Invited review: Maximizing value and minimizing waste in clinical trial research in dairy cattle: Selecting interventions and outcomes to build an evidence base

Clinical trials are a valuable study design for evalu-ating interventions when it is ethical and feasible for investigators to randomly allocate study animals to intervention groups. Researchers may choose to evalu-ate the comparative efficacy of intervention groups for their effect on outcomes that are relevant to the specific objectives of their trial. However, the results across multiple trials on the same intervention and with the same outcome should be considered when making decisions on whether to use an intervention, because the results of a single trial are subject to sampling error and do not reflect all biological variability. The objective of this review was to provide an overview of important concepts when selecting intervention groups and outcomes within a randomized controlled trial, and when building a body of evidence for intervention efficacy across multiple trials. Empirical evidence is presented to highlight that integrating and interpreting the efficacy of an intervention across trials is hindered by a lack of replication of interventions across trials. Inconsistency in the outcomes and their measurement among trials also limits the ability to build a body of evidence for the efficacy of interventions. The devel-opment of core outcome sets for specific topic areas in dairy science, updated as necessary, may improve consistency across trials and aid in the development of a body of evidence for evidence-based decision-making.