Pretreatment with thiopental for prevention of pain associated with propofol injection

被引:59
作者
Agarwal, A
Ansari, MF
Gupta, D
Pandey, R
Raza, M
Singh, PK
Shiopriye
Dhiraj, S
Singh, U
机构
[1] Sanjay Gandhi Postgrad Inst Med Sci, Dept Anesthesia, Lucknow 226014, Uttar Pradesh, India
[2] Sanjay Gandhi Postgrad Inst Med Sci, Dept Biostat, Lucknow 226014, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
D O I
10.1213/01.ANE.0000103266.73568.18
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Propofol causes pain on IV injection in 28%-90% of patients. A number of techniques have been tried to minimize propofol-induced pain, with variable results. We compared the efficacy of pretreatment with thiopental 0.25 mg/kg and 0.5 mg/kg and lidocaine 40 mg after venous occlusion for prevention of propofol-induced pain. One-hundred-twenty-four adult patients, ASA physical status I-II, undergoing elective surgery were randomly assigned into 4 groups of 31 each. Group I received normal saline, group II received lidocaine 2% (40 mg), and groups III and IV received thiopental 0.25 mg/kg and 0.5 mg/kg, respectively. All pretreatment drugs were made in 2 mL and were accompanied by manual venous occlusion for 1 min. Propofol was administered after release of venous occlusion. Pain was assessed with a four-point scale: 0 = no pain, 1 = mild pain, 2 = moderate pain, and 3 = severe pain at the time of propofol injection. Twenty-four patients (77%) complained of pain in the group pretreated with normal saline as compared with 12 (39%),10 (32%), and 1 (3%) in the groups pretreated with lidocaine 40 mg, thiopental 0.25 mg/kg, and thiopental 0.5 mg/kg, respectively (P < 0.05). Thiopental 0.5 mg/kg was the most effective treatment. We therefore suggest routine pretreatment with thiopental 0.5 mg/kg along with venous occlusion for 1 min for prevention of pain associated with propofol injection.
引用
收藏
页码:683 / 686
页数:4
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
AANKERMOLLER D, 1991, BRIT J ANAESTH, V66, P185
[2]   Ondansetron pretreatment to alleviate pain on propofol injection: A randomized, controlled, double blinded study [J].
Ambesh, SP ;
Dubey, PK ;
Sinha, PK .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1999, 89 (01) :197-199
[3]  
Asik I, 2003, EUR J ANAESTH, V20, P487
[4]   CONTRIBUTION OF CENTRAL NEUROPLASTICITY TO PATHOLOGICAL PAIN - REVIEW OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL-EVIDENCE [J].
CODERRE, TJ ;
KATZ, J ;
VACCARINO, AL ;
MELZACK, R .
PAIN, 1993, 52 (03) :259-285
[5]   THIOPENTONE PRETREATMENT FOR PROPOFOL INJECTION PAIN IN AMBULATORY PATIENTS [J].
HAUGEN, RD ;
VAGHADIA, H ;
WATERS, T ;
MERRICK, PM .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1995, 42 (12) :1108-1112
[6]  
HILLIER SC, 1996, CLIN ANESTH, P1159
[7]   LIDOCAINE FOR THE PREVENTION OF PAIN DUE TO INJECTION OF PROPOFOL [J].
KING, SY ;
DAVIS, FM ;
WELLS, JE ;
MURCHISON, DJ ;
PRYOR, PJ .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1992, 74 (02) :246-249
[8]   PAIN ON INJECTION OF PROPOFOL - EFFECTS OF CONCENTRATION AND DILUENT [J].
KLEMENT, W ;
ARNDT, JO .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1991, 67 (03) :281-284
[9]  
LEE TW, 1994, ANAESTHESIA, V49, P817
[10]  
LOMAX D, 1994, ANAESTH INTENS CARE, V22, P500