Comparison of an individual congener standard and a technical mixture for the quantification of toxaphene in environmental matrices by HRGC/ECNI-HRMS

被引:27
作者
Braekevelt, E [1 ]
Tomy, GT [1 ]
Stern, GA [1 ]
机构
[1] Fisheries & Oceans Canada, Inst Freshwater, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N6, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1021/es0018567
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Both a technical standard and a recently commercially available standard containing 25 congeners were-used to quantify toxaphene in a variety of environmental matrices, using high-resolution gas chromatography/electron capture negative ion high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRGC/ECNI-HRMS). The purpose was to examine, the differences between the two standards and to assess how well the congener standard describes the total toxaphene profile. At a resolving power of similar to 11 000 no interferences from other organochlorines were observed. Biotic matrices were enriched in octa- and nonachlorobornanes relative to the technical mixture, whereas abiotic matrices were enriched in hexa- and heptachlorobornanes. The hexa- and heptachlorobornanes were generally overestimated by the weighted response of the technical mixture, whereas the nonachlorobornanes were consistently underestimated. The extent to which the technical mixture over- or underestimates total toxaphene concentrations depends on the distribution of congeners among homologue groups and the abundance of particular congeners. The current 25-congener mixture described only similar to 35-75% of the total toxaphene response: more congeners are needed to adequately describe some matrices. Correction factors were developed that will allow laboratories to report reliable concentrations of individual congeners in samples that were quantified using the technical mixture, but they should be applied with caution, as they may be highly instrument dependent.
引用
收藏
页码:3513 / 3518
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Optimized pressure-pulse splitless injection and electron-capture, negative ionization detection for the congener specific determination of compounds of technical toxaphene [J].
Bartha, R ;
Vetter, W ;
Luckas, B .
FRESENIUS JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1997, 358 (7-8) :812-817
[2]  
BIDLEMAN TF, 1989, ARCTIC, V42, P307
[3]   Octanol/water partition coefficients of toxaphene congeners determined by the "slow-stirring" method [J].
Fisk, AT ;
Rosenberg, B ;
Cymbalisty, CD ;
Stern, GA ;
Muir, DCG .
CHEMOSPHERE, 1999, 39 (14) :2549-2562
[4]   THE QUANTIFICATION OF TOXAPHENE IN ENVIRONMENTAL-SAMPLES [J].
FOWLER, B ;
HOOVER, D ;
HAMILTON, MC .
CHEMOSPHERE, 1993, 27 (10) :1891-1905
[5]   The determination of toxaphene in environmental samples by negative ion electron capture high resolution mass spectrometry [J].
Fowler, B .
CHEMOSPHERE, 2000, 41 (04) :487-492
[6]   Automated toxaphene quantitation by GC/MS [J].
Glassmeyer, ST ;
Shanks, KE ;
Hites, RA .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1999, 71 (07) :1448-1453
[7]  
GRUSSENDORF OW, 1970, J ASSOC OFF ANA CHEM, V53, P1048
[8]   Historical input and degradation of toxaphene in Lake Ontario sediment [J].
Howdeshell, MJ ;
Hites, RA .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1996, 30 (01) :220-224
[9]   FTIR spectroscopic characterization of chlorinated camphenes and bornenes in technical toxaphene [J].
Kimmel, L ;
Coelhan, M ;
Leupold, G ;
Vetter, W ;
Parlar, H .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 34 (14) :3041-3045
[10]   HRGC-ECD and HRGC-ECNI-SIM-HRMS quantification of toxaphene residues by six environmentally relevant chlorobornanes as standard [J].
Kimmel, L ;
Angerhofer, D ;
Gill, U ;
Coelhan, M ;
Parlar, H .
CHEMOSPHERE, 1998, 37 (03) :549-558