2008, 40 (05) :663-669
[8]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[9]   The geographic range: Size, shape, boundaries, and internal structure [J].
Brown, JH ;
Stevens, GC ;
Kaufman, DM .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 1996, 27 :597-623
[10]   ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ABUNDANCE AND DISTRIBUTION OF SPECIES [J].
BROWN, JH .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1984, 124 (02) :255-279